Literature DB >> 24092615

The epigenetics of stroke recovery and rehabilitation: from polycomb to histone deacetylases.

Jessica Elder1, Mar Cortes, Avrielle Rykman, Justin Hill, Saravanan Karuppagounder, Dylan Edwards, Rajiv R Ratan.   

Abstract

Classical de-afferentation studies, as well as experience-dependent visual plasticity paradigms, have confirmed that both the developing and adult nervous system are capable of unexpected levels of plasticity. This capacity is underscored by the significant spontaneous recovery that can occur in patients with mild-to-moderate impairment following stroke. An evolving model is that an interaction of biological and environmental factors during all epochs post-stroke influences the extent and quality of this plasticity. Here, we discuss data that have implicated specific epigenetic proteins as integrators of environmental influences in 3 aspects of stroke recovery: spontaneous impairment reduction in humans; peri-infarct rewiring in animals as a paradigm for developing therapeutically-driven impairment reduction beyond natural spontaneous recovery; and, finally, classical hippocampal learning and memory paradigms that are theoretically important in skill acquisition for both impairment reduction and compensatory strategies in the rehabilitation setting. Our discussion focuses primarily on B lymphoma Mo-MLV1 insertion region proteins of the polycomb repressive complex, alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked chromatin remodeling factors, and the best known and most dynamic gene repressors, histone deacetylases. We will highlight exciting current data associated with these proteins and provide promising speculation about how they can be manipulated by drugs, biologics, or noninvasive stimulation for stroke recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24092615      PMCID: PMC3805866          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-013-0224-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   7.620


  63 in total

1.  Strategies in motor stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Agnes Floel; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Neuroimmune regulation of homeostatic synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Horia Pribiag; David Stellwagen
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.

Authors:  Timothy H Murphy; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  A critical threshold of rehabilitation involving brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for poststroke recovery.

Authors:  Crystal L MacLellan; Michael B Keough; Shirley Granter-Button; Garry A Chernenko; Stephanie Butt; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Repetitive hypoxia extends endogenous neurovascular protection for stroke.

Authors:  Ann M Stowe; Tamer Altay; Angela B Freie; Jeffrey M Gidday
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Michelle L Byrnes; Sarah A Archer; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity.

Authors:  Ronald M Lazar; Brandon Minzer; Daniel Antoniello; Joanne R Festa; John W Krakauer; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  The chromatin remodeller ATRX: a repeat offender in human disease.

Authors:  David Clynes; Douglas R Higgs; Richard J Gibbons
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 13.807

10.  HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Ji-Song Guan; Stephen J Haggarty; Emanuela Giacometti; Jan-Hermen Dannenberg; Nadine Joseph; Jun Gao; Thomas J F Nieland; Ying Zhou; Xinyu Wang; Ralph Mazitschek; James E Bradner; Ronald A DePinho; Rudolf Jaenisch; Li-Huei Tsai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Looking above but not beyond the genome for therapeutics in neurology and psychiatry: epigenetic proteins and RNAs find a new focus.

Authors:  Manuela Basso; Sama Sleiman; Rajiv R Ratan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Epigenetic mechanisms of neuroplasticity and the implications for stroke recovery.

Authors:  Ryan J Felling; Hongjun Song
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 3.  Epigenetic changes following traumatic brain injury and their implications for outcome, recovery and therapy.

Authors:  Victor S Wong; Brett Langley
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Plasticity of Sensorimotor Networks: Multiple Overlapping Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Sook-Lei Liew; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 5.  Brain Functional Reserve in the Context of Neuroplasticity after Stroke.

Authors:  Jan Dąbrowski; Anna Czajka; Justyna Zielińska-Turek; Janusz Jaroszyński; Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk; Aneta Mela; Łukasz A Poniatowski; Bartłomiej Drop; Małgorzata Dorobek; Maria Barcikowska-Kotowicz; Andrzej Ziemba
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The Dynamic Partnership of Polycomb and Trithorax in Brain Development and Diseases.

Authors:  Janise N Kuehner; Bing Yao
Journal:  Epigenomes       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 7.  Epigenetic Regulation of Oxidative Stress in Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Haiping Zhao; Ziping Han; Xunming Ji; Yumin Luo
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 6.745

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.