P W Crous1, U Braun, J Z Groenewald. 1. CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Mycosphaerella, one of the largest genera of ascomycetes, encompasses several thousand species and has anamorphs residing in more than 30 form genera. Although previous phylogenetic studies based on the ITS rDNA locus supported the monophyly of the genus, DNA sequence data derived from the LSU gene distinguish several clades and families in what has hitherto been considered to represent the Mycosphaerellaceae. Several important leaf spotting and extremotolerant species need to be disposed to the genus Teratosphaeria, for which a new family, the Teratosphaeriaceae, is introduced. Other distinct clades represent the Schizothyriaceae, Davidiellaceae, Capnodiaceae, and the Mycosphaerellaceae. Within the two major clades, namely Teratosphaeriaceae and Mycosphaerellaceae, most anamorph genera are polyphyletic, and new anamorph concepts need to be derived to cope with dual nomenclature within the Mycosphaerella complex.
Mycosphaerella, one of the largest genera of ascomycetes, encompasses several thousand species and has anamorphs residing in more than 30 form genera. Although previous phylogenetic studies based on the ITS rDNA locus supported the monophyly of the genus, DNA sequence data derived from the LSU gene distinguish several clades and families in what has hitherto been considered to represent the Mycosphaerellaceae. Several important leaf spotting and extremotolerant species need to be disposed to the genus Teratosphaeria, for which a new family, the Teratosphaeriaceae, is introduced. Other distinct clades represent the Schizothyriaceae, Davidiellaceae, Capnodiaceae, and the Mycosphaerellaceae. Within the two major clades, namely Teratosphaeriaceae and Mycosphaerellaceae, most anamorph genera are polyphyletic, and new anamorph concepts need to be derived to cope with dual nomenclature within the Mycosphaerella complex.
The genus Mycosphaerella Johanson as presently circumscribed
contains close to 3 000 species (Aptroot
2006), excluding its anamorphs, which represent thousands of
additional species (Crous et al.
2000,
2001,
2004a,
b,
2006a,
b,
2007b,
Crous & Braun 2003). Crous
(1998) predicted that
Mycosphaerella would eventually be split according to its anamorph
genera, and Crous et al.
(2000) recognised six
sections, as originally defined by Barr
(1972). This was followed by a
set of papers (Crous , Goodwin ), where it was concluded, based on ITS DNA sequence data,
that Mycosphaerella was monophyletic. A revision of the various
coelomycete and hyphomycete anamorph concepts led Crous & Braun
(2003) to propose a system
whereby the asexual morphs could be allocated to various form genera
affiliated with Mycosphaerella holomorphs.In a recent study that formed part of the US “Assembling the Fungal
Tree of Life” project, Schoch et al.
(2006) were able to show that
the Mycosphaerellaceae represents a family within
Capnodiales. Furthermore, some variation was also depicted within the
family, which supported similar findings in other recent papers employing LSU
sequence data, such as Hunter et al.
(2006), and Batzer et
al. (2007). To further
elucidate the phylogenetic variation observed within the
Mycosphaerellaceae in these studies, a subset of isolates was
selected for the present study, representing the various species recognised as
morphologically distinct from Mycosphaerella s. str.The genus Mycosphaerella has in recent years been linked to
approximately 30 anamorph genera (Crous
& Braun 2003, Crous ). Many of these anamorph genera resulted from a
reassessment of cercosporoid forms. Chupp
(1954) was of the opinion that
they all represented species of the genus Cercospora Fresen.,
although he clearly recognised differences in their morphology. In a series of
papers by Deighton, as well as others such as Sutton, Braun and Crous, the
genus Cercospora was delimited based on its type species,
Cercospora penicillata (Ces.) Fresen., while taxa formerly included
in the genus by Chupp (1954)
but differing in conidiophore arrangement, conidiogenesis, pigmentation,
conidial catenulation, septation, and scar/hilum structure were allocated to
other genera. Similar studies in which the type species were recollected and
subjected to DNA sequence analysis were undertaken to characterise
Mycosphaerella (Verkley ), and anamorph genera such as
Pseudocercospora Speg., Stigmina Sacc.,
Phaeoisariopsis Ferraris (Crous
), Ramulispora Miura
(Crous ),
Batcheloromyces Marasas, P.S. van Wyk & Knox-Dav.
(Taylor ),
Phaeophleospora Rangel and Dothistroma Hulbary
(Crous ,
2001,
Barnes ).To assess the phylogeny of the species selected for the present study, DNA
sequences were generated of the 28S rRNA (LSU) gene. In a further attempt to
address monophyletic groups within this complex, these data were integrated
with their morphological characteristics. To further resolve pleomorphism
among the species studied, isolates were examined on a range of cultural media
to induce possible synanamorphs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolates
Chosen isolates represent various species previously observed to be
morphologically distinct from Mycosphaerella s. str.
(Crous 1998, Crous et
al. 2004a,
b,
2006a,
b,
2007b). In a few cases,
specifically Teratosphaeria fibrillosa Syd. & P. Syd. and
Coccodinium bartschii A. Massal., fresh material had to be collected
from South Africa and Canada, respectively. Excised tissue pieces bearing
ascomata were soaked in water for approximately 2 h, after which they were
placed in the bottom of Petri dish lids, with the top half of the dish
containing 2 % malt extract agar (MEA)
(Gams ).
Ascospore germination patterns were examined after 24 h, and single-ascospore
and conidial cultures established as described by Crous
(1998). Colonies were
sub-cultured onto synthetic nutrient-poor agar (SNA), potato-dextrose agar
(PDA), oatmeal agar (OA), MEA (Gams ), and incubated at 25 °C under continuous
near-ultraviolet light to promote sporulation.
DNA phylogeny
Fungal colonies were established on agar plates, and genomic DNA was
isolated following the CTAB-based protocol described in Gams et al.
(2007). The primers V9G
(de Hoog & Gerrits van den Ende
1998) and LR5 (Vilgalys &
Hester 1990) were used to amplify part of the nuclear rDNA operon
spanning the 3' end of the 18S rRNA gene (SSU), the first internal transcribed
spacer (ITS1), the 5.8S rRNA gene, the second ITS region (ITS2) and the 5' end
of the 28S rRNA gene (LSU). The primers ITS4
(White ),
LR0R (Rehner & Samuels
1994), LR3R
(www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm),
and LR16 (Moncalvo ), were used as internal sequence primers to ensure good
quality sequences over the entire length of the amplicon. The ITS1, ITS2 and
5.8S rRNA gene (ITS) were only sequenced for isolates of which these data were
not available. The ITS data were not included in the analyses but deposited in
GenBank where applicable. The PCR conditions, sequence alignment and
subsequent phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, distance and Bayesian
analyses followed the methods of Crous et al.
(2006c). Gaps longer than 10
bases were coded as single events for the phylogenetic analyses; the remaining
gaps were treated as new character states. Sequence data were deposited in
GenBank (Table 1) and
alignments in TreeBASE
(www.treebase.org).
Table 1.
Isolates for which new sequences were generated.
Anamorph
Teleomorph
Accession
number1
Host
Country
Collector
GenBank Accession number
Batcheloromyces eucalypti
CBS 313.76; CPC
3632
Eucalyptus tessellaris
Australia
J.L. Alcorn
EU019245
Batcheloromyces leucadendri
CBS 110892; CPC
1837
Leucadendron sp.
South Africa
L. Swart
EU019246
Batcheloromyces proteae
CBS 110696; CPC
1518
Protea cynaroides
South Africa
L. Viljoen
EU019247
Capnobotryella renispora
CBS
214.90*;
CBS 176.88; IAM
13014; JCM 6932
Capnobotrys neessii
Japan
J. Sugiyama
EU019248
Catenulostroma abietis
CBS 290.90
Man, skin lesion
Netherlands
R.G.F. Wintermans
EU019249
Catenulostroma castellanii
CBS
105.75*;
ATCC 24788
Man, tinea nigra
Venezuela
—
EU019250
Catenulostroma chromoblastomycosum
CBS 597.97
Man, chromoblastomycosis
Zaire
V. de Brouwere
EU019251
Catenulostroma elginense
CBS 111030; CPC
1958
Protea grandiceps
South Africa
J.E. Taylor
EU019252
Catenulostroma germanicum
CBS 539.88
Stone
Germany
—
EU019253
Catenulostroma macowanii
CBS 110756; CPC
1872
Protea nitida
South Africa
J.E. Taylor
EU019254
Catenulostroma microsporum
Teratosphaeria microspora
CBS 110890; CPC
1832
Protea cynaroides
South Africa
L. Swart
EU019255
Catenulostroma sp.
Teratosphaeria pseudosuberosa
CBS 118911; CPC
12085
Eucalyptus sp.
Uruguay
M.J. Wingfield
EU019256
Cercosporella centaureicola
CBS 120253
Centaurea solstitiales
Greece
D. Berner
EU019257
Cibiessia dimorphospora
CBS 120034; CPC
12636
Eucalyptus nitens
Australia
—
EU019258
Cibiessia minutispora
CPC 13071*
Eucalyptus henryii
Australia
A.J. Carnegie
EU019259
Cibiessia nontingens
Teratosphaeria sp.
CBS
120725*;
CPC 13217
Eucalyptus tereticornis
Australia
B. Summerell
EU019260
Cladosporium bruhnei
Davidiella allicina
CBS 115683; ATCC
66670; CPC 5101
CCA-treated Douglas-fire pole
U.S.A., New York
C.J. Wang
EU019261
Cladosporium cladosporioides
CBS 109.21; ATCC
11277; ATCC 200940; IFO 6368; IMI 049625
Sooty mould on Hedera helix
U.K.
—
EU019262
Cladosporium sphaerospermum
CBS 188.54; ATCC
11290; IMI 049638
—
—
—
EU019263
Cladosporium uredinicola
ATCC 46649
Hyperparasite on Cronartium fusiforme f. sp. quercum
U.S.A., Alabama
—
EU019264
Coccodinium bartschii
CBS 121708; CPC
13861-13863
Sooty mould on unidentified tree
Canada
K.A. Seifert
EU019265
Dissoconium aciculare
CBS
342.82*;
CPC 1534
Erysiphe, on Medicago lupulina
Germany
T. Hijwegen
EU019266
Dissoconium commune
“Mycosphaerella” communis
CBS
114238*;
CPC 10440
Eucalyptus globulus
Spain
J.P.M. Vazquez
EU019267
Dissoconium dekkeri
“Mycosphaerella” lateralis
CBS
567.89*;
CPC 1535
Juniperus chinensis
Netherlands
T. Hijwegen
EU019268
Fumagospora capnodioides
Capnodium salicinum
CBS 131.34
Sooty mould on Bursaria spinosa
Indonesia
—
EU019269
Hortaea werneckii
CBS
107.67*
Man, tinea nigra
Portugal
—
EU019270
Nothostrasseria dendritica
Teratosphaeria dendritica
CPC 12820
Eucalyptus nitens
Australia
A.J. Carnegie
EU019271
“Passalora” zambiae
CBS
112970*;
CPC 1228
Eucalyptus globulus
Zambia
T. Coutinho
EU019272
CBS
112971*;
CMW 14782; CPC 1227
Eucalyptus globulus
Zambia
T. Coutinho
EU019273
Penidiella columbiana
CBS 486.80
Paepalanthus columbianus
Colombia
W. Gams
EU019274
Penidiella nectandrae
CBS
734.87*;
ATCC 200932; INIFAT 87/45
Nectandra coriacea
Cuba
R.F. Castañeda & G. Arnold
EU019275
Penidiella rigidophora
CBS
314.95*
Leaf litter of Smilax sp.
Cuba
R.F. Castañeda
EU019276
Penidiella strumelloidea
CBS
114484*;
VKM F-2534
Carex leaf, from stagnant water
Russia
S. Ozerskaya
EU019277
Penidiella venezuelensis
CBS
106.75*
Man, tinea nigra
Venezuela
D. Borelli
EU019278
Phaeotheca triangularis
CBS
471.90*
Wet surface of humidifier of airconditioning
Belgium
H. Beguin
EU019279
Phaeothecoidea eucalypti
CPC 13010
Corymbia henryii
Australia
B. Summerell
EU019280
CPC 12918*
Eucalyptus botryoides
Australia
B. Summerell
EU019281
Pleurophoma sp.
Teratosphaeria fibrillosa
CPC 1876
Protea nitida
South Africa
J.E. Taylor
EU019282
Pseudotaeniolina globosa
CBS
109889*
Rock
Italy
C. Urzi
EU019283
Ramularia pratensis var. pratensis
CPC 11294
Rumex crispus
Korea
H.D. Shin
EU019284
Ramularia sp.
CBS 324.87
On Mycosphaerella sp., leaf spot on Brassica sp.
Netherlands
—
EU019285
Readeriella brunneotingens
CPC 13303
Eucalyptus tereticornis
Australia
P.W. Crous
EU019286
Readeriella destructans
CBS
111369*;
CPC 1366
Eucalyptus grandis
Indonesia
M.J. Wingfield
EU019287
Readeriella epicoccoides
Teratosphaeria suttonii
CPC 12352
Eucalyptus sp.
U.S.A.,Hawaii
W. Gams
EU019288
Readeriella eucalypti
CPC 11186
Eucalyptus globulus
Spain
M.J. Wingfield
EU019289
Readeriella gauchensis
CBS
120303*;
CMW 17331
Eucalyptus grandis
Uruguay
M.J. Wingfield
EU019290
Readeriella mirabilis
CBS 116293; CPC
10506
Eucalyptus fastigata
New Zealand
W. Gams
EU019291
Readeriella molleriana
Teratosphaeria molleriana
CBS
111164*;
CMW 4940; CPC 1214
Eucalyptus globulus
Portugal
M.J. Wingfield
EU019292
Readeriella ovata complex
CPC 18
Eucalyptus cladocalyx
South Africa
P.W. Crous
EU019293
CBS 111149; CPC 23
Eucalyptus cladocalyx
South Africa
P.W. Crous
EU019294
Readeriella stellenboschiana
CBS 116428; CPC
10886
Eucalyptus sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
EU019295
Readeriella zuluensis
CBS
120301*;
CMW 17321
Eucalyptus grandis
South Africa
M.J. Wingfield
EU019296
Septoria tritici
Mycosphaerella graminicola
CBS 100335; IPO
69001.61
Triticum aestivum
—
G.H.J. Kema
EU019297
CBS 110744; CPC 658
Triticum sp.
