Literature DB >> 21527788

Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke.

Eric Zarahn1, Leeor Alon, Sophia L Ryan, Ronald M Lazar, Magnus-Sebastian Vry, Cornelius Weiller, Randolph S Marshall, John W Krakauer.   

Abstract

There is substantial interpatient variation in recovery from upper limb impairment after stroke in patients with severe initial impairment. Defining recovery as a change in the upper limb Fugl-Meyer score (ΔFM), we predicted ΔFM with its conditional expectation (i.e., posterior mean) given upper limb Fugl-Meyer initial impairment (FM(ii)) and a putative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recovery measure. Patients with first time, ischemic stroke were imaged at 2.5 ± 2.2 days poststroke with 1.5-T fMRI during a hand closure task alternating with rest (fundamental frequency = 0.025 Hz, scan duration = 172 s). Confirming a previous finding, we observed that the prediction of ΔFM by FM(ii) alone is good in patients with nonsevere initial hemiparesis but is not good in patients with severe initial hemiparesis (96% and 16% of the total sum of squares of ΔFM explained, respectively). In patients with severe initial hemiparesis, prediction of ΔFM by the combination of FM(ii) and the putative fMRI recovery measure nonsignificantly increased predictive explanation from 16% to 47% of the total sum of squares of ΔFM explained. The implications of this preliminary negative result are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527788      PMCID: PMC3209795          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  55 in total

1.  Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm.

Authors:  C Calautti; F Leroy; J Y Guincestre; J C Baron
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Analysis of recovery processes after stroke by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hank T Hendricks; Jaco W Pasman; Johannes L Merx; Jacques van Limbeek; Machiel J Zwarts
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn Kollen; Jos Twisk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Updates on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in physical and rehabilitation medicine.

Authors:  Julie A Williams; Marta Imamura; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment.

Authors:  Annette A van Kuijk; Jaco W Pasman; Henk T Hendricks; Machiel J Zwarts; Alexander C H Geurts
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  J H Van der Lee; V De Groot; H Beckerman; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Motor outcome according to diffusion tensor tractography findings in the early stage of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Cho; Seong Ho Kim; Byung Yun Choi; Soo Ho Cho; Jae Hoon Kang; Chu-Hee Lee; Woo Mok Byun; Sung Ho Jang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment.

Authors:  C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology.

Authors:  Orlando B C Swayne; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward; Richard J Greenwood
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  45 in total

1.  Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.

Authors:  Robert W Regenhardt; Hajime Takase; Eng H Lo; David J Lin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Age is negatively associated with upper limb recovery after conventional but not robotic rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesca Cecchi; Marco Germanotta; Claudio Macchi; Angelo Montesano; Silvia Galeri; Manuela Diverio; Catiuscia Falsini; Monica Martini; Rita Mosca; Emanuele Langone; Dionysia Papadopoulou; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Optimizing functional outcome endpoints for stroke recovery studies.

Authors:  Mustafa Balkaya; Sunghee Cho
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Merav R Senesh; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Lukas J Volz; Delia-Lisa Feis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Comparing prognostic strength of acute corticospinal tract injury measured by a new diffusion tensor imaging based template approach versus common approaches.

Authors:  Kelsi K Hirai; Benjamin N Groisser; William A Copen; Aneesh B Singhal; Judith D Schaechter
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  The epigenetics of stroke recovery and rehabilitation: from polycomb to histone deacetylases.

Authors:  Jessica Elder; Mar Cortes; Avrielle Rykman; Justin Hill; Saravanan Karuppagounder; Dylan Edwards; Rajiv R Ratan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.620

8.  Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes.

Authors:  Wuwei Feng; Jasmine Wang; Pratik Y Chhatbar; Christopher Doughty; Douglas Landsittel; Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas; Steven A Kautz; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 9.  Translational Hurdles in Stroke Recovery Studies.

Authors:  Jukka Jolkkonen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.829

10.  Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Joost van Kordelaar; Erwin E H van Wegen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.