Literature DB >> 19789325

Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of dasatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

George D Demetri1, Patricia Lo Russo, Iain R J MacPherson, Ding Wang, Jeffrey A Morgan, Valerie G Brunton, Prashni Paliwal, Shruti Agrawal, Maurizio Voi, T R Jeffry Evans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and recommended phase II dose of dasatinib in metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or for which no effective standard therapy exists. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In this phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received 35 to 160 mg of dasatinib twice daily in 28-day cycles either every 12 hours for 5 consecutive days followed by 2 nontreatment days every week (5D2) or as continuous, twice-daily (CDD) dosing.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were treated (5D2, n = 33; CDD, n = 34). The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg twice daily 5D2 and 70 mg twice daily CDD. DLTs with 160 mg 5D2 were recurrent grade 2 rash, grade 3 lethargy, and one patient with both grade 3 prolonged bleeding time and grade 3 hypocalcemia; DLTs with 120 mg twice daily CDD were grade 3 nausea, grade 3 fatigue, and one patient with both grade 3 rash and grade 2 proteinuria. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities across all doses were nausea, fatigue, lethargy, anorexia, proteinuria, and diarrhea, with infrequent hematologic toxicities. Pharmacokinetic data indicated rapid absorption, dose proportionality, and lack of drug accumulation. Although no objective tumor responses were seen, durable stable disease was observed in 16% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Dasatinib was well tolerated in this population, with a safety profile similar to that observed previously in leukemia patients, although with much less hematologic toxicity. Limited, although encouraging, preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed. Doses of 120 mg twice daily (5D2) or 70 mg twice daily (CDD) are recommended for further studies in patients with solid tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19789325     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  67 in total

Review 1.  SRC: a century of science brought to the clinic.

Authors:  Alexey Aleshin; Richard S Finn
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 3.  Correlations between imatinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, adherence, and clinical response in advanced metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): an emerging role for drug blood level testing?

Authors:  Margaret von Mehren; Nicolas Widmer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  STAT-Related Profiles Are Associated with Patient Response to Targeted Treatments in Locally Advanced SCCHN.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Sofia Lambaki; Despina Televantou; Anna Kalogera-Fountzila; Angelos Nikolaou; Konstantinos Markou; Despina Misailidou; Konstantinos N Syrigos; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 5.  Allosteric Inhibition of ABL Kinases: Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.

Authors:  Jill K Jones; Eric M Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  A window-of-opportunity clinical trial of dasatinib in women with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Linda R Duska; Gina R Petroni; Heather Lothamer; William Faust; Jan H Beumer; Susan M Christner; Anne M Mills; Paula M Fracasso; Sarah J Parsons
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Soft tissue sarcoma clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Laurence H Baker; Derrick Beech; Robert Benjamin; Ephraim S Casper; Ernest U Conrad; Thomas F DeLaney; David S Ettinger; Martin J Heslin; Ray J Hutchinson; Krystyna Kiel; William G Kraybill; G Douglas Letson; James Neff; Richard J O'Donnell; I Benjamin Paz; Raphael E Pollock; R Lor Randall; Karen D Schupak; Douglas S Tyler; Margaret von Mehren; Jeffrey Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation of protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) protects the salivary gland from radiation damage.

Authors:  Sten M Wie; Tariq S Adwan; James DeGregori; Steven M Anderson; Mary E Reyland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Inhibition of c-Kit by tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Allison Galanis; Mark Levis
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 10.  Src signaling pathways in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Varkaris; Anastasia D Katsiampoura; John C Araujo; Gary E Gallick; Paul G Corn
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.