Two new pathogens, Guignardia korthalsellae and Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae, are described from New Zealand's pygmy mistletoes (Korthalsella, Viscaceae). Both form ascomata on living phylloclades with minimal disruption of the tissue. Fungal hyphae within the phylloclade are primarily intercellular. Guignardia korthalsellae disrupts a limited number of epidermal cells immediately around the erumpent ascoma, while the ascomata of Rosenscheldiellakorthalsellae develop externally on small patches of stromatic tissue that form above stomatal cavities. Rosenscheldiella is applied in a purely morphological sense. LSU sequences show that R. korthalsellae as well as another New Zealand species, Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis, are members of the Mycosphaerellaceaesensu stricto. Genetically, Rosenscheldiella, in the sense we are using it, is polyphyletic; LSU and ITS sequences place the two New Zealand species in different clades within the Mycosphaerellaceae. Rosenscheldiella is retained for these fungi until generic relationships within the family are resolved. Whether or not the type species of Rosenscheldiella, R. styracis, is also a member of the Mycosphaerellaceae is not known, but it has a similar morphology and relationship to its host as the two New Zealand species.
Two new pathogens, Guignardia korthalsellae and Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae, are described from New Zealand's pygmy mistletoes (Korthalsella, Viscaceae). Both form ascomata on living phylloclades with minimal disruption of the tissue. Fungal hyphae within the phylloclade are primarily intercellular. Guignardia korthalsellae disrupts a limited number of epidermal cells immediately around the erumpent ascoma, while the ascomata of Rosenscheldiellakorthalsellae develop externally on small patches of stromatic tissue that form above stomatal cavities. Rosenscheldiella is applied in a purely morphological sense. LSU sequences show that R. korthalsellae as well as another New Zealand species, Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis, are members of the Mycosphaerellaceaesensu stricto. Genetically, Rosenscheldiella, in the sense we are using it, is polyphyletic; LSU and ITS sequences place the two New Zealand species in different clades within the Mycosphaerellaceae. Rosenscheldiella is retained for these fungi until generic relationships within the family are resolved. Whether or not the type species of Rosenscheldiella, R. styracis, is also a member of the Mycosphaerellaceae is not known, but it has a similar morphology and relationship to its host as the two New Zealand species.
The pygmy mistletoes of New Zealand belong to the genus
Korthalsella in the family Viscaceae. Species of
Korthalsella are leafless, aerial hemiparasites, having terete or
flattened internodes with minute, unisexual flowers borne on the tip of
internodes in the axils of rudimentary leaves or on specialised inflorescence
branches. Korthalsella has an unusual, scattered, and discontinuous
distribution with high levels of species and sectional diversity in Malesia
extending from Hawaii, the Marquesas and Henderson Island in the east, to
Ethiopia and Madagascar in the west, and from Japan in the north, to Australia
and New Zealand in the south (Barlow
1983, Molvray
1997, Burrows
1996). Barlow
(1997) estimated that there may
be as many as 25 species. Molvray
(1997) reduced the number of
species to eight; however, her classification is not generally accepted and
was not adopted by Barlow
(1997) or Wagner et
al. (1999) in monographs
of the floras of Malesia and Hawaii respectively.New Zealand is home to three pygmy mistletoe species, Korthalsella
salicornioides, K. clavata, and K. lindsayi, although there is
debate about the taxonomic status of the latter two as separate species (see
Danser 1940,
Molvray 1997,
Molvray ).
Korthalsella salicornioides mainly occurs on Leptospermum
scoparium and Kunzea spp. (Myrtaceae) and has also been
recorded on the introduced Erica lusitanica and E. vagans
(Ericaceae, Bannister
1989). Korthalsella clavata is known on Aristotelia
fruticosa (Eleocarpaceae), Coprosma propinqua, C. wallii (Rubiaceae), and
Discaria toumatou (Rhamnaceae). While the main host for K.
lindsayi is Melicope simplex, it also occurs on
Coprosma spp., Lophomyrtus obcordata (Myrtaceae), and
Myrsine divaricata (Myrsinaceae). Korthalsella salicornioides occurs
throughout the North and South Islands and on Stewart Island. Korthalsella
clavata and K. lindsayi occur throughout the South Island and
the southern half of the North Island. Korthalsella salicornioides
may have an even broader range. Barlow
(1996) reports it from New
Caledonia; Molvray (1997)
includes K. madagascarica from Madagascar as a synonym of K.
salicornioides. K. salicornioides is classified as “at
risk-sparse” in the threatened and uncommon plants list for New Zealand
(de Lange ) and K. clavata is regarded as a regionally
threatened plant in Wellington Conservancy
(Anonymous 2001).The only fungi reported previously from Korthalsella have been
from Hawaii, specifically Cucurbitaria obducens (as Teichospora
obducens), Echidnodes visci
(Petrak 1953), Meliola
visci (Stevens 1925), and
Pleospora sp. (Kliejunas ).This paper describes two new stem parasites on Korthalsella spp.
from New Zealand. The phylogenetic position of Rosenscheldiella
korthalsellae sp. nov. and another New Zealand species, R.
brachyglottidis, is determined on the basis of ITS and LSU sequences. The
genus was placed in the Venturiaceae by Kirk et al.