South Africa
P.W. Crous
EU019298
Trimmatostroma betulinum
CBS 282.74
Betula verrucosa
Netherlands
W.M. Loerakker
EU019299
Trimmatostroma salicis
CPC 13571
Salix alba
Germany
U. Braun
EU019300
Teratosphaeria bellula
CBS 111700; CPC
1821
Protea eximia
South Africa
J.E. Taylor
EU019301
Teratosphaeria mexicana
CPC 12349
Eucalyptus sp.
U.S.A.,Hawaii
W. Gams
EU019302
Teratosphaeria nubilosa
CBS 114419; CPC
10497
Eucalyptus globulus
New Zealand
—
EU019303
CBS
116005*;
CMW 3282; CPC 937
Eucalyptus globulus
Australia
A. Carnegie
EU019304
Teratosphaeria ohnowa
CBS
112896*;
CMW 4937; CPC 1004
Eucalyptus grandis
South Africa
M.J. Wingfield
EU019305
Teratosphaeria secundaria
CBS 115608; CPC 504
Eucalyptus grandis
Brazil
A.C. Alfenas
EU019306
Teratosphaeria sp.
CBS 208.94; CPC 727
Eucalyptus grandis
Indonesia
A.C. Alfenas
EU019307
ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, U.S.A.; CBS:
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture
collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; CMW: Culture collection of Mike
Wingfield, housed at FABI, Pretoria, South Africa; IAM: Institute of Applied
Microbiology, University of Tokyo, Institute of molecular and cellular
bioscience, Tokyo, Japan; IFO: Institute For Fermentation, Osaka, Japan; IMI:
International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane,
U.K.; INIFAT: Alexander Humboldt Institute for Basic Research in Tropical
Agriculture, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba; JCM: Japan Collection Of
Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Center, Japan; VKM: All-Russian Collection
of Microorganisms, Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms,
Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia.
Ex-type cultures.
Isolates for which new sequences were generated.ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, U.S.A.; CBS:
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture
collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; CMW: Culture collection of Mike
Wingfield, housed at FABI, Pretoria, South Africa; IAM: Institute of Applied
Microbiology, University of Tokyo, Institute of molecular and cellular
bioscience, Tokyo, Japan; IFO: Institute For Fermentation, Osaka, Japan; IMI:
International Mycological Institute, CABI-Bioscience, Egham, Bakeham Lane,
U.K.; INIFAT: Alexander Humboldt Institute for Basic Research in Tropical
Agriculture, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba; JCM: Japan Collection Of
Microorganisms, RIKEN BioResource Center, Japan; VKM: All-Russian Collection
of Microorganisms, Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms,
Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia.Ex-type cultures.
Taxonomy
Wherever possible, 30 measurements (× 1 000 magnification) were made
of structures mounted in lactic acid, with the extremes of spore measurements
given in parentheses. Ascospores were frequently also mounted in water to
observe mucoid appendages and sheaths. Colony colours (surface and reverse)
were assessed after 1-2 mo on MEA at 25 °C in the dark, using the colour
charts of Rayner (1970). All
cultures obtained in this study are maintained in the culture collection of
the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS) in Utrecht, the Netherlands
(Table 1). Nomenclatural
novelties and descriptions were deposited in MycoBank
(www.MycoBank.org).
RESULTS
Amplification products of approximately 1 700 bases were obtained for the
isolates listed in Table 1. The
LSU region of the sequences was used to obtain additional sequences from
GenBank which were added to the alignment. The manually adjusted alignment
contained 97 sequences (including the two outgroup sequences) and 844
characters including alignment gaps. Of the 844 characters used in the
phylogenetic analysis, 308 were parsimony-informative, 105 were variable and
parsimony-uninformative, and 431 were constant.The parsimony analysis of the LSU region yielded 1 135 equally most
parsimonious trees (TL = 1 502 steps; CI = 0.446; RI = 0.787; RC = 0.351), one
of which is shown in Fig. 1.
Three orders are represented by the ingroup isolates, namely
Chaetothyriales (100 % bootstrap support), Helotiales (100 %
bootstrap support) and Capnodiales (100 % bootstrap support). These
are discussed in detail in the Taxonomy and Discussion sections. A new
collection of Coccodinium bartschii A. Massal clusters (100 %
bootstrap support) with members of the Herpotrichiellaceae
(Chaetothyriales), whereas the type species of the genus
Trimmatostroma Corda, namely T. salicis Corda, as well as
T. betulinum (Corda) S. Hughes, are allied (99 % bootstrap support)
with the Dermateaceae (Helotiales). The Capnodiales
encompasses members of the Capnodiaceae, Trichosphaeriaceae,
Davidiellaceae, Schizothyriaceae and taxa traditionally placed in the
Mycosphaerellaceae, which is divided here into the
Teratosphaeriaceae, (65 % bootstrap support), and the
Mycosphaerellaceae (76 % bootstrap support), which contains several
subclades. Also included in the Capnodiales are Devriesia
staurophora (W.B. Kendr.) Seifert & N.L. Nick., Staninwardia
suttonii Crous & Summerell and Capnobotryella renispora
Sugiy. as sister taxa to Teratosphaeriaceae s. str. Neighbour-joining
analysis using three substitution models on the sequence data yielded trees
supporting the same topologies, but differed from the parsimony tree presented
with regard to the order of the families and orders at the deeper nodes, e.g.,
the Helotiales and Chaetothyriales are swapped around, as
are the Capnodiaceae and the
Trichosphaeriaceae/Davidiellaceae (data not shown). Using
neighbour-joining analyses, the Mycosphaerellaceae s. str. clade
obtained 71 %, 70 % and 70 % bootstrap support respectively with the
uncorrected “p”, Kimura 2-parameter and HKY85 substitution models
wherease the Teratosphaeriaceae clade obtained 74 %, 79 % and 78 %
bootstrap support respectively with the same models. The
Schizothyriaceae clade appeared basal in the Capnodiales,
irrespective of which substitution model was used.
Fig. 1.
One of 1 135 equally most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic
search with 100 random taxon additions of the LSU sequence alignment using
PAUP v. 4.0b 10. The scale bar shows 10 changes, and bootstrap support values
from 1000 replicates are shown at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate the
strict consensus branches and ex-type sequences are printed in bold face. The
tree was rooted to two sequences obtained from GenBank (Athelia
epiphylla AY586633 and Paullicorticium ansatum AY586693).
Bayesian analysis was conducted on the same aligned LSU dataset using a
general time-reversible (GTR) substitution model with inverse gamma rates and
dirichlet base frequencies. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis of 4
chains started from a random tree topology and lasted 23 881 500 generations.
Trees were saved each 100 generations, resulting in 238 815 saved trees.
Burn-in was set at 22 000 000 generations after which the likelihood values
were stationary, leaving 18 815 trees from which the consensus tree
(Fig. 2) and posterior
probabilities (PP's) were calculated. The average standard deviation of split
frequencies was 0.011508 at the end of the run. The same overall topology as
that observed using parsimony was obtained, with the exception of the
inclusion of Staninwardia suttonii in the Mycosphaerellaceae
(PP value of 0.74) and not in the Teratosphaeriaceae. The
Mycosphaerellaceae s. str. clade, as well as the
Teratosphaeriaceae clade, obtained a PP value of 1.00.
Fig. 2.
Consensus phylogram (50 % majority rule) of 18 815 trees resulting from a
Bayesian analysis of the LSU sequence alignment using
MrBayes v. 3.1.2. Bayesian posterior probabilities are
indicated at the nodes. Ex-type sequences are printed in bold face. The tree
was rooted to two sequences obtained from GenBank (Athelia epiphylla
AY586633 and Paullicorticium ansatum AY586693).
Based on the dataset generated in this study, several well-supported genera
could be distinguished in the Mycosphaerella complex (Figs
1-2),
for which we have identified morphological characters. These genera, and a
selection of their species, are treated below.
Key to Mycosphaerella, and Mycosphaerella-like
genera treated
1. Ascomata thyrothecial; anamorph
Zygosporium................................................................................................................
.1. Ascomata
pseudothecial...........................................................................................................................................................................
22. Ascospores with irregular, angular lumens typical of
Davidiella; anamorph Cladosporium s.
str...............................................2. Ascospores guttulate or not, lacking angular lumens; anamorph other than
Cladosporium.....................................................................
33. Ascomata frequently linked by superficial stroma; hamathecial tissue,
ascospore sheath, multi-layered endotunica, prominent periphysoids, and
ascospores turning brown in asci frequently
observed........................................................................3. Ascomata not linked by superficial stroma; hamathecial tissue, ascospore
sheath, multi-layered endotunica, prominent periphysoids, ascospores turning
brown in asci not
observed........................................................................................................................................
44. Conidiophores solitary, pale brown, giving rise to primary and
secondary, actively discharged conidia; anamorph
Dissoconium...................................................................................................................................................................
teleomorph Mycosphaerella-like4. Conidiomata variable from solitary conidiophores to sporodochia,
fascicles to pycnidia, but conidia not actively
discharged.....................................................................................................................................................................................................
s. str.
Treatment of phylogenetic clades
Davidiellaceae clade
Crous & U. Braun, Mycol. Progr. 2: 8.
2003.One of 1 135 equally most parsimonious trees obtained from a heuristic
search with 100 random taxon additions of the LSU sequence alignment using
PAUP v. 4.0b 10. The scale bar shows 10 changes, and bootstrap support values
from 1000 replicates are shown at the nodes. Thickened lines indicate the
strict consensus branches and ex-type sequences are printed in bold face. The
tree was rooted to two sequences obtained from GenBank (Athelia
epiphylla AY586633 and Paullicorticium ansatum AY586693).Consensus phylogram (50 % majority rule) of 18 815 trees resulting from a
Bayesian analysis of the LSU sequence alignment using
MrBayes v. 3.1.2. Bayesian posterior probabilities are
indicated at the nodes. Ex-type sequences are printed in bold face. The tree
was rooted to two sequences obtained from GenBank (Athelia epiphylla
AY586633 and Paullicorticium ansatum AY586693).Type species: Davidiella tassiana (De Not.) Crous &
U. Braun, Mycol. Progr. 2: 8. 2003.Basionym: Sphaerella tassiana De Not., Sferiacei Italici
1: 87. 1863.Description: Schubert et al.
(2007 - this volume).Anamorph: Cladosporium Link, Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin
Mag. Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 7: 37. 1816.Type species: Cladosporium herbarum (Pers.: Fr.) Link,
Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin Mag. Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 7: 37.
1816.Basionym: Dematium herbarum Pers., Ann. Bot. (Usteri), 11
Stück: 32. 1794: Fr., Syst. Mycol. 3: 370. 1832.Description: Schubert et al.
(2007 - this volume).Notes: The genus Davidiella (Davidiellaceae) was
recently introduced for teleomorphs of Cladosporium s. str.
(Braun ).
The genus Cladosporium is well-established, and contains around 772
names (Dugan ), while Davidiella presently has 33 names
(www.MycoBank.org),
of which only around five have acknowledged Cladosporium states.
Teratosphaeriaceae clade
Syd. & P. Syd., Ann. Mycol. 10: 39.
1912.Type species: Teratosphaeria fibrillosa Syd. & P.
Syd., Ann. Mycol. 10: 40. 1912. Fig.
3.
Fig. 3.
Teratosphaeria fibrillosa (epitype material). A. Leaf spots. B.
Subepidermal ascomata linked by means of stromatic tissue. C. Paraphyses among
asci. D. Periphysoids. E. Ascospores becoming brown in asci. F-G.
Multi-layered endotunica. H-K. Ascospores, becoming brown and verruculose.
L-M. Germinating ascospores. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Description: Crous et al.
(2004a; figs 182-185).Notes: Although similar in morphology, the genus
Teratosphaeria was separated from Mycosphaerella based on
its ascomatal arrangement, and periphysate ostioles
(Müller & Oehrens
1982). It was later synonymised under Mycosphaerella by
Taylor et al. (2003),
who showed that the type species clustered within Mycosphaerella
based on ITS DNA sequence data. The LSU sequence data generated in the present
study, has clearly shown that Mycosphaerella is polyphyletic, thus
contradicting earlier reports of monophyly by Crous et al.
(2000) and Goodwin et
al. (2001), which were
based on ITS data.A re-examination of T. fibrillosa, the type species of
Teratosphaeria, revealed several morphological features that
characterise the majority of the taxa clustering in the clade, though several
characters have been lost in some of the small-spored species. These
characters are discussed below:Teratosphaeria fibrillosa has a superficial stroma linking
ascomata together, almost appearing like a spider's web on the leaf surface.
Although this feature is not seen in other taxa in this clade, some species,
such as M. suberosa Crous, F.A. Ferreira, Alfenas & M.J. Wingf.
and M. pseudosuberosa Crous & M.J. Wingf. have a superficial
stroma, into which the ascomata are inbedded
(Crous 1998,
Crous ).Ascospores of Teratosphaeria become brown and verruculose while
still in their asci. This feature is commonly observed in species such as
M. jonkershoekensis P.S. van Wyk, Marasas & Knox-Dav., M.
alistairii Crous, M. mexicana Crous, M. maxii Crous and
M. excentricum Crous & Carnegie
(Crous 1998, Crous &
Groenewald 2006a,
b,
Crous ).A few ascomata of T. fibrillosa were found to have some
pseudoparaphysoidal remnants (cells to distinguish pseudoparaphyses), though
they mostly disappear with age. This feature is rather uncommon, though
pseudoparaphyses were observed in ascomata of M. eucalypti (Wakef.)
Hansf.Ascospores of Teratosphaeria were found to be covered in a mucous
sheath, which is commonly observed in other taxa in this clade, such as M.
bellula Crous & M.J. Wingf., M. pseudocryptica Crous, M.
suberosa, M. pseudosuberosa, M. associata Crous & Carnegie, M.
dendritica Crous & Summerell and M. fimbriata Crous &
Summerell (Crous et al.
