Literature DB >> 19765609

Are gender differences in colorectal cancer screening rates due to differences in self-reporting?

Joan M Griffin1, Diana Burgess, Sally W Vernon, Greta Friedemann-Sanchez, Adam Powell, Michelle van Ryn, Krysten Halek, Siamak Noorbaloochi, Joe Grill, Hanna Bloomfield, Melissa Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies have found that women are less likely than men to undergo colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. While one source of these disparities may be gender differences in barriers and facilitators to screening, another may be differences in reporting bias.
METHOD: In this study of 345 male and female veterans, conducted in 2006 in Minneapolis, MN, we examined CRC screening adherence rates by gender using medical records and self-report and assessed whether any differences were due to reporting bias.
RESULTS: We found a significantly higher rate of colonoscopy use among men when using self-report data, but no significant differences in either overall or test-specific screening adherence when using medical record data. Analyses examining the prevalence and determinants of concordance between self-report and medical records screening revealed that compared to women, men were less accurate in reporting sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy and over-reported screening by colonoscopy. Men were also more likely to have missing self-report data and how missing data were handled affected differences in screening behavior. Accuracy in screening behavior was not explained by demographic variables, good physical or mental health, or physician recommendation for screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Reported gender disparities in CRC screening adherence may be a result of reporting bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19765609     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

1.  A population-based study of prevalence and adherence trends in average risk colorectal cancer screening, 1997 to 2008.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Ellen L Goode; Paul J Limburg; Sally W Vernon; Joseph B Wick; Christi A Patten; Paul A Decker; Andrew C Hanson; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Frank A Sinicrope; Noralane M Lindor; Tabetha A Brockman; L Joseph Melton; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin R Oldach; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-10-14

4.  Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ryan E Childers; J Lucas Williams; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Population Colorectal Cancer Screening Estimates: Comparing Self-Report to Electronic Health Record Data in California.

Authors:  Latha P Palaniappan; Annette E Maxwell; Catherine M Crespi; Eric C Wong; Jessica Shin; Elsie J Wang
Journal:  Int J Canc Prev       Date:  2011

6.  Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Catherine E Mosher; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2013-06-27

7.  Survey respondents planning to have screening colonoscopy report unique barriers.

Authors:  Jennifer Vincent; Angela K Hochhalter; Kristine Broglio; Andrejs E Avots-Avotins
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2011

Review 8.  An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Research Literature (2008-2015).

Authors:  Elisheva R Danan; Erin E Krebs; Kristine Ensrud; Eva Koeller; Roderick MacDonald; Tina Velasquez; Nancy Greer; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Quality indicators to assess a colorectal cancer prevention program.

Authors:  Victoria Serra-Sutton; Carmela Barrantes Serrano; Mireia Espallargues Carreras
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.188

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.