(2008), although Sivanesan
& Shivas (2002) referred
it to the Mycosphaerellaceae in a paper in which they described
R. dysoxyli, a species with erumpent ascomata morphologically
reminiscent of typical Mycosphaerella spp.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphological studies
Specimens were examined from dried collections; asci and ascospores are
described from squash mounts following rehydration in water or 3 % KOH.
Ascomata and conidiomata were sectioned at a thickness of about 10 μm using
a freezing microtome and sections were mounted in lactic acid for light
microscopy. All collections have been deposited in the New Zealand Fungal and
Plant Disease Herbarium (PDD).
Molecular analyses
Guignardia
DNA was extracted using REDExtract-N-Amp Plant PCR Kits (Sigma, USA) from
small pieces of tissue taken from within three individual fruiting bodies from
three different infected plants stored as dried herbarium specimens, following
the removal of the upper surface of the fruiting body. The tissue was ground
in extraction buffer with a plastic pestle in the Eppendorf tube, then DNA
extraction and PCR were carried out following the manufacturer's instructions.
ITS sequences were obtained separately from each extract following the methods
of Johnston & Park (2005)
using ITS1F and ITS4 amplification primers
(White ,
Gardes & Bruns 1993).
Using ClustalW (Larkin ) our newly generated ITS sequences were aligned with
sequences deposited in GenBank from taxa representing the genetic diversity of
Phyllosticta as reported by Okane et al.
(2003) and Rodrigues et
al. (2004)
(Table 1). Botryosphaeria
dothidea was selected as the outgroup following Crous et al.
(2006b) who showed
Phyllosticta sensu stricto to be monophyletic and have a sister
relationship with Botryosphaeria. Taxa in more distantly related
clades of the Botryosphaeriaceae could not be reliably aligned. The
599-bp-long alignment has been deposited in TreeBase. A 70-bp segment near the
start of the alignment could not be reliably aligned and was excluded from the
analyses as was the 5.8S part of the alignment, because this was not available
for all of the sequences deposited in GenBank, leaving 425 characters in the
analyses. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using Bayesian maximum
liklelihood in MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck
& Ronquist 2001) and a heuristic maximum likelihood analysis
in PAUP v. 4.01b (Swofford
2002) with the GTR+I+G model, selected using the AIC method in
MrModelTest v. 2.3 (Posada & Crandall
1998, Posada & Buckley
2004). The Bayesian analysis was run with two chains for 10 M
generations, trees sampled every 1 000 generations with a burn-in of 10 %.
Bayesian posterior probabilities were obtained from 50 % majority rule
consensus trees. The PAUP ML analysis used addition sequence random and TBR
branch swapping with 100 replicates to avoid local optima. A bootstrap
analysis used the ML tree as a starting tree; each of the 100 bootstrap
samples run with a single replicate.
Table 1.
Isolates included in the phylogenetic analyses of Guignardia.
Fungus1
Isolate voucher
number2
GenBank accession number
Host and geographic origin of voucher
Guignardia aesculi
CBS 756.70
AB095504
Aesculus hippocastanum, Netherlands
Guignardia bidwellii
IFO 9466
AB095509
Parthenocissus tricuspidata, Japan
Guignardia citricarpa
IMI 304799
AY042917
Citrus aurantiacum, India
CBS 102374
FJ824767
Citrus aurantiacum, Brazil
Guignardia gaultheriae
CBS 447.70
AB095506
Gaultheria humifusa, Netherlands
Guignardia korthalsellae
PDD 94884
FJ655899*
Korthalsella lindsayi, New Zealand
Guignardia mangiferae
IFO 33119
AB041233
Rhododendron sp., Japan
ETH 02038
AY277711
Anarcardium giganteum, Brazil
Guignardia philoprina
CBS 174.77
AB095507
Cryptomeria japonica, Netherlands
CBS 447.68
AF312014
Taxus baccata, USA
Guignardia vaccinii
CBS 126.22
AB095508
Oxycoccus macrocarpos, Netherlands
Phyllosticta beaumarisii
CBS 535.87
AY042927
Muehlenbeckia adpressa, Australia
Phyllosticta eugeniae
CBS 445.82
AY042925
Eugenia aromatica, Indonesia
Phyllosticta hypoglossi
CBS 434.92
AY042923
Ruscus aculeatus, Italy
Phyllosticta owaniana
CBS 776.97
AF312011
Brabejum stellatifolium, South Africa
Phyllosticta podocarpi
CBS 111647
AF312013
Podocarpus lanceolata, South Africa
Phyllosticta pyrolae
–
AF312010
Pyrola sp., USA
IFO 32652
AB041242
Erica carnea, Japan
Phyllosticta spinarum
IMI 070028
AY042907 and AY042908
Japan
CBS 292.90
AF312009
Chamaecyparis pisifera, France
Phyllosticta telopeae
DAR 60749
AY042909 and AY042910
Telopea speciosissima, Australia
Sequences newly generated for this study.
