BACKGROUND: Inhibiting src kinases (non-receptor tyrosine kinase signaling intermediates) reduces melanoma cell proliferation and invasion. Dasatinib inhibits c-kit, PDGFβR, and EPHA2 and src kinases c-src, c-Yes, Lck, and Fyn. A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in melanoma was conducted to assess response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. METHODS: Adults with stage 3/4 chemotherapy-naïve unresectable melanoma were eligible. Dasatinib was initially administered at 100 mg twice daily continuously to 17 patients. Due to toxicity, the starting dosage was decreased to 70 mg twice daily. Tumor assessments occurred every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, 36 of whom were evaluable for activity and toxicity. Five, 4, and 3 patients had acral-lentiginous, ocular, or mucosal primaries, respectively. Two patients had confirmed partial responses lasting 64 and 24 weeks (RR 5%). Three patients had minor responses lasting 136, 64, and 28 weeks, and 1 patient who was responding discontinued due to noncompliance. The median PFS was 8 weeks; the 6-month PFS rate was 13%. One patient with an exon-13 c-kit mutation had a partial response, whereas disease in another patient with an exon-11 c-kit mutation progressed. Common toxicities were fatigue, dyspnea, and pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Daily dasatinib has minimal activity in unselected melanoma patients, excluding those with c-kit mutations. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoints of 30% response rate or 6-month PFS. Dasatinib was poorly tolerated overall, often requiring dose reduction or interruption. Because activity was observed in a small subset without c-kit mutations, identifying predictive biomarkers is important for future development of dasatinib in melanoma alone or in combination trials. 2010 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Inhibiting src kinases (non-receptor tyrosine kinase signaling intermediates) reduces melanoma cell proliferation and invasion. Dasatinib inhibits c-kit, PDGFβR, and EPHA2 and src kinases c-src, c-Yes, Lck, and Fyn. A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in melanoma was conducted to assess response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. METHODS: Adults with stage 3/4 chemotherapy-naïve unresectable melanoma were eligible. Dasatinib was initially administered at 100 mg twice daily continuously to 17 patients. Due to toxicity, the starting dosage was decreased to 70 mg twice daily. Tumor assessments occurred every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled, 36 of whom were evaluable for activity and toxicity. Five, 4, and 3 patients had acral-lentiginous, ocular, or mucosal primaries, respectively. Two patients had confirmed partial responses lasting 64 and 24 weeks (RR 5%). Three patients had minor responses lasting 136, 64, and 28 weeks, and 1 patient who was responding discontinued due to noncompliance. The median PFS was 8 weeks; the 6-month PFS rate was 13%. One patient with an exon-13 c-kit mutation had a partial response, whereas disease in another patient with an exon-11 c-kit mutation progressed. Common toxicities were fatigue, dyspnea, and pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Daily dasatinib has minimal activity in unselected melanomapatients, excluding those with c-kit mutations. The study did not meet the prespecified endpoints of 30% response rate or 6-month PFS. Dasatinib was poorly tolerated overall, often requiring dose reduction or interruption. Because activity was observed in a small subset without c-kit mutations, identifying predictive biomarkers is important for future development of dasatinib in melanoma alone or in combination trials. 2010 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Louis J Lombardo; Francis Y Lee; Ping Chen; Derek Norris; Joel C Barrish; Kamelia Behnia; Stephen Castaneda; Lyndon A M Cornelius; Jagabandhu Das; Arthur M Doweyko; Craig Fairchild; John T Hunt; Ivan Inigo; Kathy Johnston; Amrita Kamath; David Kan; Herbert Klei; Punit Marathe; Suhong Pang; Russell Peterson; Sidney Pitt; Gary L Schieven; Robert J Schmidt; John Tokarski; Mei-Li Wen; John Wityak; Robert M Borzilleri Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-12-30 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Guilian Niu; Tammy Bowman; Mei Huang; Steve Shivers; Douglas Reintgen; Adil Daud; Alfred Chang; Alan Kraker; Richard Jove; Hua Yu Journal: Oncogene Date: 2002-10-10 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Heikki Joensuu; Peter J Roberts; Burton L Eisenberg; Margaret von Mehren; Christopher D M Fletcher; Katrin Sandau; Karen McDougall; Wen-bin Ou; Chang-Jie Chen; Jonathan A Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-09-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: George D Demetri; Patricia Lo Russo; Iain R J MacPherson; Ding Wang; Jeffrey A Morgan; Valerie G Brunton; Prashni Paliwal; Shruti Agrawal; Maurizio Voi; T R Jeffry Evans Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Scott E Woodman; Jonathan C Trent; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Alexander J Lazar; Sabrina Pricl; Giovanni M Pavan; Maurizio Fermeglia; Y N Vashisht Gopal; Dan Yang; Donald A Podoloff; Doina Ivan; Kevin B Kim; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Patrick Hwu; Gordon B Mills; Michael A Davies Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Wenjin Liu; Kimberly B Monahan; Adam D Pfefferle; Takeshi Shimamura; Jessica Sorrentino; Keefe T Chan; David W Roadcap; David W Ollila; Nancy E Thomas; Diego H Castrillon; C Ryan Miller; Charles M Perou; Kwok-Kin Wong; James E Bear; Norman E Sharpless Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michael E Lidsky; Hiroaki Toshimitsu; Ryan S Turley; Georgia M Beasley; Tomio Ueno; Ketan Sharma; Christina K Augustine; Douglas S Tyler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David S Hong; Goldy C George; Eucharia C Iwuanyanwu; Bahareh Tavana; Gerald S Falchook; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Jennifer J Wheler; Reena H Mistry; Xiudong Lei; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 4.553