BACKGROUND: Src kinase inhibition has been shown to augment the efficacy of chemotherapy. Dasatinib, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of CML, is under investigation as monotherapy for tumors with abnormal Src signaling, such as melanoma. The goal of this study was to determine if Src kinase inhibition using dasatinib could enhance the efficacy of regionally administered melphalan in advanced extremity melanoma. METHODS: The mutational status of c-kit and patterns of gene expression predictive of dysregulated Src kinase signaling were evaluated in a panel of 26 human melanoma cell lines. The effectiveness of dasatinib was measured by quantifying protein expression and activation of Src kinase, focal adhesion kinase, and Crk-associated substrate (p130(CAS)), in conjunction with in vitro cell viability assays using seven melanoma cell lines. Utilizing a rat model of regional chemotherapy, we evaluated the effectiveness of systemic dasatinib in conjunction with regional melphalan against the human melanoma cell line, DM443, grown as a xenograft. RESULTS: Only the WM3211 cell line harbored a c-kit mutation. Significant correlation was observed between Src-predicted dysregulation by gene expression and sensitivity to dasatinib in vitro. Tumor doubling time for DM443 xenografts treated with systemic dasatinib in combination with regional melphalan (44.8 days) was significantly longer (p = 0.007) than either dasatinib (21.3 days) or melphalan alone (24.7 days). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic dasatinib prior to melphalan-based regional chemotherapy markedly improves the efficacy of this alkylating agent in this melanoma xenograft model. Validation of this concept should be considered in the context of a regional therapy clinical trial.
BACKGROUND:Src kinase inhibition has been shown to augment the efficacy of chemotherapy. Dasatinib, a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of CML, is under investigation as monotherapy for tumors with abnormal Src signaling, such as melanoma. The goal of this study was to determine if Src kinase inhibition using dasatinib could enhance the efficacy of regionally administered melphalan in advanced extremity melanoma. METHODS: The mutational status of c-kit and patterns of gene expression predictive of dysregulated Src kinase signaling were evaluated in a panel of 26 humanmelanoma cell lines. The effectiveness of dasatinib was measured by quantifying protein expression and activation of Src kinase, focal adhesion kinase, and Crk-associated substrate (p130(CAS)), in conjunction with in vitro cell viability assays using seven melanoma cell lines. Utilizing a rat model of regional chemotherapy, we evaluated the effectiveness of systemic dasatinib in conjunction with regional melphalan against the humanmelanoma cell line, DM443, grown as a xenograft. RESULTS: Only the WM3211 cell line harbored a c-kit mutation. Significant correlation was observed between Src-predicted dysregulation by gene expression and sensitivity to dasatinib in vitro. Tumor doubling time for DM443 xenografts treated with systemic dasatinib in combination with regional melphalan (44.8 days) was significantly longer (p = 0.007) than either dasatinib (21.3 days) or melphalan alone (24.7 days). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic dasatinib prior to melphalan-based regional chemotherapy markedly improves the efficacy of this alkylating agent in this melanoma xenograft model. Validation of this concept should be considered in the context of a regional therapy clinical trial.
Authors: Louis J Lombardo; Francis Y Lee; Ping Chen; Derek Norris; Joel C Barrish; Kamelia Behnia; Stephen Castaneda; Lyndon A M Cornelius; Jagabandhu Das; Arthur M Doweyko; Craig Fairchild; John T Hunt; Ivan Inigo; Kathy Johnston; Amrita Kamath; David Kan; Herbert Klei; Punit Marathe; Suhong Pang; Russell Peterson; Sidney Pitt; Gary L Schieven; Robert J Schmidt; John Tokarski; Mei-Li Wen; John Wityak; Robert M Borzilleri Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-12-30 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Ryan S Turley; Andrew N Fontanella; James C Padussis; Hiroaki Toshimitsu; Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Eugenia H Cho; Gabi Hanna; Georgia M Beasley; Christina K Augustine; Mark W Dewhirst; Douglas S Tyler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Harriet M Kluger; Arkadiuz Z Dudek; Carrie McCann; Jean Ritacco; Nadine Southard; Lucia B Jilaveanu; Annette Molinaro; Mario Sznol Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Scott E Woodman; Jonathan C Trent; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Alexander J Lazar; Sabrina Pricl; Giovanni M Pavan; Maurizio Fermeglia; Y N Vashisht Gopal; Dan Yang; Donald A Podoloff; Doina Ivan; Kevin B Kim; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Patrick Hwu; Gordon B Mills; Michael A Davies Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: A P Algazi; J S Weber; S C Andrews; P Urbas; P N Munster; R C DeConti; J Hwang; V K Sondak; J L Messina; T McCalmont; A I Daud Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S Ugurel; R Hildenbrand; A Zimpfer; P La Rosée; P Paschka; A Sucker; P Keikavoussi; J C Becker; W Rittgen; A Hochhaus; D Schadendorf Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: María Elisa Picco; María Victoria Castro; María Josefina Quezada; Gastón Barbero; María Belén Villanueva; Natalia Brenda Fernández; Hyungsoo Kim; Pablo Lopez-Bergami Journal: Cell Biosci Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 7.133