Names used are those cited in GenBank.
CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; DAR,
Plant Pathology Herbarium, Orange, Australia; IFO: Inst. for Fermentation
Culture Collection, Osaka, Japan; IMI: International Mycological Institute,
CABI, United Kingdom; PDD: The New Zealand Fungal Herbarium, Landcare
Research, Auckland, New Zealand; ETH: ETH Culture Collection, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Isolates included in the phylogenetic analyses of Guignardia.Sequences newly generated for this study.Names used are those cited in GenBank.CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; DAR,
Plant Pathology Herbarium, Orange, Australia; IFO: Inst. for Fermentation
Culture Collection, Osaka, Japan; IMI: International Mycological Institute,
CABI, United Kingdom; PDD: The New Zealand Fungal Herbarium, Landcare
Research, Auckland, New Zealand; ETH: ETH Culture Collection, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rosenscheldiella
DNA was extracted from dried herbarium specimens using the same methods as
for Guignardia. Tissue was extracted separately from seven individual
pseudothecia taken from several different plants collected from two separate
sites for Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae and from individual
pseudothecia taken from three different leaves from a fresh collection of
R. brachyglottidis (PDD 94939). ITS sequences were generated using
the same primers as Guignardia and LSU using LROR and LR5
(Bunyard ,
Vilgalys & Hester 1990).
Our newly generated ITS and LSU sequences were aligned with sequences
deposited in GenBank from taxa representing the genetic diversity of
Mycosphaerellaceae as reported in recent papers (e.g.
Arzanlou ,
Crous et al. 2006a,
2007) as well as the specimens
that formed the closest matches for R. brachyglottidis and R.
korthalsellae in a GenBank BLAST search. In all cases the fungi included
in the analysis had both ITS and LSU sequences available from the same voucher
specimen, and the vouchers are available through public collections
(Table 2). Davidiella
tassiana was chosen as the outgroup following Crous et al.
(2007) who showed the
Davidiellaceae to be basal within the Capnodiales to
Mycosphaerellaceae plus Teratosphaeriaceae. The alignment
has been deposited in TreeBase. Several short segments within the ITS could
not be reliably aligned and these were excluded from subsequent analyses,
leaving 1384 characters. Phylogenetic analyses followed the procedure
described for Guignardia using the GTR+I+G model as selected by
MrModelTest.
Table 2.
Isolates included in the phylogenetic analyses of
Rosenscheldiella.
Fungus1
Isolate voucher
number2
GenBank accession number (ITS, LSU)
Host and geographic origin of voucher
Cercospora apii
CBS 536.71
AY752133, AY152629
-
Cercospora beticola
CBS 116456
AY840527, DQ678091
Beta vulgaris, Italy
Davidiella tassiana
STE-U 5101
AY251078, AY342092
CCA-treated Douglas-fir pole, USA
Mycosphaerella aurantia
CBS 110500
AY725531, DQ246256
Eucalyptus globulus, Australia
Mycosphaerella buckinghamiae
CBS 112175
EU707856, EU707856
Buckinghamia sp., Australia
Mycosphaerella colombiensis
CMW 11255
DQ239993, DQ204745
Eucalyptus sp., Colombia
Mycosphaerella communis
CBS 110976
AY725537, DQ246261
Eucalyptus sp., South Africa
Mycosphaerella fori
CMW 9096
DQ267581, DQ204749
Eucalyptus grandis, South Africa
Mycosphaerella graminicola
CBS 100335
EU019297, EU019297
Triticum aestivum, The Netherlands
Mycosphaerella grandis
CMW 8554
DQ267584, DQ246240
Eucalyptus globulus, Chile
Mycosphaerella heimii
CPC 15429
EU882122, EU882141
Eucalyptus sp., Thailand
Mycosphaerella lateralis
CBS 111169
AY725550, DQ246260
Eucalyptus globulus, Zambia
Mycosphaerella pini
ATCC 28973
EF114684, EF114697
Pinus ponderosa, USA
Mycosphaerella punctata
CBS 113315
EU167582, EU167582
Syzygium cordatum, South Africa
Mycosphaerella walkeri
CMW 20333
DQ267593, DQ267574
Eucalyptus globulus, Chile
Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii
CBS 267.37
EF114685, EF114698
Pseudotsuga menziesii, Germany
Pseudocercospora natalensis
CBS 111069
DQ303077, DQ267576
Eucalyptus nitens, South Africa
Pseudocercospora paraguayensis
CBS 111286
DQ267602, DQ204764
Eucalyptus nitens, Brasil
Pseudocercospora vitis
CPC 11595
DQ073923, DQ073923
Vitis vinifera, South Africa
Readeriella novae-zelandiae
CBS 114357
DQ267603, DQ246239
Eucalyptus botryoides, New Zealand
Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis
PDD 94939
GQ355335*,
GQ355334*
Brachyglottis repanda, New Zealand
Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae
PDD 94885
GQ355332*,
GQ355333*
Korthalsella lindsayi, New Zealand
Teratosphaeria mexicana
CBS 110502
AY725558, DQ246237
Eucalyptus globulus, Australia
Teratosphaeria nubilosa
CBS 116005
AY725572, EU019304
Eucalyptus globulus, Australia
Sequences newly generated for this study.