2004b,
2006b,
2007b). Re-examination of
fresh collections also revealed ascospores of M. cryptica (Cooke)
Hansf. and M. nubilosa (Cooke) Hansf. to have a weakly definable
sheath. Germinating ascospores of species in this clade all exhibit a
prominent mucoid sheath.Asci of T. fibrillosa were observed to have a multi-layered
endotunica, which, although not common, can be seen in species such as M.
excentrica, M. maxii, M. alistairii, M. pseudosuberosa, M. fimbriata
(Crous ,
2007b, Crous & Groenewald
2006a,
b), and also M.
nubilosa.Finally, ascomata of T. fibrillosa and T.
proteae-arboreae P.S. van Wyk, Marasas & Knox-Dav. have
well-developed ostiolar periphyses, which are also present in species such as
M. suberosa, M. pseudosuberosa, M. maxii and T. microspora
Joanne E. Taylor & Crous (Crous
1998, Crous et al.
2004a,
b,
2006b). Morphologically thus,
the Teratosphaeria clade is distinguishable from Mycosphaerella
s. str., though these differences are less pronounced in some of the
smaller-spored species. Based on these distinct morphological features, as
well as its phylogenetic position within the Capnodiales, a new
family is herewith proposed to accommodate species of
Teratosphaeria:Crous & U. Braun, fam. nov.
MycoBank
MB504464.Ascomata pseudotheciales, superficiales vel immersa, saepe in stromate ex
cellulis brunneis pseudoparenchymatibus disposita, globulares, uniloculares,
papillata, apice ostiolato, periphysata, saepe cum periphysoidibus; tunica
multistratosa, ex cellulis brunneis angularibus composita, strato interiore ex
cellulis applanatis hyalinis; saepe cum pseudoparaphysibus subcylindricis,
ramosis, septatis, anastomosibus. Asci fasciculati, octospori, bitunicati,
saepe cum endotunica multistratosa. Ascosporae ellipsoideae-fusiformes vel
obovoideae, 1-septatae, hyalinae, deinde pallide brunneae et verruculosae,
saepe mucosae.Ascomata pseudothecial, superficial to immersed, frequently
situated in a stroma of brown pseudoparenchymatal cells, globose, unilocular,
papillate, ostiolate, canal periphysate, with periphysoids frequently present;
wall consisting of several layers of brown textura angularis; inner
layer of flattened, hyaline cells. Pseudoparaphyses frequently
present, subcylindrical, branched, septate, anastomosing. Asci
fasciculate, 8-spored, bitunicate, frequently with multi-layered endotunica.
Ascospores ellipsoid-fusoid to obovoid, 1-septate, hyaline, but
becoming pale brown and verruculose, frequently covered in mucoid sheath.Typus: Teratosphaeria Syd. & P. Syd., Ann. Mycol. 10:
39. 1912.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504466.Basionym: Mycosphaerella africana Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Mycologia 88: 450. 1996.Teratosphaeria fibrillosa (epitype material). A. Leaf spots. B.
Subepidermal ascomata linked by means of stromatic tissue. C. Paraphyses among
asci. D. Periphysoids. E. Ascospores becoming brown in asci. F-G.
Multi-layered endotunica. H-K. Ascospores, becoming brown and verruculose.
L-M. Germinating ascospores. Scale bars = 10 μm.(Crous & Carnegie) Crous &
U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504467.Basionym: Mycosphaerella associata Crous & Carnegie,
Fungal Diversity 26: 159. 2007.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504468.Basionym: Mycosphaerella alistairii Crous, in Crous &
Groenewald, Fungal Planet, No. 4. 2006.Anamorph: Batcheloromyces sp.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504469.Basionym: Mycosphaerella bellula Crous & M.J. Wingf.,
Mycotaxon 46: 20. 1993.(Cooke) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504470.Basionym: Sphaerella cryptica Cooke, Grevillea 20: 5.
1891.≡ Mycosphaerella cryptica (Cooke) Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc.
New South Wales 81: 35. 1956.Anamorph: (Ganap. &
Corbin) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504471.Basionym: Colletogloeum nubilosum Ganap. & Corbin,
Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 72: 237. 1979.≡ Colletogloeopsis nubilosum (Ganap. & Corbin) Crous
& M.J. Wingf., Canad. J. Bot. 75: 668. 1997.(Crous & Summerell) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504472.Basionym: Mycosphaerella dendritica Crous &
Summerell, Fungal Diversity 26: 161. 2007.Anamorph: (Hansf.) Nag
Raj, Canad. J. Bot. 61: 25. 1983.Basionym: Spilomyces dendriticus Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. New
South Wales 81: 32. 1956.(Crous & Carnegie) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504473.Basionym: Mycosphaerella excentrica Crous & Carnegie,
Fungal Diversity 26: 164. 2007.Anamorph: (B. Sutton
& Ganap.) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504475.Basionym: Trimmatostroma excentricum B. Sutton &
Ganap., New Zealand J. Bot. 16: 529. 1978.Syd. & P. Syd., Ann. Mycol.
10: 40. 1912.≡ Mycosphaerella fibrillosa (Syd. & P. Syd.) Joanne E.
Taylor & Crous, Mycol. Res. 107: 657. 2003.Specimens examined: South Africa, Western Cape Province,
Bains Kloof near Wellington, on living leaves of Protea grandiflora,
26 Feb. 1911, E.M. Doidge, holotype PREM; Stellenbosch, Jonkershoek
valley, S33° 59' 44.7”, E18° 58' 50.6”, 1 Apr. 2007, on
leaves of Protea sp., P.W. Crous & L. Mostert, epitype
designated here CBS
H-19913, culture ex-epitype
CBS 121707 = CPC
13960.(Crous & Summerell) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504476.Basionym: Mycosphaerella fimbriata Crous & Summerell,
Fungal Diversity 26: 166. 2007.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504477.Basionym: Mycosphaerella flexuosa Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Mycol. Mem. 21: 58. 1998.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504478.Basionym: Mycosphaerella gamsii Crous, Stud. Mycol. 55:
113. 2006.(P.S. van Wyk, Marasas
& Knox-Dav.) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504479.Basionym: Mycosphaerella jonkershoekensis P.S. van Wyk,
Marasas & Knox-Dav., J. S. African Bot. 41: 234. 1975.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun, comb.
nov. MycoBank
MB504480.Basionym: Mycosphaerella maxii Crous, in Crous &
Groenewald, Fungal Planet No. 6. 2006.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504481.Basionym: Mycosphaerella mexicana Crous, Mycol. Mem. 21:
81. 1998.Joanne E. Taylor & Crous,
Mycol. Res. 104: 631. 2000.≡ Mycosphaerella microspora (Joanne E. Taylor & Crous)
Joanne E. Taylor & Crous, Mycol. Res. 107: 657. 2003.Anamorph: (Joanne E.
Taylor & Crous) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504482.Basionym: Trimmatostroma microsporum Joanne E. Taylor
& Crous, Mycol. Res. 104: 631. 2000.(Thüm.) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504483.Basionym: Sphaerella molleriana Thüm., Revista Inst.
Sci. Lit. Coimbra 28: 31. 1881.≡ Mycosphaerella molleriana (Thüm) Lindau, Nat.
Pfanzenfam. 1: 424. 1897.= Mycosphaerella vespa Carnegie & Keane, Mycol. Res. 102:
1275. 1998.= Mycosphaerella ambiphylla A. Maxwell, Mycol. Res. 107: 354.
2003.Anamorph: (Crous & M.J.
Wingf.) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504484.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis molleriana Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Canad. J. Bot. 75: 670. 1997.(Cooke) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504485.Basionym: Sphaerella nubilosa Cooke, Grevillea 19: 61.
1892.≡ Mycosphaerella nubilosa (Cooke) Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc.
New South Wales 81: 36. 1965.= Mycosphaerella juvenis Crous & M.J. Wingf., Mycologia 88:
453. 1996.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous &
U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504486.Basionym: Mycosphaerella ohnowa Crous & M.J. Wingf.,
Stud. Mycol. 50: 206. 2004.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504487.Basionym: Mycosphaerella parkiiaffinis Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Fungal Diversity 26:168. 2007.(R.F. Park & Keane) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504488.Basionym: Mycosphaerella parva R.F. Park & Keane,
Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 79: 99. 1982.= Mycosphaerella grandis Carnegie & Keane, Mycol. Res. 98:
414. 1994.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504489.Basionym: Mycosphaerella perpendicularis Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Stud. Mycol. 55: 113. 2006.(Crous & Mansilla) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504490.Basionym: Mycosphaerella pluritubularis Crous &
Mansilla, Stud. Mycol. 55: 114. 2006.(Crous & T.A. Cout.) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504491.Basionym: Mycosphaerella pseudafricana Crous & T.A.
Cout., Stud. Mycol. 55: 115. 2006.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504492.Basionym: Mycosphaerella pseudocryptica Crous, Stud.
Mycol. 55: 116. 2006.Anamorph: sp.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504493.Basionym: Mycosphaerella pseudosuberosa Crous & M.J.
Wingf., Stud. Mycol. 55: 118. 2006.Anamorph: sp.(Crous & T.A. Cout.)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504494.Basionym: Mycosphaerella quasicercospora Crous & T.A.
Cout., Stud. Mycol. 55: 119. 2006.(Crous & Mansilla)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504495.Basionym: Mycosphaerella readeriellophora Crous &
Mansilla, Stud. Mycol. 50: 207. 2004.Anamorph: Crous &
Mansilla, Stud. Mycol. 50: 207. 2004. Fig.
18.
Fig. 18.
A-E. Readeriella mirabilis. A. Conidium with conidial cirrus. B.
Conidiogenous cells with percurrent proliferation. C. Macroconidia. D.
Slightly pigmented, verruculose conidiogenous cell. E. Macro- and
microconidia. F-I. Readeriella readeriellophora (type material). F.
Colony on OA. G. Central stromatal tissue giving rise to conidiophores. H.
Conidiogenous cells. I. Conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
(Crous & Alfenas) Crous &
U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504496.Basionym: Mycosphaerella secundaria Crous & Alfenas,
Stud. Mycol. 55: 122. 2006.(Crous & Alfenas) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504497.Basionym: Mycosphaerella stramenticola Crous &
Alfenas, Stud. Mycol. 55: 123. 2006.(Crous, F.A. Ferreira, Alfenas
& M.J. Wingf.) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504498.Basionym: Mycosphaerella suberosa Crous, F.A. Ferreira,
Alfenas & M.J. Wingf., Mycologia 85: 707. 1993.(Crous & M.J. Wingf.) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504499.Basionym: Mycosphaerella suttonii Crous & M.J. Wingf.
(suttoniae), Canad. J. Bot. 75: 783. 1997.Anamorph: (Cooke &
Massee) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504500.Basionym: Cercospora epicoccoides Cooke & Massee apud
Cooke, Grevillea 19: 91. 1891.≡ Phaeophleospora epicoccoides (Cooke & Massee) Crous,
F.A. Ferreira & B. Sutton, S. African J. Bot. 63: 113. 1997.≡ Kirramyces epicoccoides (Cooke & Massee) J. Walker, B.
Sutton & Pascoe, Mycol. Res. 96: 919. 1992.= Hendersonia grandispora McAlp., Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales
28: 99. 1903.= Phaeoseptoria eucalypti Hansf., Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales
82: 225. 1957.= Phaeoseptoria luzonensis T. Kobayashi, Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan
19: 377. 1978.Synanamorph: sp.(Crous & Bills) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504501.Basionym: Mycosphaerella toledana Crous & Bills,
Stud. Mycol. 50: 208. 2004.Anamorph: (Crous & Bills)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504502.Basionym: Phaeophleospora toledana Crous & Bills,
Stud. Mycol. 50: 208. 2004.
Key to treated anamorph genera of Teratosphaeria
(Teratosphaeriaceae)
1. Hyphae submerged to superficial, disarticulating into
arthroconidia.........................................................................................................
21. Hyphae not disarticulating into
arthroconidia............................................................................................................................................
32. Mature, brown hyphae disarticulating into thick-walled, spherical,
smooth to verruculose 0(-2) transversely septate, brown
conidia...........................................................................................................................
(= Friedmanniomyces)2. Hyphae superficial, brown to green-brown, smooth, disarticulating to
form pale brown, cylindrical, 0-3-septate conidia with subtruncate ends,
frequently with a Readeriella
synanamorph......................................................................................................................3. Hyphal ends forming endoconidia; hyphae pale to medium brown,
verruculose, end cells dividing into several brown, verruculose, thick-walled,
ellipsoid to obovoid
endoconidia.................................................................................................................3. Endoconidia
absent....................................................................................................................................................................................
44. Conidiogenous cells integrated in hyphae; well-developed conidiomata or
long, solitary, macronematous, terminally penicillate conidiophores
absent................................................................................................................................................................................
54. Conidiomata well-developed or with long, solitary, terminally
penicillate
conidiophores...........................................................................
75. Conidia in chains, holoblastic, pseudocladosporium-like in morphology,
but scars and hila not excessively thickened, nor refractive, producing
chlamydospores in culture; species are mostly heat
resistant...................................................................................5. Conidia solitary on indistict to well defined phialides on
hyphae...............................................................................................................
66. Conidiogenous cells integrated in the distal ends of hyphae; conidia
thick-walled, brown, smooth,
1-septate.........................................................................................................................................................................6. Conidiophores short and frequently reduced to conidiogenous cells that
proliferate percurrently via wide necks, giving rise to hyaline,
0(-2)-septate, broadly ellipsoidal
conidia................................................................................................................................................7. Conidia brown, with hyaline basal appendages; conidiomata pycnidial,
conidiogenous cells phialidic, but also percurrent,
subhyaline.......................................................................................................................................................................7. Conidia brown, but basal appendages lacking, amero- to
scolecospores................................................................................................
88. Conidiomata pycnidial to
acervular...........................................................................................................................................................
