Literature DB >> 10564627

Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer.

R Bastani1, A E Maxwell, C Bradford, I P Das, K X Yan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that although first-degree relatives of breast cancer cases are at increased risk of developing the disease themselves, they may be underutilizing screening mammography. Therefore, interventions to increase the use of mammography in this group are urgently needed.
METHODS: A randomized two-group design was used to evaluate an intervention to increase mammography use among women (N = 901) with at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer. A statewide cancer registry was used to obtain a random sample of breast cancer cases who identified eligible relatives. The mailed intervention consisted of personalized risk notification and other theoretically driven materials tailored for high-risk women.
RESULTS: An overall significant intervention effect was observed (8% intervention group advantage) in mammography at post-test. There was an interaction of the intervention with age such that there was no effect among women <50 years of age and a fairly large (20% advantage) effect among women 50+ and 65+. Health insurance, education, and having had a mammogram in the year before baseline assessment were positive predictors of mammography at post-test. Perceived risk, calculated risk, and relationship to index cancer case were not associated with mammography receipt.
CONCLUSION: The intervention was successful in increasing mammography rates among high-risk women 50+ years of age. Further work is needed to determine why it was ineffective among younger women. Copyright 1999 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10564627     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  37 in total

Review 1.  Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Silvana Unigwe; Glyn Elwyn; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

2.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

3.  Results of a randomized trial to increase mammogram usage among Samoan women.

Authors:  Shiraz I Mishra; Roshan Bastani; Catherine M Crespi; L Cindy Chang; Pat H Luce; Claudia R Baquet
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Appalachian women's perspectives on breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Tina M Kruger; Shoshana Bardach; Britteny M Howell
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The Health Behavior Framework.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; Beth A Glenn; Vicky M Taylor; Moon S Chen; Tung T Nguyen; Susan L Stewart; Annette E Maxwell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Alternative approaches to assessing intervention effectiveness in randomized trials: application in a colorectal cancer screening study.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Catherine M Crespi; Leda L Danao; Cynthia Antonio; Gabriel M Garcia; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Colorectal cancer screening among underserved Korean Americans in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Angela M Jo; Annette E Maxwell; Weng K Wong; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2008-04

Review 8.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

9.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Constructing a theoretically based set of measures for liver cancer control research studies.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Roshan Bastani; