Literature DB >> 16931787

Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke.

Gert Kwakkel1, Boudewijn Kollen, Jos Twisk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Longitudinal conducted studies show that neurologic and functional recovery show faster recovery in the first weeks poststroke. The aim of the present study was to study the effects of progress of time on observed improvements in motor strength, synergisms, and activities during the first 16 weeks poststroke.
METHODS: Based on data from a previous study, 101 patients with first-ever ischemic middle cerebral artery strokes were prospectively investigated during the first 16 weeks after stroke. Progress of time was categorized into 8 biweekly time intervals and was used as the independent covariate in a first-order longitudinal regression model. The biweekly time change (progress of time) was related to improvement in upper and lower limb motor recovery assessed with Fugl-Meyer score and Motricity Index, reduction in visuospatial inattention based on the letter cancellation task, and improvement in walking ability, dexterity, and activities of daily living measured with the Functional Ambulation Categories, Action Research Arm test, and Barthel Index.
RESULTS: Time explained a significant change of 8.4 (42%) measurement units on the Barthel Index for the first 10 weeks poststroke, 1.1 (22%) measurement units on Functional Ambulation Categories, and 19% on the Action Research Arm test for the first 6 and 8 weeks poststroke. Approximately 25% (for Fugl-Meyer-arm) to 26% (for Motricity Index-arm) of the significant change in measurements units was explained by time alone for the upper limb compared with 33% for Fugl-Meyer-leg and 39% for Motricity Index-leg of the lower limb. Time accounted for a reduction of 16% in the letter cancellation task. Observed associations did not change after controlling for covariates such as age, gender, hemisphere of stroke, type of stroke, or intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Progress of time is an independent covariate that reflects spontaneous recovery of body functions and activities explaining &16% to 42% of the observed improvements in the first 6 to 10 weeks after stroke onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931787     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  101 in total

1.  Damage control in the nervous system: rehabilitation in a plastic environment.

Authors:  James W Fawcett; Armin Curt
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Assessing and restoring cognitive functions early after stroke.

Authors:  Chiara Zucchella; Annarita Capone; Valentina Codella; Carmine Vecchione; Giovanni Buccino; Giorgio Sandrini; Francesco Pierelli; Michelangelo Bartolo
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

3.  Comparison of measurement properties of three shortened versions of the balance evaluation system test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke.

Authors:  Thitimard Winairuk; Marco Y C Pang; Vitoon Saengsirisuwan; Fay B Horak; Rumpa Boonsinsukh
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 4.  [Evidence-based rehabilitation of mobility after stroke].

Authors:  C Dohle; R Tholen; H Wittenberg; J Quintern; S Saal; K M Stephan
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Corticospinal Tract Injury Estimated From Acute Stroke Imaging Predicts Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  David J Lin; Alison M Cloutier; Kimberly S Erler; Jessica M Cassidy; Samuel B Snider; Jessica Ranford; Kristin Parlman; Fabio Giatsidis; James F Burke; Lee H Schwamm; Seth P Finklestein; Leigh R Hochberg; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn J Kollen; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Virtual Reality for Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Post-Stroke: The Promise and Current State of the Field.

Authors:  Gerard G Fluet; Judith E Deutsch
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2013-03

9.  Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design.

Authors:  A Lex E Q van Delden; C Lieke E Peper; Jaap Harlaar; Andreas Daffertshofer; Nienke I Zijp; Kirsten Nienhuys; Peter Koppe; Gert Kwakkel; Peter J Beek
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.