98. Conidiomata not enclosed by host tissue, fasciculate to sporodochial or
solitary,
hyphomycetous........................................................ 109. Conidia solitary, dry, without mucilaginous
sheath...................................................................................................................9. Conidia catenulate, with persistant mucilaginous
sheath.....................................................................................................10. Conidiophores usually solitary, rarely densely fasciculate to
synnematous (in vivo), penicillate, with a branched, apical
conidiogenous apparatus giving rise to ramoconidia and branched chains of
secondary conidia; scars not to slightly thickened and
darkened-refractive....................................................................................................................................................................................................10. Conidiophores not penicillate, without a branched conidiogenous
apparatus, in vivo fasciculate to
sporodochial................................. 1111. Biotrophic; fruiting composed of sporodochia and radiating layers of
hyphae arising from the stromata, conidiophores arising from superficial
sporodochia and radiating hyphae, conidiogenous cells unilocal, with
conspicuous annellations, conidia solitary or in fragile disarticulating
chains, aseptate or transversely 1-3-septate, usually with distinct frills,
secession rhexolytic..............11. Biotrophic, leaf-inhabiting, with distinct, subepidermal to erumpent,
well-developed sporodochia, or saxicolous, saprobic, sometimes causing
opportunistic human infections; radiating layers of hyphae arising from
sporodochia; conidiogenous cells without annellations; conidia in true simple
or branched basipetal chains, transversely 1- to pluriseptate or with
longitudinal and oblique septa (dictyosporous), occasionally
distoseptate......................................................................................................................To explain the arguments behind the selection and synonymies of some of
these anamorphic genera, they are briefly discussed below:Baker et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
70: 6270. 2004. (nom. inval.)Type species: Acidomyces richmondensis Baker et
al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 6270. 2004. (nom. inval.)Notes: The genus presently clusters among isolates in the
Teratosphaeria clade based on sequences deposited in GenBank.
Acidomyces lacks a Latin description and holotype specimen, and is
thus invalidly described. The genus, which was distinguished from other taxa
based on its DNA phylogeny (Dothideomycetes), forms filamentous
hyphae with disarticulating cells. It is unclear how it differs from
Friedmanniomyces Onofri and Pseudotaeniolina J.L. Crane
& Schokn.Marasas, P.S. van Wyk & Knox-Dav., J.
S. African Bot. 41: 41. 1975.Type species: Batcheloromyces proteae Marasas, P.S. van
Wyk & Knox-Dav., J. S. African Bot. 41: 43. 1975.Description: Crous et al.
(2004a; figs
4-26).
Fig. 4.
Batcheloromyces leucadendri in vitro. A-B.
Batcheloromyces state with synanamorph (arrows). C-D. Conidia
occurring solitary or in short chains. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Notes: Batcheloromyces is presently circumscribed as a
genus that forms emergent hyphae, giving rise to superficial sporodochial
plates, forming brown, verrucose, erect conidiophores that proliferate
holoblastically, with ragged percurrent proliferations that become visible
with age. Conidia are produced singly or in fragile, disarticulating chains,
are brown, thick-walled, 0-3 transversely euseptate (though at times they
appear as distoseptate). The genus Batcheloromyces has in recent
years been confused with Stigmina
(Sutton & Pascoe 1989) on
the basis that some collections showed conidiophores to give rise to solitary
conidia only, though conidial catenulation was clearly illustrated by Taylor
et al. (1999). In
culture colonies tend to sporulate in a slimy mass (on OA), though a
synanamorph can be seen (in B. leucadendri,
Fig. 4) to sporulate via
holoblastic conidiogenesis on hyphal tips of the aerial mycelium, forming
elongate-globose to ellipsoid, muriformly septate, thick-walled conidia, that
occur in clusters.The finding that Stigmina s. str. [based on S. platani
(Fuckel) Sacc., the type species] is a generic synonym of
Pseudocercospora Speg. (Crous
), and that the type species of
Trimmatostroma (T. salicis,
Fig. 5) belongs to the
Helotiales (Fig. 1),
raises the question of where to place stigmina- and trimmatostroma-like
anamorphs that reside in the Teratosphaeria clade. Although the
stigmina-like species can be accommodated in Batcheloromyces (see
Sutton & Pascoe 1989), a
new genus is required for Teratosphaeria anamorphs that have a
trimmatostroma-like morphology. The recognition of Batcheloromyces
and the introduction of a new anamorph genus for trimmatostroma-like anamorphs
of Teratosphaeria are also morphologically justified.
Batcheloromyces is easily distinguishable from Stigmina s.
str. by its special structure of the fruiting body, composed of
sporodochia and radiating layers of hyphae arising from the sporodochia and
the conidia often formed in delicate disarticulating chains.
Trimmatostroma-like anamorphs of Teratosphaeria are morphologically
also sufficently distinct from Trimmatostroma s. str. (see notes
under Catenulostroma Crous & U. Braun) as well as
Batcheloromyces (see key above).
Fig. 5.
Trimmatostroma salicis. A. Sporodochia on twig. B-E. Chains of
disarticulating conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.
(Alcorn) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504503.Basionym: Stigmina eucalypti Alcorn, Trans. Brit. Mycol.
Soc. 60: 151. 1973.Sugiy., in Sugiyama, Pleomorphic Fungi:
The Diversity and its Taxonomic Implications (Tokyo): 148. 1987.Type species: Capnobotryella renispora Sugiy., in
Sugiyama, Pleomorphic Fungi: The Diversity and its Taxonomic
Implications (Tokyo): 148. 1987.Description: Sugiyama & Amano
(1987, figs 7.5-7.8).Notes: The genus forms brown, septate, thick-walled hyphae, with
ellipsoidal, 0-1-septate conidia forming directly on the hyphae, via minute
phialides. Hambleton et al.
(2003) also noted the
occurrence of endoconidiation.Batcheloromyces leucadendri in vitro. A-B.
Batcheloromyces state with synanamorph (arrows). C-D. Conidia
occurring solitary or in short chains. Scale bar = 10 μm.Trimmatostroma salicis. A. Sporodochia on twig. B-E. Chains of
disarticulating conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Crous & U. Braun, gen. nov.
MycoBank
MB504474.Etymology: Named after its catenulate conidia, and stromata giving
rise to sporodochia.Hyphomycetes. Differt a Trimmatostromate habitu phytoparasitico, maculis
formantibus, conidiophoris saepe fasciculatis, per stoma emergentibus vel
habitu saxiphilo-saprophytico, interdum sejunctis ex mycosibus humanis.Habit plant pathogenic, leaf-spotting or saxicolous-saprobic,
occasionally isolated from opportunistic human mycoses. Mycelium
internal and external; hyphae dark brown, septate, branched. Conidiomata
in vivo vary from acervuli to sporodochia or fascicles of conidiophores
arising from well-developed or reduced, pseudoparenchymatal stromata.
Setae and hyphopodia absent. Conidiophores arising
from hyphae or stromata, solitary, fasciculate to sporodochial, in biotrophic,
plant pathogenic species emerging through stomata, little differentiated,
semimacronematous, branched or not, continuous to septate, brown, smooth to
verruculose. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal or
conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells, holoblastic-thalloblastic,
meristematic, unilocal, delimitation of conidium by a single septum with
retrogressive delimitation of next conidium giving an unconnected chain of
conidia, brown, smooth to verruculose, conidiogenous scars (conidiogenous
loci) inconspicuous, truncate, neither thickened nor darkened.
Conidia solitary or usually forming simple to branched basipetal
chains of transversely to muriformly eu- or distoseptate, 1- to multiseptate,
brown, smooth, verruculose to verrucose conidia, conidial secession
schizolytic.Type species: Catenulostroma protearum (Crous & M.E.
Palm) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov.Description: Crous & Palm
(1999), Crous et al.
(2004a; figs 364-365).Notes: Catenulostroma contains several plant pathogenic
species previously placed in Trimmatostroma, a morphologically
similar but, based on its type species, phylogenetically distinct genus
belonging to Helotiales (Fig.
1). Trimmatostroma s. str. is well-distinguished from
most Catenulostroma species by being saprobic, living on twigs and
branches of woody plants, or occasionally isolated from leaf litter, i.e.,
they are not associated with leaf spots. The conidiomata of
Trimmatostroma species are subepidermal, acervular-sporodochial with
a well defined wall of textura angularis, little differentiated,
micronematous conidiophores giving rise to long chains of conidia that
disarticulate at the surface to form a grey-black to brown powdery mass. The
generic affinity of other species assigned to Trimmatostroma, e.g.
those having a lichenicolous habit, is unresolved.Trimmatostroma abietis Butin & Pehl
(Butin )
clusters together with the plant pathogenic Catenulostroma species,
but differs from these species in having a more complex ecology.
Trimmatostroma abietis is usually foliicolous on living or necrotic
conifer needles on which characteristic acervuli to sporodochia with densely
arranged, fasciculate fertile hyphae are formed, comparable to the fasciculate
conidiomata of the plant pathogenic species of Catenulostroma
(Butin :
205, fig. 1). Although not
discussed by Butin et al.
(1996), T. abietis
needs to be compared to T. abietina Doherty, which was orginally
described from Abies balsamea needles collected in Guelph, Canada
(Doherty 1900).
Morphologically the two species appear to be synonymous, except for reference
to muriformly septate conidia, which is a feature not seen in vivo in
the type of T. abietis. Furthermore, as this is clearly a species
complex, this matter can only be resolved once fresh Canadian material has
been collected to serve as epitype for T. abietina.Isolates from stone, agreeing with T. abietis in cultural,
morphological and physiological characteristics, have frequently been found
(Wollenzien , Butin , Gorbushina , Kogej , Krumbein ). Furthermore, isolates from humans (ex skin lesions
and ex chronic osteomycelitis of humanpatients) and Ilex leaves are
known (Butin ). De Hoog et al.
(1999) included strains of
T. abietis from stone, man and Ilex leaves in molecular
sequence analyses and demonstrated their genetical identity based on 5.8S rDNA
and ITS2 data, but strains from conifer needles were not included.
Furthermore, we consider T. abietis, as presently defined, to
represent a species complex, with Dutch isolates from Pinus again
appearing distinct from German Abies isolates, suggesting that
different conifer genera could harbour different Catenulostroma
species. Isolates from stone form stromatic, durable microcolonies, which are
able to grow under extreme xerophilic environmental conditions. Cultural
growth resembles that of other meristematic black yeasts
(Butin ,
Kogej ).
Another fungus isolated from stone in Germany is in vitro
morphologically close to C. abietis, but differs in forming conidia
with oblique septa. Furthermore, a human pathogenic isolate from Africa
clusters together with other Catenulostroma species. The habit and
origin of this human pathogenic fungus in nature and its potential morphology
on “natural” substrates, which typically deviates strongly from
the growth in vitro, are still unknown. However, C. abietis,
usually growing as a foliicolous and saxicolous fungus, has already shown the
potential ability of Catenulostroma species to cause opportunistic
human infections.
Key to Catenulostroma species
1. Conidia formed in basipetal chains, smooth, 4-celled, consisting of two
basal cells with truncate lateral sides, each giving rise to a secondary
globose apical cell, that can extend and develop additional septa, appearing
as two lateral arms.................1. Conidia variable in shape, but without two basal cells giving rise to
two lateral
arms...............................................................................
22. Conidia smooth or almost so, at most very faintly rough-walled; usually
foliicolous on conifer needles or saxicolous, forming stromatic, xerophilic
durable microcolonies on stone, occasionally causing opportunistic human
infections............................................................ 32. Conidia distinctly verruculose to verrucose; plant pathogenic, forming
leaf
spots....................................................................................
53. Conidia (8-)20-35(-60) × 4-5(-7) μm,
1-10-septate...................................................................................3. Conidia much shorter, 8-20 μm long,
0-5-septate...................................................................................................................................
44. Conidia 0-5 times transversely septate, mostly two-celled; usually
foliicolous on conifer needles or saxicolous......................4. Conidia 2-4 times transversely septate and often with 1-2 oblique septa;
isolated from stone.......................................5. Conidia rather broad, usually wider than 10
μm.......................................................................................................................................
65. Conidia narrower, width below 10
μm.......................................................................................................................................................
76. Conidia distoseptate, rather long, (12-)25-35(-45) ×
(7-)10-15(-25) μm; conidiomata large, up to 250 μm diam, on Protea
anceps..............................................................................................................................................................................................6. Conidia euseptate, shorter, (9-)16-20(-36) × (10-)14-18(-27)
μm; sporodochia 90-100 × 40-80 μm; on Protea
grandiceps................................................................................................................................................................................................7. Conidia 1- to multiseptate, (10-)15-17(-23) × (5-)6.5-7(-9) μm;
on various
Proteaceae.................................................7. Conidia in vivo predominantly 1-septate, (8-)13-15(-21) ×
(3.5-)5.5-6(-8) μm; on Protea
cynaroides........................................................................................................................................(Butin & Pehl) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504504.Catenulostroma chromoblastomycosum (type material). A.
Sporodochium on pine needle in vitro. B-H. Chains of disarticulating
conidia. Scale bars: A = 350, B, E, G, H = 10 μm.Basionym: Trimmatostroma abietis Butin & Pehl,
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 69: 204. 1996.Notes: Catenulostroma abietis needs to be compared to
Trimmatostroma abietina Doherty (Abies balsamea needles
Canada), which is either an older name for this species, or a closely related
taxon. Presently T. abietina is not known from culture, and needs to
be recollected.Crous & U. Braun,
sp. nov. MycoBank
MB504505.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Catenulostroma chromoblastomycosum (type material). A.
Sporodochium on pine needle in vitro. B-H. Chains of disarticulating
conidia. Scale bars: A = 350, B, E, G, H = 10 μm.
Etymology: Named after the disease symptoms observed due to
opportunistic human infection.Differt a C. abieti et C. germanico conidiis longioribus, (8-)20-35(-60)
× 4-5(-7) μm, 1-10-septatis.Description based on cultures sporulating on WA supplemented with sterile
pine needles. Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth to
finely verruculose, medium to dark brown, thick-walled, 3-4 μm wide hyphae.
Conidiomata brown, superficial, sporodochial, up to 350 μm diam.
