Literature DB >> 21525378

From body form to biological motion: the apparent velocity of human movement biases subjective time.

Guido Orgs1, Sven Bestmann, Friederike Schuur, Patrick Haggard.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated time perception during apparent biological motion. Pictures of initial, intermediate, and final positions of a single movement were presented, with interstimulus intervals that were constant within trials but varied across trials. Movement paths were manipulated by changing the sequential order of body postures. Increasing the path length produced an increase in perceived movement velocity. To produce an implicit measure of apparent movement dynamics, we also asked participants to judge the duration of a frame surrounding the stimuli. Longer paths with higher apparent movement velocity produced shorter perceived durations. This temporal bias was attenuated for nonbody (Experiment 1) and inverted-body (Experiment 2) control stimuli. As an explanation for these findings, we propose an automatic top-down mechanism of biological-motion perception that binds successive body postures into a continuous perception of movement. We show that this mechanism is associated with velocity-dependent temporal compression. Furthermore, this mechanism operates on-line, bridging the intervals between static stimuli, and is specific to configural processing of body form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21525378      PMCID: PMC3693441          DOI: 10.1177/0956797611406446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements.

Authors:  Martin A Giese; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion.

Authors:  Ian M Thornton; Ronald A Rensink; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

4.  Dynamic representations of human body movement.

Authors:  Z Kourtzi; M Shiffrar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed.

Authors:  J J Freyd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-06

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body.

Authors:  P E Downing; Y Jiang; M Shuman; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Perception of human motion.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Maggie Shiffrar
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans.

Authors:  J H Wearden; A Ferrara
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1995-11

10.  Fitts's law holds for action perception.

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Maggie Shiffrar; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02
View more
  16 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Effects of speeding up or slowing down animate or inanimate motions on timing.

Authors:  Mauro Carrozzo; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exposure to multisensory and visual static or moving stimuli enhances processing of nonoptimal visual rhythms.

Authors:  Ourania Tachmatzidou; Nadia Paraskevoudi; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Malleability of time through progress bars and throbbers.

Authors:  Mounia Ziat; Wafa Saoud; Sonja Prychitko; Philip Servos; Simon Grondin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Time perception during apparent biological motion reflects subjective speed of movement, not objective rate of visual stimulation.

Authors:  Guido Orgs; Louise Kirsch; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differences in perceived durations between plausible biological and non-biological stimuli.

Authors:  Giuliana Martinatti Giorjiani; Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli; Marcelo Salvador Caetano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Motor simulation without motor expertise: enhanced corticospinal excitability in visually experienced dance spectators.

Authors:  Corinne Jola; Ali Abedian-Amiri; Annapoorna Kuppuswamy; Frank E Pollick; Marie-Hélène Grosbras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  EEG Frequency Tagging Reveals the Integration of Form and Motion Cues into the Perception of Group Movement.

Authors:  Emiel Cracco; Haeeun Lee; Goedele van Belle; Lisa Quenon; Patrick Haggard; Bruno Rossion; Guido Orgs
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Temporal perception in visual processing as a research tool.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Ting Zhang; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-24

10.  Time perception of visual motion is tuned by the motor representation of human actions.

Authors:  Gioele Gavazzi; Ambra Bisio; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.