Literature DB >> 29618849

CAMx Ozone Source Attribution in the Eastern United States using Guidance from Observations during DISCOVER-AQ Maryland.

Daniel L Goldberg1, Timothy P Vinciguerra2, Daniel C Anderson1, Linda Hembeck1, Timothy P Canty1, Sheryl H Ehrman2, Douglas K Martins3, Ryan M Stauffer3,4, Anne M Thompson3,5, Ross J Salawitch1,4,6, Russell R Dickerson1,4,6.   

Abstract

A Comprehensive Air-Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) version 6.10 simulation was assessed through comparison with data acquired during NASA's 2011 DISCOVER-AQ Maryland field campaign. Comparisons for the baseline simulation (CB05 chemistry, EPA 2011 National Emissions Inventory) show a model overestimate of NOy by +86.2% and an underestimate of HCHO by -28.3%. We present a new model framework (CB6r2 chemistry, MEGAN v2.1 biogenic emissions, 50% reduction in mobile NOx, enhanced representation of isoprene nitrates) that better matches observations. The new model framework attributes 31.4% more surface ozone in Maryland to electric generating units (EGUs) and 34.6% less ozone to on-road mobile sources. Surface ozone becomes more NOx-limited throughout the eastern United States compared to the baseline simulation. The baseline model therefore likely underestimates the effectiveness of anthropogenic NOx reductions as well as the current contribution of EGUs to surface ozone.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29618849      PMCID: PMC5880053          DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geophys Res Lett        ISSN: 0094-8276            Impact factor:   4.720


  5 in total

1.  Ozone-precursor relationships from EKMA diagrams.

Authors:  J R Kinosian
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  An observational perspective on the atmospheric impacts of alkyl and multifunctional nitrates on ozone and secondary organic aerosol.

Authors:  A E Perring; S E Pusede; R C Cohen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Photochemical modeling of the Ozark isoprene volcano: MEGAN, BEIS, and their impacts on air quality predictions.

Authors:  Annmarie G Carlton; Kirk R Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Comparison of the MOVES2010a, MOBILE6.2, and EMFAC2007 mobile source emission models with on-road traffic tunnel and remote sensing measurements.

Authors:  Eric M Fujita; David E Campbell; Barbara Zielinska; Judith C Chow; Christian E Lindhjem; Allison DenBleyker; Gary A Bishop; Brent G Schuchmann; Donald H Stedman; Douglas R Lawson
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Ozone profiles in the Baltimore-Washington region (2006-2011): satellite comparisons and DISCOVER-AQ observations.

Authors:  Anne M Thompson; Ryan M Stauffer; Sonya K Miller; Douglas K Martins; Everette Joseph; Andrew J Weinheimer; Glenn S Diskin
Journal:  J Atmos Chem       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.158

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  An assessment of important SPECIATE profiles in the EPA emissions modeling platform and current data gaps.

Authors:  Casey D Bray; Madeleine Strum; Heather Simon; Lee Riddick; Mike Kosusko; Marc Menetrez; Michael D Hays; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Anomalous behaviour of ozone under COVID-19 and explicit diagnosis of O3-NOx-VOCs mechanism.

Authors:  A Rathod; S K Sahu; S Singh; G Beig
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Characterizing CO and NO y Sources and Relative Ambient Ratios in the Baltimore Area Using Ambient Measurements and Source Attribution Modeling.

Authors:  Heather Simon; Luke C Valin; Kirk R Baker; Barron H Henderson; James H Crawford; Sally E Pusede; James T Kelly; Kristen M Foley; R Chris Owen; Ronald C Cohen; Brian Timin; Andrew J Weinheimer; Norm Possiel; Chris Misenis; Glenn S Diskin; Alan Fried
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.217

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.