Conidiophores reduced to inconspicuous conidiogenous loci on hyphae,
2-4 μm wide, neither darkened nor thickened or refractive. Conidia
occurring in branched chains, that tend to remain attached to each other,
subcylindrical with subtruncate ends, straight to slightly curved,
(8-)20-35(-60) × 4-5(-7) μm, 1-10-septate, medium brown, smooth to
finely verruculose.Catenulostroma germanicum (type material). A-D. Chains of
disarticulating conidia in vitro. Scale bars = 10 μm.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA erumpent, spreading,
slow growing, with sparse to moderate aerial mycelium and smooth, irregular,
submerged margins; greenish black (surface).Specimen examined: Zaire, Pawa, isolated from man with
chromoblastomycosis, Mar. 1997, V. de Brouwere, holotype
CBS H-19935,
culture ex-type CBS
597.97.Notes: Catenulostroma chromoblastomycosum was originally
identified as an isolate of Stenella araguata Syd. The latter fungus
is morphologically distinct, however, having much shorter and narrower
conidia, formed in acropetal chains, as well as quite different conidiogenous
loci and conidial hila which are small, thickened and darkened.(Joanne E. Taylor & Crous)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504506.Basionym: Trimmatostroma elginense Joanne E. Taylor &
Crous, Mycol. Res.104: 633. 2000.Catenulostroma excentricum, see .Crous & U. Braun, sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB504507.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Catenulostroma germanicum (type material). A-D. Chains of
disarticulating conidia in vitro. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Etymology: Named after the geographic location of its type strain
in Germany.Differt a C. abieti conidiis 1-2 oblique septatis.Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth, pale to medium
brown, 2-4 μm wide hyphae, giving rise to conidial chains.
Conidiophores integrated, subcylindrical, branched or not, septate,
little differentiated, micronematous, 3-5 μm wide, 3- to multiseptate,
medium brown, thick-walled; conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal,
inconspicuous, unilocal, conidiogenous loci inconspicuous. Conidia in
simple or branched basipetal chains, subcylindrical, straight to flexuous,
(8-)10-15(-20) × 4-5(-6) μm, 2-4 transversely septate or with 1-2
oblique septa, medium to dark brown, thick-walled, smooth.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on OA erumpent, spreading, with
even, smooth margins and sparse to moderate aerial mycelium; olivaceous-grey,
with iron-grey margins (surface). Colonies reaching 12 mm diam after 1 mo at
25 °C in the dark; colonies fertile.Specimen examined: Germany (former West-Germany), isolated
from stone, Oct. 1988, J. Kuroczkin, holotype
CBS H-19936,
culture ex-type CBS
539.88.Notes: Catenulostroma germanicum was originally deposited
as Taeniolina scripta (P. Karst.) P.M. Kirk. It is clearly distinct,
however, as the latter fungus forms intricate, branched, brown conidia
(Kirk 1981), unlike those of
C. germanicum. Phylogenetically C. germanicum forms part of
the C. abietis species complex.(Sacc.) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504508.Basionym: Coniothecium macowanii Sacc., Syll. Fung. 4:
512. 1886.≡ Coniothecium punctiforme G. Winter, Hedwigia 24: 33. 1885,
non C. punctiforme Corda, Icones Fungorum (Prague) 1: 2.
1837.≡ Trimmatostroma macowanii (Sacc.) M.B. Ellis, More
Dematiacous Hyphomycetes: 29. 1976.Catenulostroma microsporum, see .(Crous & M.E. Palm) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504509.Basionym: Trimmatostroma protearum Crous & M.E. Palm,
Mycol. Res. 103: 1303. 1999.Crous, Fungal Diversity 26: 151. 2007.Type species: Cibiessia dimorphospora Crous & C. Mohammed,
Fungal Diversity 26: 151. 2007.Description: Crous et al.
(2007b; figs
3-5).Notes: The genus Cibiessia was introduced to accommodate
species with chains of disarticulating conidia (arthroconidia). Some species
have been shown to have a Readeriella synanamorph.Seifert & N.L. Nick., Can. J. Bot. 82: 919.
2004.Type species: Devriesia staurophora (W.B. Kendr.) Seifert
& N.L. Nick., Canad. J. Bot. 82: 919. 2004.Description: Seifert et al.
(2004; figs
2-42).Notes: The genus is characterised by producing chains of pale
brown, subcylindrical to fusiform, 0-1-septate conidia with somewhat
thickened, darkened hila, forming chlamydospores in culture, and being heat
resistant. Morphologically they resemble taxa placed in
Pseudocladosporium U. Braun (= Fusicladium Bonord.;
Venturiaceae), though phylogenetically Devriesia is not
allied to this family.Nishim. & Miyaji, Jap. J. Med. Mycol. 26: 145.
1984.Type species: Hortaea werneckii (Horta) Nishim. &
Miyaji, Jap. J. Med. Mycol. 26: 145. 1984.Description: de Hoog et al.
(2000, illust. p. 721).Notes: The genus forms brown, septate, thick-walled hyphae, with
ellipsoidal, 0-1-septate (becoming muriformly septate), hyaline to pale brown
conidia forming directly on the hyphae, via phialides with percurrent
proliferation. Isolates of H. werneckii are restricted to tropical or
subtropical areas, where they occur as halophilic saprobes, frequently being
associated with tinea nigra of humans
(de Hoog ). The generic distinction with Capnobotryella is
less clear, except that the latter tends to have darker, thick-walled conidia,
and reduced, less prominent phialides.Crous & U. Braun, gen. nov. MycoBank
MB504463.Etymology: Named after its penicillate conidiophores.Differt a Periconiellae conidiophoris apice penicillato ex cellulis
conidiogenis et ramoconidiis compositis, cellulis conidiogenis saepe 1-3(-4)
locis conidiogenis, terminalibus vel subterminalibus, subdenticulatis, non vel
subincrassatis, non vel leviter fuscatis-refractivis, ramoconidiis
praesentibus, saepe numerosis, conidiis ramicatenatis.Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth to verruculose,
subhyaline to pale brown hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous,
occasionally also with some micronematous conidiophores; macronematous
conidiophores arising from superficial mycelium or stromata, solitary,
fasciculate or in synnemata, erect, brown, thin- to thick-walled, smooth to
finely verruculose; terminally penicillate, branched terminal part consisting
of a conidiogenous apparatus composed of a series of conidiogenous cells
and/or ramoconidia. Conidiogenous cells integrated, terminal,
intercalary or pleurogenous, unbranched, pale to medium brown, smooth to
finely verruculose, tapering to a flattened or rounded apical region or tips
slightly inflated, polyblastic, sympodial, giving rise to a single or several
sets of ramoconidia on different levels; with relatively few conidiogenous
loci, 1-3(-4), terminal or subterminal, subdenticulate, denticle-like loci
usually conical, terminally truncate, usually unthickened or at most very
slightly thickened, not to slightly darkened or somewhat refractive.
Conidia in branched acropetal chains. Ramoconidia
0-1-septate, pale to medium brown, smooth to verruculose, thin-walled,
ellipsoidal, obovoid, fusiform, subcylindrical to obclavate; conidia
subcylindrical, fusiform to ellipsoid-ovoid, 0-1-septate, pale olivaceous to
brown, smooth to verruculose, thin-walled, catenate; hila truncate,
unthickened or almost so, barely to somewhat darkened-refractive.Type species: Penidiella columbiana Crous & U. Braun,
sp. nov.Notes: Three ramichloridium-like genera cluster within
Capnodiales, namely Periconiella Sacc. [type: P.
velutina (G. Winter) Sacc.], Ramichloridium Stahel ex de Hoog
[type: R. apiculatum (J.H. Mill., Giddens & A.A. Foster) de Hoog]
and Penidiella [type: P. columbiana Crous & U. Braun].
All three genera have brown, macronematous conidiophores with similar conidial
scars. Within this complex, Ramichloridium is distinct in having a
prominent rachis giving rise to solitary conidia. Periconiella and
Penidiella are branched in the apical part of their conidiophores,
and lack a rachis. In Periconiella conidia are solitary or formed in
short, mostly simple chains, ramoconidia are lacking. The apical conidiogenous
apparatus is composed of conidiogenous cells or branches with integrated,
usually terminal conidiogenous cells, which are persistent. The conidiogenous
cells are subcylindrical to somewhat clavate, usually not distinctly
attenuated towards the tip, and have several, often numerous loci, aggregated
or spread over the whole cell, terminal to usually lateral, flat,
non-protuberant, not denticle-like, usually distinctly thickened and darkened,
at least at the rim. In contrast, Penidiella has a quite distinct
branching system, consisting of a single terminal conidiogenous cell giving
rise to several ramoconidia that form secondary ramoconidia, etc., or the
branched apparatus is composed of several terminal and sometimes lateral
conidiogenous cells giving rise to sequences of ramoconidia (conidiogenous
cells and ramoconidia are often barely distinguishable, with conidiogenous
cells disarticulating, becoming ramoconidia). The branched apparatus may be
loose to dense, metula-like. The conidiogenous cells have only few, usually
1-3 (-4), terminal or subterminal subdenticulate loci, and ramoconidia are
prominent and numerous, giving rise to branched chains of secondary conidia
with flat-tipped hila. Some species of Penidiella with compact,
metula-like branched apices are morphologically close to
Metulocladosporiella Crous, Schroers, J.Z. Groenew., U. Braun &
K. Schub. (Crous ). This genus encompasses two species of banana diseases
belonging to Herpotrichiellaceae (Chaetothyriales),
characterised by having conidiophore bases with rhizoid hyphal appendages and
abundant micronematous conidiophores. Penidiella species with less
pronounced penicillate apices, e.g. P. strumelloidea (Milko &
Dunaev) Crous & U. Braun, are comparable with species of the genus
Pleurotheciopsis B. Sutton (see
Ellis 1976). The latter genus
is distinct in having unbranched, often percurrently proliferating
conidiophores, lacking ramoconidia and colourless conidia formed in simple
chains.Cladosporium helicosporum R.F. Castañeda & W.B. Kendr.
(Castañeda ) is another penidiella-like fungus with terminally branched
conidiophores, subdenticulate conidiogenous loci and conidia in long acropetal
chains, but its affinity to Penidiella has still to be proven.
Key to Penidiella species
1. Conidiophores in vivo in well-developed, dense fascicles and
distinct synnemata arising from a basal stroma; on fallen leaves of
Ficus sp.,
Cuba...............................................................................................................................................................................1. Conidiophores solitary, at most loosely
aggregated..................................................................................................................................
22. Conidiophores with a terminal conidiogenous cell, often somewhat
swollen, giving rise to several ramoconidia (on one level) that form chains of
straight to distinctly curved conidia; isolated from leaf of Carex
sp., Russia....................................................2. Penicillate apex of the conidiophores composed of a system of true
branchlets, conidiogenous cells and ramoconidia or at least a sequence of
ramoconidia on several levels; conidia usually
straight.........................................................................................................................
33. Mycelium verruculose; long filiform conidiophores ending with a
subdenticulate cell giving rise to sets of penicillate conidiogenous cells or
ramoconidia which are barely distinguishable and turn into each other;
ramoconidia and conidia consistently narrow, (1.5-)2(-2.5) μm wide, and
aseptate, ramoconidia sometimes heterochromous; on living leaves of
Nectandra coriacea, Cuba...................3. Mycelium more or less smooth; penicillate apex at least partly with true
branchlets; conidia wider, 2-5 μm, at least partly septate, uniformly
pigmented.................................................................................................................................................................................................
44. Hyphae, conidiophores and conidia frequently distinctly constricted at
the septa; penicillate apex of the conidiophores sparingly developed,
branchlets more or less divergent; isolated from leaf litter of
Smilax sp.,
Cuba..................................................................4. Hyphae and conidia without distinct constrictions at the septa;
penicillate apex of the conidiophores usually well-developed, with abundant
branchings.................................................................................................................................................................................................
55. Conidiophores short, up to 120 × 3-4 μm, frequently with
intercalary conidiogenous cell, swollen at the conidiogenous portion just
below the upper septum which render the conidiophores subnodulose to
distinctly nodulose, apex ± loosely penicillate; conidia (4-)5-7(-8)
μm long; occasionally with micronematous conidiophores; isolated from man
with tinea nigra, Venezuela.........................5. Conidiophores much longer, up to 800 μm, 7-9 μm wide at the base,
not distinctly nodulose, penicillate apex loose to often more compact, tight,
metula-like; conidia longer, 7-25 × 2-5 μm; micronematous
conidiophores lacking; isolated from dead leaf of Paepalanthus
columbianus,
Colombia.......................................................................................................................................................Crous & U. Braun, sp. nov.
MycoBank MB504510.
Figs
8-9.
Fig. 8.
Penidiella columbiana (type material). A. Conidiophores on pine
needle in vitro. B-H. Conidiophores with chains of disarticulating
conidia. Scale bars: A = 450, B-C = 10 μm.
Fig. 9.
Penidiella columbiana (type material). A. Conidiophores. B.
Ramoconidia. C. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun
del.
Etymology: Named after its country of origin, Colombia.Mycelium ex hyphis ramosis, septatis, levibus, pallide brunneis, 2-3 μm
latis compositum. Conidiophora ex hyphis superficialibus oriunda, penicillata,
erecta, brunnea, crassitunicata, minute verruculosa, ad 800 μm longa, ad
basim 7-9 μm lata, ad apicem pluriramosa, ex ramibus diversibus et cellulis
conidiogenis composita, ramibus primariis (-2) subcylindraceis, 1-7-septatis,
50-120 × 4-6 μm; ramibus secundariis (-2) subcylindraceis,
1-5-septatis, 40-60 × 4-6 μm; ramibus tertiariis et subsequentibus
1-4-septatis, 10-30 × 3-5 μm. Cellulae conidiogenae terminales vel
laterales, non ramosae, 5-15 × 3-5 μm, modice brunneae, minute
verruculosae, apicem versus attenuatae, truncatae vel rotundatae,
polyblasticae, sympodiales, cicatrices conidiales incrassatae, sed leviter
fuscatae et non refractivae. Ramoconidia 0-1-septata, modice brunnea, levia,
ellipsoidea, obclavata vel obovoidea, cum 1-3 hilis terminalibus, 10-20
× 3-5 μm; conidia subcylindrica vel ellipsoidea, 0-1-septata, pallide
brunnea, catenata (-10), hila truncata, non incrassata, vix vel leviter
fuscata.Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth, pale brown, 2-3
μm wide hyphae. Conidiophores arising from superficial mycelium,
terminally penicillate, erect, brown, wall up to 1 μm wide, almost smooth
to finely verruculose, up to 800 μm tall, 7-9 μm wide at the base;
conidiogenous region consisting of a series of branches composed of true
branchlets, conidiogenous cells and ramoconidia, branched portion usually
rather compact, even metula-like, but also looser, with divergent branches;
primary branches (-2), subcylindrical, 1-7-septate, 50-120 × 4-6 μm;
secondary branches (-2), subcylindrical, 1-5-septate, 40-60 × 4-6 μm;
tertiary and additional branches 1-4-septate, 10-30 × 3-5 μm.