Names used are those cited in GenBank.
ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, USA; CBS: Centraalbureau
voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture collection of
Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; CMW: Culture collection of Mike Wingfield, housed
at FABI, Pretoria, South Africa; PDD: The New Zealand Fungal Herbarium,
Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; STE-U: Culture collection of
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Isolates included in the phylogenetic analyses of
Rosenscheldiella.Sequences newly generated for this study.Names used are those cited in GenBank.ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, USA; CBS: Centraalbureau
voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture collection of
Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; CMW: Culture collection of Mike Wingfield, housed
at FABI, Pretoria, South Africa; PDD: The New Zealand Fungal Herbarium,
Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; STE-U: Culture collection of
Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Phylogenetic analyses
Identical sequences were obtained from all three fruiting bodies of
Guignardia korthalsellae; one has been deposited as GenBank FJ655899.
Phylogenetic analysis shows that G. korthalsellae groups most closely
with the Vitaceae-associated G. bidwellii, the
Eugenia-associated P. eugeniae, and the
Muehlenbeckia-associated P. beaumarisii
(Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Maximum likelihood tree from the PAUP analysis (Ln = –2273.33147)
based on ITS sequences from Guignardia korthalsellae (PDD 94884,
GenBank FJ655899) and GenBank data from other species of Guignardia
and Phyllosticta, (Table
1) representing the genetic diversity accepted for these fungi by
Okane et al. (2003)
and Rodrigues et al.
(2004). Bootstrap values shown
above the branches where greater then 50 % and Bayesian posterior
probabilities below the branches where 0.90 or above. Tree rooted with
Botryosphaeria dothidea as outgroup.
For both of the species of Rosenscheldiella sequenced, all samples
from each of the species had matching DNA sequences, making it unlikely that a
contaminating fungus had been sequenced.Based on these sequences R. brachyglottidis and R.
korthalsellae are members of the Mycosphaerellaceae sensu Crous
et al. (2007,
2009). Micromorphologically
these two species are similar to Mycosphaerella, with fissitunicate,
fasciculate asci, hamathecial elements lacking or poorly developed, and
ascospores 1-septate, slightly constricted at septum, upper cell slightly
wider than the lower. However, the anatomy of the ascomata and their
relationship to the host tissue is unusual for the
Mycosphaerellaceae. In both R. brachyglottidis and R.
korthalsellae, as well as R. styracis, the type species of the
genus, groups of pseudothecia develop externally to the host leaf or
phylloclade on small pads of stromatic tissue that develop superficially from
hyphae growing through the stomata. Within the leaf, the substomatal cavity is
tightly packed with hyphae, but otherwise the hyphae are confined to leaf
tissue in the immediate vicinity of the fruiting body and are always
intercellular. Unusual for Mycosphaerellaceae, the host leaves show
little or no symptoms beyond the presence of the fruiting bodies. This
relationship to the host leaf with development of pseudothecia superficially
on small pads of stromatic tissue growing from stomata is the same as has been
described for Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii, a pathogen of Douglas fir
(Stone ).
Like Rosenscheldiella, Phaeocryptopus is a member of the
Mycosphaerellaceae (Winton ).Although Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis, R. korthalsellae, and
Phaeocryptopus gaeumannii share a similar morphology, they are
phylogenetically distinct within the Mycosphaerellaceae. Of the taxa
sampled in this study, R. korthalsellae forms a sister relationship
with Mycosphaerella aurantii, M. buckinghamiae and M. pini, P.
gaeumannii forms a sister relationship with Mycosphaerella
heimii, and R. brachyglottidis forms no close relationship with
other sampled species (Fig. 2).
The distinctive biology and morphology shown by these three species has
evolved several times within the Mycosphaerellaceae. These fungi are
retained in Rosenscheldiella and Phaeocryptopus for the time
being, awaiting resolution of generic relationships within the family.
Fig. 2.
Maximum likelihood tree from the PAUP analysis (Ln = –5475.66915)
based on LSU and ITS sequences from Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis
and R. korthalsellae, together with GenBank data from related
Mycosphaerella species (Table
2). Bootstrap values shown above the branches where greater than
50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities below the branches where 0.90 or
above. Tree rooted with Davidiella tassiana as outgroup.
Maximum likelihood tree from the PAUP analysis (Ln = –2273.33147)
based on ITS sequences from Guignardia korthalsellae (PDD 94884,
GenBank FJ655899) and GenBank data from other species of Guignardia
and Phyllosticta, (Table
1) representing the genetic diversity accepted for these fungi by
Okane et al. (2003)
and Rodrigues et al.
