Literature DB >> 21505611

Survey respondents planning to have screening colonoscopy report unique barriers.

Jennifer Vincent, Angela K Hochhalter, Kristine Broglio, Andrejs E Avots-Avotins.   

Abstract

Tailoring colorectal cancer screening interventions to address the needs of individuals for whom screening is recommended requires accurate identification of the barriers experienced by each targeted group. The primary purpose of this survey study was to test differences in the barriers to undergoing screening colonoscopy reported by men and women. In addition, we were interested in differences in barriers reported by 1) 50-year-olds versus those age 51 to 80 years, 2) persons reporting readiness for colonoscopy versus those not reporting readiness, and 3) persons who had had a primary care encounter in the preceding 12 months versus those who had not. Four thousand members of a health maintenance organization (Scott & White Health Plan) were surveyed. Response rate overall was 30.85%. No differences in barriers to screening colonoscopy were identified for men versus women. We did identify differences in barriers reported by persons reporting readiness versus those not reporting readiness. Findings suggest that interventions to increase rates of screening colonoscopy require addressing different sets of barriers depending on whether persons report readiness to have a colonoscopy within 6 months.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21505611      PMCID: PMC3048632          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/10-089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  15 in total

1.  Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  R Bastani; A E Maxwell; C Bradford; I P Das; K X Yan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; W F Velicer
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

3.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

5.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Increase in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Mary C White; Lucy A Peipins; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Are gender differences in colorectal cancer screening rates due to differences in self-reporting?

Authors:  Joan M Griffin; Diana Burgess; Sally W Vernon; Greta Friedemann-Sanchez; Adam Powell; Michelle van Ryn; Krysten Halek; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joe Grill; Hanna Bloomfield; Melissa Partin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults.

Authors:  Zahava Berkowitz; Nikki A Hawkins; Lucy A Peipins; Mary C White; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa DiCarlo; Ronald E Myers; Thomas Wolf; James Cocroft; Randa Sifri; Michael Rosenthal; Sally W Vernon; Richard Wender
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  5 in total

1.  A population-based study of prevalence and adherence trends in average risk colorectal cancer screening, 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Ellen L Goode; Paul J Limburg; Sally W Vernon; Joseph B Wick; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Andrew C Hanson; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Frank A Sinicrope; Noralane M Lindor; Tabetha A Brockman; L Joseph Melton; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy Among Persons in HIV Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pansy Ferron; Shihab S Asfour; Lisa R Metsch; Michael H Antoni; Allan E Rodriguez; Robert Duncan; Sheila M Findlay
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Correlates of initiating colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 50.

Authors:  Karon L Phillips; Matthew Lee Smith; SangNam Ahn; Marcia G Ory; Angie K Hochhalter
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-02

4.  Glaucarubinone and gemcitabine synergistically reduce pancreatic cancer growth via down-regulation of P21-activated kinases.

Authors:  Dannel Yeo; Nhi Huynh; John A Beutler; Christopher Christophi; Arthur Shulkes; Graham S Baldwin; Mehrdad Nikfarjam; Hong He
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  What Do Men Want from a Health Screening Mobile App? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Alan White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.