Conidiogenous cells terminal, intercalary or lateral, unbranched,
5-15 × 3-5 μm, medium brown, finely verruculose, tapering to a
flattened or rounded (frequently swollen) apical region, scars thickened, but
only somewhat darkened, not refractive. Ramoconidia 0-1-septate,
medium brown, smooth, wall ≤ 1 μm wide, ellipsoidal to obclavate or
obovoid, with 1-3 apical hila, 10-25 × 3-5 μm, ramoconidia with
broadly truncate base, not or barely attenuated, up to 4 μm wide, or at
least somewhat attenuated at the base, hila 1.5-3 μm wide. Conidia
subcylindrical to ellipsoid, 0(-1)-septate, pale brown, in chains of up to 10,
7-15 × 2-3 μm, hila truncate, unthickened, barely to somewhat
darkened, 1-2 μm wide.Penidiella columbiana (type material). A. Conidiophores on pine
needle in vitro. B-H. Conidiophores with chains of disarticulating
conidia. Scale bars: A = 450, B-C = 10 μm.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA erumpent, spreading,
with moderate aerial mycelium and smooth, even, submerged margins;
olivaceous-grey in central part, iron-grey in outer region (surface); colonies
fertile.Specimen examined: Colombia, Páramo de Guasca, 3400
m alt., isolated from dead leaf of Paepalanthus columbianus
(Eriocaulaceae), Aug. 1980, W. Gams, holotype
CBS H-19937,
culture ex-type CBS
486.80.Notes: This isolate was originally identified as belonging to the
Stenella araguata species complex. The latter name has been somewhat
confused in the literature, and has been incorrectly applied to isolates
associated with opportunistic human infections
(de Hoog ). The “araguata” species complex is
treated elsewhere in the volume (see Crous
- this volume).(R.F. Castañeda) U. Braun, Crous
& R.F. Castañeda, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504511.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10.
Penidiella cubensis (type material). A. Swollen stromatic base of
synnema. B. Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bar =
10 μm. U. Braun del.
Basionym: Cladosporium cubense R.F. Castañeda,
Fungi Cubenses II (La Habana): 4. 1987.In vivo: Colonies on fallen leaves, amphigenous, effuse,
pilose, brown. Mycelium usually external, superficial, but also
internal, composed of branched, septate, brown, thin-walled, smooth to
rough-walled hyphae, 2-3 μm wide. Stromata present, 40-80 μm
diam, brown, immersed. Conidiophores densely fasciculate or in
distinct synnemata, arising from stromata, erect, synnemata up to about 1000
μm long and (10-)20-40(-50) μm wide, individual threads filiform,
pluriseptate throughout, brown, thin-walled (≤ 0.5 μm), smooth or almost
so to distinctly verruculose, apically penicillate. Conidiogenous
cells integrated, terminal and intercalary, 10-30 μm long,
subcylindrical, terminal conidiogenous cells often slightly enlarged at the
tip, with (1-)2-3(-4) terminal or subterminal subdenticulate conidiogenous
loci, short conically truncate, 1-2 μm diam, unthickened or almost so, but
often slightly refractive or darkened-refractive, intercalary conidiogenous
cells usually with a single lateral locus just below the upper septum,
conidiogenous cells giving rise to a single set of primary ramoconidia, or a
sequence of ramoconidia at different levels. Ramoconidia cylindrical
to ellipsoid-fusoid, 8-18(-25) × 2-3 μm, aseptate, pale olivaceous,
olivaceous-brown to brown, thin-walled, smooth or almost so to faintly
verruculose, ramoconidia with broadly truncate base, barely narrowed, or
ramoconidia more or less attenuated at the base, hila 1-2 μm wide,
unthickened or almost so, but often slightly refractive or
darkened-refractive. Conidia in long acropetal chains, narrowly
ellipsoid-ovoid, fusiform, 5-12(-15) × (1-)1.5-3 μm, aseptate, pale
olivaceous to brownish, thin-walled, smooth to faintly rough-walled, ends
attenuated, hila 1-1.5 μm wide, unthickened, not darkened, at most somewhat
refractive.Penidiella columbiana (type material). A. Conidiophores. B.
Ramoconidia. C. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun
del.Specimen examined: Cuba, Guantánamo, Maisí,
on fallen leaves of Ficus sp., 24 Apr. 1986, M. Camino,
holotype INIFAT C86/134 (HAL 2019 F, ex holotype).Notes: Cladosporium cubense was not available in culture
and molecular sequence data are not available, but type material could be
re-examined and revealed that this species is quite distinct from
Cladosporium s. str., but agreeing with the concept of the genus
Penidiella. Penidiella cubensis differs from all other species of
this genus in having densely fasciculate conidiophores to synnematous
conidiomata, arising from stromata.Crous, U. Braun & R.F.
Castañeda, nom. nov. MycoBank
MB504512.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11.
Penidiella nectandrae (type material). A. Conidiophores. B.
Ramoconidia. C. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun
del.
Basionym: Cladosporium ferrugineum R.F. Castañeda,
Fungi Cubenses II (La Habana): 4. 1987, homonym, non C.
ferrugineum Allesch., 1895.In vivo: Colonies amphigenous, brown. Mycelium
internal and external, superficial, composed of sparingly branched hyphae,
septate, 1-3 μm wide, pale olivaceous-brown or brown, thin-walled (≤ 0.5
μm), smooth or almost so to distinctly verruculose, fertile cells giving
rise to conidiophores somewhat swollen at the branching point, up to 5 μm
diam, and somewhat darker. Stromata lacking. Conidiophores
erect, straight, filiform, up to 350 μm long, 2.5-4 μm wide,
pluriseptate throughout, brown, darker below and paler above, thin-walled,
smooth, apex penicillate, terminal cell of the conidiophore with 2-4 short
denticle-like loci giving rise to sets of conidiogenous cells or ramoconidia
that then form a sequence of new sets of ramoconidia on different levels,
i.e., the loose to dense, metula-like branching system is composed of
conidiogenous cells and ramoconidia which are often barely distinguishable and
turn into each other; conidiogenous loci terminal or subterminal,
usually 1-3(-4), subdenticulate, 1-2 μm diam, conical, apically truncate,
unthickened or almost so, not to somewhat darkened-refractive.
Ramoconidia with truncate base, barely attenuated, or ramoconidia
distinctly attenuated at the truncate base, up to 20 × 2 μm,
aseptate, at the apex with 2-3(-4) subdenticulate hila, subcylindrical, very
pale olivaceous, olivaceous-brown to brown, sometimes with different shades of
brown (heterochromatous), thin-walled (≤ 0.5 μm), smooth to faintly
verruculose. Conidia in long acropetal chains, narrowly
ellipsoid-ovoid, fusiform to cylindrical, 5-16 × (1.5-)2(-2.5) μm,
aseptate, very pale olivaceous, olivaceous-brown to brown, thin-walled, smooth
to very faintly rough-walled, primary conidia with rounded apex and trunacte
base, somewhat attenuated, secondary conidia truncate at both ends, hila 1-1.5
μm diam, unthickened or almost so, at most slightly
darkened-refractive.Penidiella cubensis (type material). A. Swollen stromatic base of
synnema. B. Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bar =
10 μm. U. Braun del.Penidiella nectandrae (type material). A. Conidiophores. B.
Ramoconidia. C. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun
del.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA slimy, smooth,
spreading; aerial mycelium absent, margins smooth, irregular; surface black
with patches of cream. Colonies reaching 20 mm diam after 1 mo at 25 °C in
the dark; colonies sterile on PDA, SNA and OA.Specimen examined: Cuba, Matanzas, San Miguel de los
Baños, isolated from living leaves of Nectandra coriacea
(Lauraceae), 24 Jan. 1987, R.F. Castañeda and G. Arnold,
holotype INIFAT C87/45, culture ex-type
CBS 734.87, and HAL
2018 F (ex-holotype).Notes: Although the ex-type strain of Cladosporium
ferrugineum is sterile, its LSU DNA phylogeny reveals it to be unrelated
to Cladosporium s. str. (see Fig.
1 in Crous - this volume). Based on a re-examination of the type
material it could clearly be shown that the morphology of this species fully
agrees with the concept of the new genus Penidiella, which is
supported by its phylogenetic position within Capnodiales.Crous, R.F. Castañeda &
U. Braun, sp. nov. MycoBank
MB504513. Figs
12-13.
Fig. 12.
Penidiella rigidophora (type material). A-F. Micronematous
conidiophores giving rise to chains of conidia. G-H. Macronematous
conidiophores (note base in G, and apex in H). I. Conidia. Scale bars = 10
μm.
Fig. 13.
Penidiella rigidophora (type material). A. Hyphae. B.
Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U.
Braun del.
≡ Cladosporium rigidophorum R.F. Castañeda, nom. nud.
(herbarium name).Differt a specibus Penidiellae conidiophoris dimorphosis, hyphis et
conidiis ad septa saepe distincte constrictis.Mycelium consisting of strongly branched, septate, smooth or
almost so, pale olivaceous to medium brown, guttulate, commonly constricted at
septa, 2-6 μm wide hyphae, swollen cells up to 8 μm wide, wall up to
1(-1.5) μm wide. Conidiophores dimorphic. Macronematous
conidiophores separate, erect, subcylindrical, predominantly straight to
slightly curved, terminally loosely penicillate, up to 120 μm long, and 4-5
μm wide at the base, which is neither lobed nor swollen, and lacks
rhizoids, up to 10-septate, medium to dark brown, wall up to 1(-1.5) μm
wide. Micronematous conidiophores erect, subcylindrical, up to 40
μm tall, 3-4 μm wide, 1-3-septate, pale to medium brown (concolorous
with hyphae). Conidiogenous cells predominantly terminal, rarely
intercalary, medium brown, smooth, subcylindrical, but frequently swollen at
apex, 10-20 × 5-6 μm, loci (predominantly single in micronematous
conidiophores, but up to 4 in macronematous conidiophores) flat-tipped,
sub-denticulate or not, 1-1.5 μm wide, barely to slightly darkened and
thickened-refractive. Conidia in branched chains, medium brown,
verruculose, (appearing like small spines under light microscope), ellipsoid
to cylindrical-oblong, up to 1(-1.5) μm wide, frequently constricted at
septa, which turn dark with age; ramoconidia (10-)13-17(-25) × 3-4(-5)
μm, 1(-3)-septate; secondary conidia (7-)8-10(-12) × 3-4(-5); hila
unthickened to very slightly thickened and darkened, not refractive,
(0.5-)1(-1.5) μm.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA erumpent, spreading,
with lobate margins and moderate aerial mycelium; iron-grey (surface), with a
greenish black margin; reverse greenish black. Colonies reaching 20 mm diam
after 1 mo at 25 °C in the dark; colonies fertile.Specimen examined: Cuba, isolated from leaf litter of
Smilax sp. (Smilacaceae), 6. Nov. 1994, R.F.
Castañeda, holotype
CBS H-19938,
culture ex-type CBS
314.95.Penidiella rigidophora (type material). A-F. Micronematous
conidiophores giving rise to chains of conidia. G-H. Macronematous
conidiophores (note base in G, and apex in H). I. Conidia. Scale bars = 10
μm.Notes: Cladosporium rigidophorum is a herbarium name,
which was never validly published. The ex-type strain, however, represents a
new species of Penidiella, for which a valid name with Latin
diagnosis is herewith provided. This species is easily distinguishable from
all other taxa of Penidiella by forming distinct constrictions at
hyphal and conidial septa as well as micronematous conidiophores (except for
P. venezuelensis in which a few micronematous conidiophores have been
observed). It is also phylogenetically distinct from the other taxa of
Penidiella (see Fig. 1
in Crous
- this volume).(Milko & Dunaev) Crous &
U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504514. Figs
14-15.
Penidiella strumelloidea (type material). A. Hyphae. B.
Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm. U.
Braun del.
Penidiella rigidophora (type material). A. Hyphae. B.
Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U.
Braun del.Penidiella strumelloidea (type material). A-B. Micronematous
conidiophores. C-D. Macronematous conidiophores. E-G. Conidia. Scale bars = 10
μm.Basionym: Cladosporium strumelloideum Milko & Dunaev,
Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 23: 134. 1986.Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth, hyaline to pale
olivaceous, 1-4 μm wide hyphae, sometimes constricted at somewhat darker
septa. Conidiophores solitary, erect, arising from superficial
mycelium, micronematous, i.e., reduced to conidiogenous cells, or
macronematous, subcylindrical, straight to slightly curved, subcylindrical
throughout or often somewhat attenuated towards the apex, 12-80 ×
(2-)2.5-4 μm, 0-6-septate, medium brown, smooth, wall ≤ 0.75 μm,
penicillate apex formed by a terminal conidiogenous cell giving rise to a
single set of ramoconidia. Conidiogenous cells terminal, integrated,
subcylindrical, straight, 8-12 × 1.5-2(-2.5) μm, pale brown,
thin-walled, smooth, apex obtusely rounded to somewhat clavate; loci terminal,
occasionally subterminal or lateral, unthickened or almost so to slightly
thickened and darkened, not refractive, 1-1.5 μm wide. Conidia in
branched chains; ramoconidia subcylindrical, with 1-3 terminal loci,
olivaceous-brown, smooth; secondary conidia ellipsoidal, with one side
frequently straight and the other convex, straight to slightly curved,
(8-)10-12(-20) × 2(-3) μm, subhyaline to olivaceous-brown, smooth,
thin-walled; hila unthickened or almost so to somewhat thickened and darkened,
not refractive, 1 μm wide.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on PDA erumpent, spreading,
with abundant, dense to woolly aerial mycelium, and uneven, feathery margins;
surface pale olivaceous grey, reverse iron-grey. Colonies reaching 25 mm diam
after 1 mo at 25 °C in the dark; colonies fertile.Specimen examined: Russia, Yaroslavl Region, Rybinsk
Reservoir, mouth of Sutka River, isolated from leaf of Carex sp.