(2004). Bootstrap values shown
above the branches where greater then 50 % and Bayesian posterior
probabilities below the branches where 0.90 or above. Tree rooted with
Botryosphaeria dothidea as outgroup.Maximum likelihood tree from the PAUP analysis (Ln = –5475.66915)
based on LSU and ITS sequences from Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis
and R. korthalsellae, together with GenBank data from related
Mycosphaerella species (Table
2). Bootstrap values shown above the branches where greater than
50 % and Bayesian posterior probabilities below the branches where 0.90 or
above. Tree rooted with Davidiella tassiana as outgroup.Guignardia korthalsellae A. Infected plant. B. Detail of infected
internode showing gregarious fruiting bodies. C. Ascoma in vertical section.
D. Detail of dark, upper part of wall of ascoma near ostiole. E. Detail of
lower, pale part of wall of ascoma. F. Ascus and developing ascospores. G.
Released ascospores. A, F = PDD 65953, B–E, G = PDD 94922. Scale bars:
A–B = 1 mm, C = 50 μm, D–G = 20 μm.
TAXONOMY
A. Sultan, P.R. Johnst., D.C. Park
& A.W. Robertson, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB514115. Figs
3,
4.
Fig. 3.
Guignardia korthalsellae A. Infected plant. B. Detail of infected
internode showing gregarious fruiting bodies. C. Ascoma in vertical section.
D. Detail of dark, upper part of wall of ascoma near ostiole. E. Detail of
lower, pale part of wall of ascoma. F. Ascus and developing ascospores. G.
Released ascospores. A, F = PDD 65953, B–E, G = PDD 94922. Scale bars:
A–B = 1 mm, C = 50 μm, D–G = 20 μm.
Fig. 4.
Guignardia korthalsellae A. Conidioma in vertical section. B. Wall
of conidioma with conidiogenous cells. C. Conidia. D. Conidiogenous cells and
conidia of spermatial Leptodothiorella state. E. Fungal hyphae within
phylloclade between hypodermal cells. F. Fungal hyphae within phylloclade,
showing broad, plate-like layer of hyphae between hypodermal cells. A, B, E, F
= PDD 65953; C, D = PDD 94922. Scale bars: A = 50 μm, B–F = 20
μm.
Etymology: korthalsellae refers to the genus of the host
plant. Ab G. bidwellii ascosporis 19–27.5 × 8–11
μm, habitanti Korthalsella lindsayi differens.: New Zealand, Wanganui, vic. Palmerston
North, Coles Bush, living internodes of Korthalsella lindsayi, 22
Nov. 2008, A. Sultan, PDD 94922.Guignardia korthalsellae A. Conidioma in vertical section. B. Wall
of conidioma with conidiogenous cells. C. Conidia. D. Conidiogenous cells and
conidia of spermatial Leptodothiorella state. E. Fungal hyphae within
phylloclade between hypodermal cells. F. Fungal hyphae within phylloclade,
showing broad, plate-like layer of hyphae between hypodermal cells. A, B, E, F
= PDD 65953; C, D = PDD 94922. Scale bars: A = 50 μm, B–F = 20
μm.Ascomata and conidiomata 0.15–0.40 mm diam, black, globose,
erumpent, with a single, round, apical, nonpapillate ostiole, solitary or
often coalescing, gregarious, developing on flattened, leaf-like internodes of
living plants, rarely associated with obvious chlorotic or necrotic symptoms,
indistinct chlorotic halos sometimes seen on heavily infected leaves. Fruiting
bodies develop within epidermal layer, breaking down 3–4 epidermal
cells, with immediately adjacent hypodermal cells pushed aside. Otherwise,
host tissue disrupted to a minimal extent, fungal hyphae within plant
restricted to plate-like layers of hyaline, thin-walled hyphae developing
between 2–3 layers of host hypodermal cells and between cuticle and
epidermal cells adjacent to fruiting bodies. Ascomatal and conidiomatal
wall 20–25 μm thick, comprising 4–5 layers of
short-cylindric cells 3–5 μm diam, with cell walls slightly
thickened, hyaline in lower part, darkened in upper part, innermost layers of
cells narrower, thinner-walled; cells adjacent to ostiole angular to globose
with walls thick and dark. Groups of fruiting bodies may be entirely
ascomatal, entirely conidiomatal, or have a mixture of both forms. Spermatial
conidiomata sometimes also present. Asci clavate, bitunicate,
65–100 × 18–20 μm, attenuated at base to a short stipe,
8-spored. Ascospores ellipsoid, 19–27.5 × 8–11
μm, hyaline, 0-septate, no gelatinous sheaths or caps observed.