(Cyperaceae), from stagnant water, S. Ozerskaya, holotype
BKMF-2534, culture ex-type CBS
114484.Notes: Penidiella strumelloidea resembles other species
of Penidiella by having penicillate conidiophores with a
conidiogenous apparatus giving rise to branched conidial chains. It differs,
however, from all other species of this genus in having a rather simple
penicillate apex composed of a single terminal conidiogenous cell giving rise
to one set of ramoconidia which form frequently somewhat curved conidia. It is
also phylogenetically distinct from the other taxa of Penidiella (see
Fig. 1 in
Crous -
this volume).Penidiella strumelloidea (type material). A. Hyphae. B.
Conidiophores. C. Ramoconidia. D. Secondary conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm. U.
Braun del.Crous & U. Braun, sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB504515. Figs
16-17.
Fig. 16.
Penidiella venezuelensis (type material). A. Microconidiophore. B.
Apical part of macroconidiophore. C-F. Chains of conidia. Scale bars = 10
μm.
Fig. 17.
Penidiella venezuelensis (type material). A. Hypha. B.
Micronematous conidiophores. C. Macronematous conidiophores. D-E. Ramoconidia.
F. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun del.
Etymology: Named after the geographic location of its type strain,
Venezuela.Differt a P. columbiana conidiophoris bevioribus et angustioribus, ad 20
× 3-4 μm, subnodulosis, apice plus minusve laxe penicillatis et
conidiis brevioribus, (4-)5-7(-8) μm longis.Mycelium consisting of branched, septate, smooth to faintly
rough-walled, thin-walled, subhyaline, pale olivaceous to medium brown,
(1.5-)2-3 μm wide hyphae. Conidiophores solitary, erect,
macronematous, subcylindrical, straight to flexuous to once geniculate, up to
120 μm long, 3-4 μm wide, 1-12-septate, pale to medium olivaceous-brown
or brown, thin-walled (up to about 1 μm), terminally penicillate, branched
portion composed of true branchlets and/or a single set or several sets of
ramoconidia, branchlets up to 50 μm long; occasionally with a few
additional micronematous conidiophores, about 10-15 × 2-3 μm.
Conidiogenous cells terminal and intercalary, unbranched,
subcylindrical, 5-12 × 3-4 μm, medium brown, smooth or almost so to
finely verruculose, apex of conidiogenous cells frequently swollen, up to 6
μm diam, with 1-3(-4) flat-tipped, non to slightly thickened, non to
slightly darkened-refractive loci, 1-1.5 μm wide, frequently appearing
subdenticulate, up to 1.5 μm long, intercalary conidiogenous cells also
slightly swollen at the conidiogenous portion just below the upper septum,
which render the conidiophores subnodulose to nodulose, swellings round about
the conidiophore axis or unilateral. Conidia ellipsoid-ovoid,
subcylindrical, pale to medium olivaceous-brown or brown, finely verruculose,
wall ≤ 0.5 μm wide, guttulate or not, occurring in branched chains.
Ramoconidia 0-1(-3)-septate, 5-15(-22) × 3-4(-5) μm, with
1-3 subdenticulate apical hila; secondary conidia 0(-1)-septate, ellipsoid,
obovoid to irregular, (4-)5-7(-8) × (2-)2.5-3(-4) μm; hila non to
slightly thickened, non to slightly darkened-refractive, (0.5-)1(-1.5) μm
wide.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on OA erumpent, spreading, with
dense, compact aerial mycelium, and even, smooth margins; olivaceous-grey
(surface), margins iron-grey. Colonies reaching 22 mm diam after 1 mo at 25
°C in the dark.Specimen examined: Venezuela, isolated from man with
tinea nigra, Jan. 1975, D. Borelli, holotype
CBS H-19934,
culture ex-type CBS
106.75.Notes: The type culture of Penidiella venezuelensis was
originally determined as Stenella araguata from which it is, however,
quite distinct by having smooth mycelium, long penicillate conidiophores with
subdenticulate conidiogenous loci, smaller conidia, and agreeing with the
concept of the genus Penidiella. It is phylogenetically distinct from
the other taxa of Penidiella (see
Fig. 1 in
Crous -
this volume).J.L. Crane & Schokn., Mycologia 78:
88. 1986.? = Friedmanniomyces Onofri, Nova Hedwigia 68: 176. 1999.Type species: Pseudotaeniolina convolvuli (Esfand.) J.L.
Crane & Schokn., Mycologia 78: 88. 1986.Description: Crane & Schoknecht
(1986, figs
3-19).
Fig. 19.
Readeriella brunneotingens (type material). A. Leaf spot. B.
Colony on MEA. C-D. Conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Notes: No cultures or sequence data are available of the type
species, and Pseudotaeniolina globosa De Leo, Urzì & de
Hoog was placed in Pseudotaeniolina based on its morphology and
ecology. The genus Friedmanniomyces is presently known from two
species (Selbmann ). Morphologically Friedmanniomyces is similar to
Pseudotaeniolina, but fresh material of Pseudotaeniolina
convolvuli needs to be recollected before this can be clarified.Syd. & P. Syd., Ann. Mycol. 6: 484.
1908.= Kirramyces J. Walker, B. Sutton & Pascoe, Mycol. Res. 96:
919. 1992.= Colletogloeopsis Crous & M.J. Wingf., Canad. J. Bot. 75:
668. 1997.Synanamorphs: Crous, Fungal Diversity
26: 151. 2007; also pseudocercospora-like, see Crous
(1998).Type species: Readeriella mirabilis Syd. & P. Syd.,
Ann. Mycol. 6: 484. 1908.Description: Crous et al.
(2004b; figs 36-38).Notes: Several coelomycete genera are presently available to
accommodate anamorphs of Capnodiales that reside in
Teratosphaeriaceae, for which Readeriella is the oldest
name. Other genera such as Phaeophleospora Rangel,
Sonderhenia H.J. Swart & J. Walker and Lecanosticta Syd.
belong to Mycosphaerellaceae.Readeriella is polyphyletic within Teratosphaeriaceae.
The recognition and circumscription (synonymy) of this genus follows the
principles for anamorph genera within Capnodiales as outlined in the
introduction to this volume. The only unifying character is conidial
pigmentation, and the mode of conidiogenesis. Conidiogenous cells range from
mono- to polyphialides with periclinal thickening, to phialides with
percurrent proliferation, as observed in the type species, R.
mirabilis (Fig. 18).
Within the form genus conidia vary from aseptate to multiseptate, smooth to
rough, and have a range of synanamorphs. Readeriella mirabilis has a
synanamorph with cylindrical, aseptate conidia, while other species of
Readeriella again have Cibiessia synanamorphs
(scytalidium-like, with chains of dry, disarticulating conidia), suggesting
the conidial morphology to be quite plastic. A re-examination of R.
readeriellophora Crous & Mansilla revealed pycnidia to form a central
cushion on which the conidiogenous cells are arranged
(Fig. 18). This unique feature
is commonly known in genera such as Coniella Höhn. and
Pilidiella Petr. & Syd. (Diaporthales)
(Van Niekerk ), and has never been observed among anamorphs of the
Capnodiales. Another species of Readeriella, namely
“Phaeophleospora” toledana Crous & Bills,
again forms paraphyses interspersed among conidiogenous cells, a rare feature
in this group of fungi, while several species have conidiomata ranging from
acervuli to pycnidia (Cortinas ). Phylogenetically this coelomycete morphology, with
its characteristic conidiogenesis, has evolved several times in
Teratosphaeriaceae.Penidiella venezuelensis (type material). A. Microconidiophore. B.
Apical part of macroconidiophore. C-F. Chains of conidia. Scale bars = 10
μm.Penidiella venezuelensis (type material). A. Hypha. B.
Micronematous conidiophores. C. Macronematous conidiophores. D-E. Ramoconidia.
F. Secondary conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm. U. Braun del.(Crous & Summerell) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504516.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis blakelyi Crous &
Summerell, Fungal Diversity 23: 342. 2006.Crous & Summerell, sp.
nov. MycoBank
MB504517.
Fig. 19.Etymology: Named after the diffuse brown pigment visible in agar
when cultivated on MEA.Readeriellae gauchensi similis, sed coloniis viridi-atris et
pigmento brunneo in agaro diffundente distinguenda.Leaf spots amphigenous, irregular specks up to 3 mm diam, medium
brown with a thin, raised, concolorous border. Conidiomata
amphigenous, substomatal, exuding conidia in black masses; conidiomata
pycnidial in vivo and in vitro, globose, brown to black, up
to 120 μm diam; wall consisting of 3-4 cell layers of brown cells of
textura angularis. Conidiogenous cells brown, verruculose, aseptate,
doliiform to ampulliform, or reduced to inconspicuous loci on hyphae (in
vitro), proliferating percurrently near the apex, 5-7 × 3-5 μm;
sympodial proliferation also observed in culture. Conidia brown,
smooth to finely verruculose, ellipsoidal to subcylindrical, apex obtuse to
subobtuse, tapering to a subtruncate or truncate base (1-1.5 μm wide) with
inconspicuous, minute marginal frill, (5-)6-7(-8) × 2-3(-3.5) μm
in vitro, becoming 1-septate; in older cultures becoming swollen, and
up to 2-septate, 15 μm long and 5 μm wide.Cultural characteristics: Colonies on MEA reaching 20 mm
diam after 2 mo at 25 °C; colonies erumpent, aerial mycelium sparse to
absent, margins smooth but irregularly lobate; surface irregularly folded,
greenish black, with profuse sporulation, visible as oozing black conidial
masses; a diffuse dark-brown pigment is also produced, resulting in inoculated
MEA plates appearing dark-brown.Specimen examined: Australia, Queensland, Cairns, Eureka
Creek, 48 km from Mareeba, S 17° 11' 13.2”, E 145° 02'
27.4”, 468 m, on leaves of Eucalyptus tereticornis, 26 Aug.
2006, P.W. Crous, CBS-H
19838 holotype, culture ex-type CPC 13303 =
CBS 120747.Notes: Conidial dimensions of R. brunneotingens closely
match those of Readeriella gauchensis (M.-N. Cortinas, Crous &
M.J. Wingf.) Crous (Cortinas ). The two species can be distinguished in culture,
however, in that colonies of R. brunneotingens are greenish black in
colour, sporulate profusely, and exude a diffuse, brown pigment into the agar,
whereas colonies of R. gauchensis are more greenish olivaceous, and
exude a yellow pigment into the agar
(Cortinas ).(Crous & Summerell) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504518.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis considenianae Crous &
Summerell, Fungal Diversity 23: 343. 2006.(M.J. Wingf. & Crous) Crous
& U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504519.Basionym: Kirramyces destructans M.J. Wingf. & Crous,
S. African J. Bot. 62: 325. 1996.≡ Phaeophleospora destructans (M.J. Wingf. & Crous)
Crous, F.A. Ferreira & B. Sutton, S. African J. Bot. 63: 113. 1997.(Crous & Carnegie) Crous & U.
Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504520.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis dimorpha Crous & Carnegie,
Fungal Diversity 23: 345. 2006.(M.-N. Cortinas, Crous & M.J.
Wingf.) Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504521.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis gauchensis M.-N. Cortinas,
Crous & M.J. Wingf., Stud. Mycol. 55: 143. 2006.(Gadgil & M. Dick) Crous &
U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504522.Basionym: Septoria pulcherrima Gadgil & M. Dick, New
Zealand J. Bot. 21: 49. 1983.≡ Stagonospora pulcherrima (Gadgil & M. Dick) H.J.
Swart, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 90: 285. 1988.= Cercospora eucalypti Cooke & Massee, Grevillea 18:
7. 1889.≡ Kirramyces eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) J. Walker, B.
Sutton & Pascoe, Mycol. Res. 96: 920. 1992.≡ Phaeophleospora eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) Crous, F.A.
Ferreira & B. Sutton, S. African J. Bot. 63: 113. 1997.Notes: The epithet “eucalypti” is preoccupied
by Readeriella eucalypti (Gonz. Frag.) Crous
(Summerell ), and thus the synonym “pulcherrima”
becomes the next available name for this species.Readeriella readeriellophora, see . Fig.
18.(Crous) Crous & U. Braun,
comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504523.Basionym: Colletogloeopsis stellenboschiana Crous, Stud.
Mycol. 55: 110. 2006.(M.J. Wingf., Crous & T.A. Cout.)
Crous & U. Braun, comb. nov. MycoBank
MB504524.Basionym: Coniothyrium zuluense M.J. Wingf., Crous &
T.A. Cout., Mycopathologia 136: 142. 1997.≡ Colletogloeopsis zuluensis (M.J. Wingf., Crous & T.A.
Cout.) M.-N. Cortinas, M.J. Wingf. & Crous (zuluense), Mycol.
Res. 110: 235. 2006.B. Sutton, Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 57: 540.
1971.Type species: Staninwardia breviuscula B. Sutton, Trans.
Br. Mycol. Soc. 57: 540. 1971.Description: Sutton
(1971;
fig. 1).Notes: The genus Staninwardia presently contains two
species, namely S. breviuscula and Staninwardia suttonii
Crous & Summerell (Summerell ), though its placement in Capnodiales was
less well resolved. The genus forms acervuli on brown leaf spots, with brown,
catenulate conidia covered in a mucilaginous sheath.
Schizothyriaceae clade
Desm., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér.
3:11. 1849.Type species: Schizothyrium acerinum Desm., Ann. Sci.
Nat., Bot., sér. 3:11. 1849.Description: Batzer et al.
(2007; figs
3-7).Notes: Species of Schizothyrium
(Schizothyriaceae) have Zygophiala E.W. Mason anamorphs, and
were recently shown to be allied to Mycosphaerellaceae
(Batzer ).
Although species of Schizothyrium have thyrothecia, they cluster
among genera with pseudothecial ascomata, questioning the value of this
character at the family level. Based on its bitunicate asci and 1-septate
ascospores, the teleomorph is comparable to others in the
Capnodiales.A-E. Readeriella mirabilis. A. Conidium with conidial cirrus. B.