Pseudoparaphysoid-like elements broad-cylindric, thin-walled, absent in mature
ascomata.Conidiogenous cells lining entire inner layer of conidiomata,
solitary, cylindrical to lageniform, 6–14 × 4.5–5 μm,
wall not thickened at single, apical conidiogenous locus. Conidia
13–15 × 7–9 μm, ellipsoid to clavoid, apex broadly
rounded, base truncate, 0-septate, hyaline, surrounded by a thin gelatinous
sheath, with a gelatinous, tapering apical appendage
(4–)6–9(–20) μm long.Spermatial state Leptodothiorella with conidiogenous cells
cylindric, 7.5–10 × 3–5 μm, wall thickened at single,
apical conidiogenous locus, in groups of 2–3 on a single,
short-cylindric basal cell. Microconidia 5.5–7 × 2 μm,
straight, dumbbell-shaped, 0-septate, hyaline.Habitat: On living internodes of Korthalsella lindsayi.
Ascomata more common in summer, conidiomata in winter and spring. A
macroscopically similar fungus was observed on K. clavata, but no
collections were made and its identity was not confirmed.Distribution: New Zealand.Additional specimens examined. New Zealand, Wanganui, vic.
Palmerston North, Coles Bush, living internodes of Korthalsella
lindsayi, Oct. 2008, A. Sultan, PDD 94884; Wanganui, vic. Palmerston
North, Coles Bush, living internodes of K. lindsayi, 23 Dec. 2008, A.
Sultan, PDD 95152; Bay of Plenty, Paengaroa Scenic Reserve, living internodes
of K. lindsayi, Oct./Nov. 2008, A. Sultan, PDD 94900; Mid Canterbury,
Christchurch, Riccarton Bush, on living internodes of K. lindsayi, 11
Apr. 1996, R.C. Close, PDD 65953.Notes: this fungus is probably common on Korthalsella
lindsayi throughout its range. No Guignardia or
Phyllosticta spp. have been previously reported from
Korthalsella. Phyllosticta phoradendri reported on
Phoradendron, another member of the Viscaceae from
California (Bonar 1942), was
not accepted in the genus by van der Aa & Vanev
(2002); these authors
considered it to be probably an Asteromella-like species. De Lange
(1997) reported a
Phyllosticta sp. on the loranthaceous mistletoe Ileostylus
micranthus in New Zealand. We could find no literature report or voucher
specimen to support this record and suspect it may have been a miscitation of
the host of PDD 65953, K. lindsayi, the only mistletoe-associated
specimen of Phyllosticta available in 1997.Guignardia and its anamorph Phyllosticta is monophyletic
within the Botryosphaeriaceae
(Crous ).
Within Guignardia, G. korthalsellae is genetically distinct from the
geographically widespread, biologically unspecialised G. mangiferae
and from all other Guignardia spp. represented in recent phylogenetic
studies (Fig. 1). However, many
species have no molecular data available, and acceptance of the species
described here as new is based in part on its host preference. Although recent
studies (e.g. Rodrigues ) have shown that some Phyllosticta species
isolated as symptomless endophytes may have a broad host range, the biological
relationship between these fungi and the hosts from which they have been
isolated is poorly understood. In a study based on herbarium specimens, van
der Aa (1973) considered most
Phyllosticta species to be host specialised pathogens. Guignardia
korthalsellae develops within living host tissue but causes minimal
damage. This apparently highly developed biological relationship supports the
likelihood of host specialisation in this case.G.F. Laundon & Sivan.
in Laundon, New Zealand J. Bot. 9: 619. 1972 [1971].
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis A. Infections on underside of
leaf, several patches of gregarious pseudothecia. B. Single infection,
pseudothecia associated with reddish patch amongst leaf hairs on underside of
leaf. C. Pseudothecia in vertical section, fungal hyphae arising from several
adjacent stomata, guard cells of stomata indicated by asterisks, and forming
poorly differentiated stromatic base on which pseudothecia are held. D.
Pseudothecia in vertical section. E. Detail of base of ascoma in vertical
section, fungal hyphae emerging from substomatal cavity, guard cells of stoma
indicated by asterisks, and forming stromatic pad on leaf surface. F. Detail
of ostiole in vertical section. G. Extensive network of intercellular hyphae
within host leaf; base of pseudothecia visible amongst leaf hairs above intact
epidermal layer of leaf. A, B = PDD 94939; C–G = PDD 50727. Scale bars:
A = 5 mm; B = 1 mm; C, D, G = 20 μm; E, F = 10 μm.
Ascomata develop within dense tomentum of hairs on underside of
leaves, no visible symptoms on upper surface. Ascomata with one or a small
number of black-walled pseudothecia, up to about 0.1 mm diam, held on a
stroma-like structure comprising a small group of hyaline to pale brown,
globose to angular cells that arise from hyphae growing through leaf stomata.
Ascomata generally develop in gregarious groups of 10–20,
forming patches up to about 5 mm diam. Hyaline, thin-walled fungal hyphae
ramify amongst leaf tomentum adjacent to ascomata. Internally, host
substomatal cavity packed with hyaline, thin-walled fungal hyphae, extensive
plates of hyphae between host cells close to substomatal cavity.
Hamathecium lacking. Asci fissitunicate, subsaccate with a
small basal foot, 8-spored. Ascospores 16–22 × 5–6
μm, ellipsoid, 1-septate, slightly constricted at median septum,
hyaline.Specimens examined: New Zealand, Wellington, Levin,
Waiopehu Reserve, on Brachyglottis repanda, 27 Dec. 1969, G.F.