Conidiogenous cells with percurrent proliferation. C. Macroconidia. D.
Slightly pigmented, verruculose conidiogenous cell. E. Macro- and
microconidia. F-I. Readeriella readeriellophora (type material). F.
Colony on OA. G. Central stromatal tissue giving rise to conidiophores. H.
Conidiogenous cells. I. Conidia. Scale bars = 10 μm.Readeriella brunneotingens (type material). A. Leaf spot. B.
Colony on MEA. C-D. Conidia. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Mycosphaerellaceae clade
Mycosphaerella subclade
Johanson, Öfvers. Förh. Kongl.
Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. 41(9): 163. 1884.Type species: Mycosphaerella punctiformis (Pers.: Fr.)
Starbäck, Bih. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 15(3, 2): 9.
1889.Anamorph: Ramularia endophylla Verkley & U. Braun,
Mycol. Res. 108: 1276. 2004.Description: Verkley et al.
(2004; figs
3-16).Notes: The genus Mycosphaerella has in the past been
linked to 23 anamorph genera (Crous ), while additional genera have been linked via
DNA-based studies, bringing the total to at least 30 genera
(Crous & Braun 2003,
Crous ).
However, based on ITS and SSU DNA phylogenetic studies and a reassessment of
morphological characters and conidiogenesis, several anamorph genera have
recently been reduced to synonymy (Crous
& Braun 2003, Crous ). Furthermore, the DNA sequence data generated to
date clearly illustrate that the anamorph genera in Mycosphaerella
are polyphyletic, residing in several clades within Mycosphaerella.
If future collections not known from culture or DNA sequences are to be
described in form genera, we recommend that the concepts as explained in Crous
& Braun (2003) be used
until such stage as they can be placed in Mycosphaerella, pending a
modification of Art. 59 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature.
The genus Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs represent a future topical
issue of the Studies in Mycology, and will thus be treated
separately.
Dissoconium subclade
de Hoog, Oorschot & Hijwegen, Proc. K. Ned.
Akad. Wet., Ser. C, Biol. Med. Sci. 86(2): 198. 1983.Type species: Dissoconium aciculare de Hoog, Oorschot
& Hijwegen, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet., Ser. C, Biol. Med. Sci. 86(2): 198.
1983.? = Uwebraunia Crous & M.J. Wingf., Mycologia 88: 446.
1996.Teleomorph: Mycosphaerella-like.Description: de Hoog et al.
(1983), Crous
(1998), Crous et al.
(2004b; figs
3-10).Notes: The genus Dissoconium presently encompasses six
species (Crous ), of which two, M. lateralis Crous & M.J.
Wingf. (D. dekkeri de Hoog & Hijwegen), and M. communis
Crous & Mansilla (D. commune Crous & Mansilla) are also known
from their Mycosphaerella-like teleomorphs. No teleomorph genus will
be introduced for this clade, however, until more sexual species have been
collected to help clarify the morphological features of this genus. A further
complication lies in the fact that yet other species, morphologically distinct
from Dissoconium, also cluster in this clade (Crous, unpubl.
data).
“Passalora” zambiae subclade
Crous & T.A. Cout.,
Stud. Mycol. 50: 209. 2004.Description: Crous et al.
(2004b; figs 32-33).Notes: This fungus was placed in the form genus
“Passalora” based on its smooth mycelium, giving rise to
conidiophores forming branched chains of brown conidia with thickened,
darkened, refractive hila. Although derived from single ascospores, the
teleomorph material was lost, and thus it needs to be recollected before the
relavance of its phylogenetic position can be fully understood.
Additional teleomorph genera considered
A. Massal., Atti Inst. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti,
Série 2, 5: 336. 1860. (Fig.
20).
Fig. 20.
Coccodinium bartschii. A. Ascomata on host. B. Ostiolar area. C.
Periphysoids. D-E. Ascospores shot onto agar. F-I. Asci with thick ectotunica.
J-K. Young ascospores. L-M. Mature ascospores. N. Colony on MEA. O-Q.
Conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. R-S. Conidia. Scale bars: A, N =
250, B, D, F-G, I, L-M, O = 10 μm.
Type species: Coccodinium bartschii A. Massal., Atti
Inst. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti, Série 2, 5: 337. 1860.Description: Eriksson
(1981, figs 34-35).Notes: The genus Coccodinium (Coccodiniaceae) is
characterised by having ascomata that are sessile on a subiculum, or somewhat
immersed, semiglobose, collapsed when dry, brownish, uniloculate, with a
centrum that stains blue in IKI (iodine potassium iodide). Asci are
bitunicate, stalked, 8-spored, saccate, and have a thick, undifferentiated
endotunica. Periphyses and periphysoids are well-developed
and numerous. Ascospores are elongate, fusiform, ellipsoidal or
clavate, transversely septate or muriform, hyaline or brownish
(Eriksson 1981), and lack a
mucous sheath. Based on a SSU sequence (GenBank accession U77668) derived from
a strain identified as C. bartschii
(Winka ),
Coccodinium appears to be allied to the taxa treated here in
Teratosphaeria. Freshly collected cultures are relatively slow
growing, and on MEA they form erumpent round, black colonies with sparse
hyphal growth. On the surface of these colonies hyphal strands, consisting of
brown, globose cells, give rise to conidia. Older cells (up to 15 μm diam)
become fertile, giving rise to 1-3 conidia via inconspicuous phialidic loci.
Conidia are fusoid-ellipsoidal to clavate, 3-5-septate, becoming constricted
at the transverse septa, apex obtuse, base subtruncate, guttulate, smooth,
widest in the upper third of the conidium, 15-40 × 4-7 μm.
Phylogenetically Coccodinium is thus allied to the
Chaetothyriales (Fig.
1), and not the Teratosphaeriaceae.Trevis., Consp. Verruc.: 17. 1860.
(Fig. 21).
Fig. 21.
Stigmidium schaereri. A. Lichenicolous habit on Dacampia
hookeri. B. Vertical section through an ascoma. C-D. Asci. E-G.
Ascospores. H. Older, brown ascospores. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Coccodinium bartschii. A. Ascomata on host. B. Ostiolar area. C.
Periphysoids. D-E. Ascospores shot onto agar. F-I. Asci with thick ectotunica.
J-K. Young ascospores. L-M. Mature ascospores. N. Colony on MEA. O-Q.
Conidiogenous cells giving rise to conidia. R-S. Conidia. Scale bars: A, N =
250, B, D, F-G, I, L-M, O = 10 μm.Stigmidium schaereri. A. Lichenicolous habit on Dacampia
hookeri. B. Vertical section through an ascoma. C-D. Asci. E-G.
Ascospores. H. Older, brown ascospores. Scale bars = 10 μm.Type species: Stigmidium schaereri (A. Massal.) Trevis., Consp.
Verruc.: 17. 1860.Description: Roux & Triebel
(1994, figs 47-50).Notes: The type species of the genus is lichenicolous,
characterised by semi-immersed, black, globose ascomata with ostiolar
periphyses and periphysoids. Asci are 8-spored, fasciculate,
bitunicate, (endotunica not giving a special reaction in Congo red or
toluidine blue). Ascospores are fusoid-ellipsoidal, medianly
1-septate, guttulate, thin-walled, lacking a sheath. Presently no culture is
available, and thus the placement of Stigmidium remains
unresolved.
DISCUSSION
From the LSU sequence data presented here, it is clear that
Mycosphaerella is not monophyletic as previously suggested
(Crous ,
Goodwin ).
The first step to circumscribe natural genera within this complex was taken by
Braun et al. (2003),
who separated Cladosporium anamorphs from this complex, and erected
Davidiella (Davidiellaceae;
Schoch )
to accommodate their teleomorphs. The present study reinstates the genus
Teratosphaeria for a clade of largely extremotolerant fungi
(Selbmann ) and foliar pathogens of Myrtaceae and
Proteaceae (Crous , b,
2006b,
2007b), and further separates
generic subclades within the Mycosphaerellaceae, while Batzer et
al. (2007) again revealed
Schizothyrium Desm. (Schizothyriaceae) to cluster within the
Mycosphaerellaceae. Our results, however, provide support for
recognition of Schizothyrium as a distinct genus, although
Schizothyriaceae was less well supported as being separate from
Mycosphaerellaceae (Capnodiales).Although pleomorphism represents a rather unstudied phenomenon in this
group of fungi, it has been observed in several species. Within the
Teratosphaeria clade, Crous et al.
(2007b) recently demonstrated
teleomorphs to have Readeriella and Cibiessia synanamorphs,
while the black yeast genera that belong to this clade, commonly have more
than one anamorph state in culture. The present study also revealed
Readeriella mirabilis to have two conidial types in culture, and to
be highly plastic regarding its mode of conidiogenesis, and
Readeriella to be the oldest generic name available for a large group
of leaf-spotting coelomycetes in the Teratosphaeriaceae
(Capnodiales).Although not commonly documented, there are ample examples of synanamorphs
in Capnodiales. Within Mycosphaerella, Beilharz et
al. (2004) described
Passalora perplexa Beilharz, Pascoe, M.J. Wingf. & Crous as a
species with a coelomycete and yeast synanamorph, while Crous & Corlett
(1998) described
Mycosphaerella stigmina-platani F.A. Wolf to have a
Cercostigmina U. Braun and Xenostigmina Crous synanamorph,
and recent collections also revealed the presence of a similar species that
has typical “Stigmina” (distoseptate conidia) and
Pseudocercospora (euseptate conidia) synanamorphs (Crous, unpubl.
data), and Crous (1998)
reported Readeriella epicoccoides (coelomycete) to have a
Cercostigmina (hyphomycete) synanamorph in culture.Although the Mycosphaerella complex encompasses thousands of
names, it may appear strange that it is only now that more clarity is obtained
regarding the phylogenetic relationships among taxa in this group. This is
partly due to the fact that these organisms are cultivated with difficulty,
and also that the first paper to address the taxonomy of this complex based on
DNA sequence data was only relatively recently published
(Stewart ). In the latter study, the genus Paracercospora
Deighton (scars minutely thickened along the rim), was shown to be synonymous
with the older genus Pseudocercospora. Similarily, Crous et
al. (2001) showed that
Cercostigmina (rough, irregular percurrent proliferations) was also
synonymous with Pseudocercospora. This led Crous & Braun
(2003) to conclude that
conidiomatal type, conidial catenulation, septation and proliferation of
conidiogenous cells were of less importance in separating species at the
generic level. Mycovellosiella Rangel and Phaeoramularia
Munt.-Cvetk. were subsequently reduced to synonymy with the older name,
Passalora Fr., and characters identified as significant at the
generic level were pigmentation (Cercospora vs. Passalora), scar
structure (Passalora vs. Pseudocercospora), and verruculose
superficial hyphae (Stenella vs. Passalora). Due to the
unavailability of cultures, no decision was made regarding Stenella
(verrucose conidia and mycelium), Stigmina (distoseptate conidia),
and several other, less well-known genera such as Asperisporium
Maubl., Denticularia Deighton, Distocercospora N. Pons &
B. Sutton, Prathigada Subram., Ramulispora,
Pseudocercosporidium Deighton, Stenellopsis B. Huguenin and
Verrucisporota D.E. Shaw & Alcorn. In a recent study, however,
Crous et al. (2006a)
were able to show that Phaeoisariopsis (synnemata, conidia with
slightly thickened hila) and Stigmina (distoseptate conidia) were
also synonyms of Pseudocercospora.The present study shows that most anamorph genera are polyphyletic within
Teratosphaeria, and paraphyletic within Capnodiales. In some
cases, generic concepts of anamorphs based on morphology and conidium ontogeny
conform well with phylogenetic relationships, though this is not true in all
cases due to convergence. Nevertheless, anamorphs still convey valuable
morphological information that is contained in the anamorph name, and naming
anamorphs continue to provide a practical system to identify the various
asexual taxa encountered.
Authors: K Schubert; J Z Groenewald; U Braun; J Dijksterhuis; M Starink; C F Hill; P Zalar; G S de Hoog; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Jan M Van Niekerk; J Z Ewald Groenewald; Gerard J M Verkley; Paul H Fourie; Michael J Wingfield; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mycol Res Date: 2004-03
Authors: Pedro W Crous; Bernard Slippers; Michael J Wingfield; John Rheeder; Walter F O Marasas; Alan J L Philips; Artur Alves; Treena Burgess; Paul Barber; Johannes Z Groenewald Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: Michael J Wingfield; Z Wilhelm De Beer; Bernard Slippers; Brenda D Wingfield; Johannes Z Groenewald; Lorenzo Lombard; Pedro W Crous Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: K Bensch; J Z Groenewald; J Dijksterhuis; M Starink-Willemse; B Andersen; B A Summerell; H-D Shin; F M Dugan; H-J Schroers; U Braun; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; R G Shivas; W Quaedvlieg; M van der Bank; Y Zhang; B A Summerell; J Guarro; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; A C Alfenas; U Braun; J F Cano-Lira; D García; Y Marin-Felix; P Alvarado; J P Andrade; J Armengol; A Assefa; A den Breeÿen; I Camele; R Cheewangkoon; J T De Souza; T A Duong; F Esteve-Raventós; J Fournier; S Frisullo; J García-Jiménez; A Gardiennet; J Gené; M Hernández-Restrepo; Y Hirooka; D R Hospenthal; A King; C Lechat; L Lombard; S M Mang; P A S Marbach; S Marincowitz; Y Marin-Felix; N J Montaño-Mata; G Moreno; C A Perez; A M Pérez Sierra; J L Robertson; J Roux; E Rubio; R K Schumacher; A M Stchigel; D A Sutton; Y P Tan; E H Thompson; E van der Linde; A K Walker; D M Walker; B L Wickes; P T W Wong; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: K Bensch; J Z Groenewald; U Braun; J Dijksterhuis; M de Jesús Yáñez-Morales; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 16.097
Authors: P W Crous; U Braun; M J Wingfield; A R Wood; H D Shin; B A Summerell; A C Alfenas; C J R Cumagun; J Z Groenewald Journal: Persoonia Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 11.051
Authors: L Selbmann; G S de Hoog; L Zucconi; D Isola; S Ruisi; A H G Gerrits van den Ende; C Ruibal; F De Leo; C Urzì; S Onofri Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 16.097