Laundon, PDD 50728, holotype; Wellington, Levin, Waiopehu Reserve, on B.
repanda, 5 Apr. 1969, G.F. Laundon, PDD 50727; Auckland, Waitakere
Ranges, roadside near Rose Hellaby House, on B. repanda, 8 Dec. 2008,
P.R. Johnston & E.M. Gibellini, PDD 94939.A. Sultan, P.R. Johnst.,
D.C. Park & A.W. Robertson, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB514116,
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae A. Infected internodes. B. Detail
showing immature, reddish ascomata. C. Detail of B. D. Infected internode
densely covered with mature, blackish ascomata. E. Detail of D. F. Ascoma in
vertical section, pseudothecium on pad of stromatic tissue developing above
stoma. G. Pad of stromatic tissue above stoma, fungal hyphae packing
substomatal cavity but otherwise sparse within the internode. H. Detail of G.
I. Hymenium, squash mount showing loose, more or less globose cells of
hamathecial tissue. J. Detail of hamathecial cells. K. Asci. L. Ascospores.
PDD 94885. Scale bars: A, B, D = 2 mm; C, E = 0.5 mm; F = 100 μm; G, I, K =
20 μm; H, J, L = 10 μm.
Etymology: korthalsellae refers to genus of the host
plant.Ab R. styracis ascosporis 21.5–27 × 4.5–6 μm,
habitanti Korthalsella lindsayi differens.: New Zealand, Rangitikei, vic. Taihape,
Paengaroa Scenic Reserve, on living internodes of Korthalsella
lindsayi, 3 Nov. 2008, A. Sultan, PDD 94885.Ascomata develop superficially, with one to several globose,
dark-walled pseudothecia forming on small pads of reddish stromatic tissue
above stomata in host phylloclade, stroma forming from hyphae that emerge
through stomata. Infected areas of host with large numbers of stromatic pads
and their associated pseudothecia. Basal stroma comprising more or less
globose cells 5–7 μm diam, with walls thin, pale, encrusted with
small, reddish crystals. Irregular, short strands of hyphae, 3–5 μm
diam with reddish contents, radiating away from stromata across host surface.
Stromata arise from hyphae that extend through phylloclade stomata
from substomatal cavity packed with hyaline, thin-walled fungal cells. Hyphae
within phylloclade otherwise sparse and intercellular, confined to immediate
area around ascomata. Pseudothecia initially reddish, darker with
age, 100–150 μm diam, in vertical section wall 15–20 μm
thick, comprising 4–5 layers of short-cylindric cells, towards inside of
wall cells narrower and hyaline, towards outside wider, walls encrusted with
dark brown material. Ostiole apical, round, non-papillate, surrounded
by a few short-cylindric, outwardly projecting cells. Hamathecium of
short-cylindric to globose cells arranged amongst asci more or less in loose
columns. Asci 55–70 × 12–14 μm, fissitunicate,
cylindric to clavate with a short, foot-like base, 8-spored, overlapping
2–3 seriate. Ascospores 21.5–27 × 4.5–6
μm, cylindric, straight, hyaline, 1-septate, upper cell slightly wider than
lower, slightly constricted at septum.Rosenscheldiella brachyglottidis A. Infections on underside of
leaf, several patches of gregarious pseudothecia. B. Single infection,
pseudothecia associated with reddish patch amongst leaf hairs on underside of
leaf. C. Pseudothecia in vertical section, fungal hyphae arising from several
adjacent stomata, guard cells of stomata indicated by asterisks, and forming
poorly differentiated stromatic base on which pseudothecia are held. D.
Pseudothecia in vertical section. E. Detail of base of ascoma in vertical
section, fungal hyphae emerging from substomatal cavity, guard cells of stoma
indicated by asterisks, and forming stromatic pad on leaf surface. F. Detail
of ostiole in vertical section. G. Extensive network of intercellular hyphae
within host leaf; base of pseudothecia visible amongst leaf hairs above intact
epidermal layer of leaf. A, B = PDD 94939; C–G = PDD 50727. Scale bars:
A = 5 mm; B = 1 mm; C, D, G = 20 μm; E, F = 10 μm.Habitat: On living internodes of all three Korthalsella
spp. in New Zealand.Rosenscheldiella korthalsellae A. Infected internodes. B. Detail
showing immature, reddish ascomata. C. Detail of B. D. Infected internode
densely covered with mature, blackish ascomata. E. Detail of D. F. Ascoma in
vertical section, pseudothecium on pad of stromatic tissue developing above
stoma. G. Pad of stromatic tissue above stoma, fungal hyphae packing
substomatal cavity but otherwise sparse within the internode. H. Detail of G.
I. Hymenium, squash mount showing loose, more or less globose cells of
hamathecial tissue. J. Detail of hamathecial cells. K. Asci. L. Ascospores.
PDD 94885. Scale bars: A, B, D = 2 mm; C, E = 0.5 mm; F = 100 μm; G, I, K =
20 μm; H, J, L = 10 μm.Distribution: New Zealand, probably common throughout the range of
its host species.Other specimens examined. New Zealand, Mackenzie, Lake
Ohau, on Korthalsella clavata, Jan. 2009, A.W. Robertson, PDD 95153;
Mid Canterbury, Banks Peninsula, Price's Valley, on K. lindsayi, 2
Sep. 1995, J.E. Braggins, PDD 65042; Mid Canterbury, Castle Hill, on K.
clavata, 17 Jan. 2008, A. Sultan & A.W. Robertson, PDD 95150; South
Canterbury, Peel Forest, on K. lindsayi, 22 June 1995, B.P.J. Molloy,
PDD 35039; Taupo, vic. Motuoapa, on K. salicornioides, 3 Apr. 2008,
A. Sultan, PDD 95151; Wanganui, vic. Palmerston North, Coles Bush, living
internodes of K. lindsayi, 22 Nov. 2008, S. Amir, PDD 94923.Rosenscheldiella styracis A. Ascomata, comprising groups of
superficial pseudothecia amongst leaf hairs on underside of host leaf, detail
of leaf hair inset. B. Uninfected host leaf in vertical section showing leaf
hairs. C. Ascoma in vertical section, several pseudothecia held on extensive
basal stroma, superficial amongst leaf hairs. D. Intercellular fungal hyphae
within leaf immediately below ascoma. PDD 38182. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B, C =
50 μm; D = 10 μm.Notes: The only species of Rosenscheldiella previously
reported from a viscaceous mistletoe is R. phoradendri known from El
Salvador on Phoradendron robustissimum. Based on the published
description (Jenkins & Limber
1952), R. phoradendri has larger ascospores, 35–48
× 13–16 μm, than our new species.(Henn.) Theiss. & Syd., Ann.
Mycol. 13: 645. 1915. Fig.
7.
Fig. 7.
Rosenscheldiella styracis A. Ascomata, comprising groups of
superficial pseudothecia amongst leaf hairs on underside of host leaf, detail
of leaf hair inset. B. Uninfected host leaf in vertical section showing leaf
hairs. C. Ascoma in vertical section, several pseudothecia held on extensive
basal stroma, superficial amongst leaf hairs. D. Intercellular fungal hyphae
within leaf immediately below ascoma. PDD 38182. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B, C =
50 μm; D = 10 μm.
Ascomata develop on lower surface of leaf, comprising 10–30
globose, dark-walled pseudothecia in confluent groups up to 0.7 mm across.
Pseudothecia develop on extensive stromatic pads of globose cells
with thick, dark walls that form amongst thick-walled, multi-lobed hairs on
lower surface of leaves. Stromatic pads appear to arise from hyphae growing
through stomata, but this not clearly seen. Within leaf, fungal hyphae
confined to area immediately adjacent to ascomata. Hamathecium
lacking. Asci fissitunicate, cylindric, about 110 × 20 μm,
8-spored. Ascospores 32.5–36 × 7–7.5 μm,
cylindric, tapering slightly to rounded ends, 1 median septum, slightly
constricted at septum, hyaline.Specimen examined: Uruguay, Dept. Treinta y Tres, Tacuari,
on Styrax leprosus, Nov. 1933, W.G. Herter, Reliquiae Petrakianae
105, PDD 38182. Although not the type, this specimen is considered
authentic.
Authors: Pedro W Crous; Bernard Slippers; Michael J Wingfield; John Rheeder; Walter F O Marasas; Alan J L Philips; Artur Alves; Treena Burgess; Paul Barber; Johannes Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Michael J Wingfield; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Bernard Slippers; Brenda D Wingfield; Johannes Z Groenewald; Lorenzo Lombard; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: Ying Zhang; Pedro W Crous; Conrad L Schoch; Ali H Bahkali; Liang Dong Guo; Kevin D Hyde Journal: Fungal Divers Date: 2011-11-02 Impact factor: 20.372
Authors: S I R Videira; J Z Groenewald; C Nakashima; U Braun; R W Barreto; P J G M de Wit; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Pedro W Crous; Andrew M Minnis; Olinto L Pereira; Acelino C Alfenas; Rafael F Alfenas; Amy Y Rossman; Johannes Z Groenewald Journal: IMA Fungus Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 3.515
Authors: Vladimiro Guarnaccia; Thies Gehrmann; Geraldo J Silva-Junior; Paul H Fourie; Sajeet Haridas; Duong Vu; Joseph Spatafora; Francis M Martin; Vincent Robert; Igor V Grigoriev; Johannes Z Groenewald; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: S Wikee; L Lombard; C Nakashima; K Motohashi; E Chukeatirote; R Cheewangkoon; E H C McKenzie; K D Hyde; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: V Guarnaccia; J Z Groenewald; H Li; C Glienke; E Carstens; V Hattingh; P H Fourie; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 16.097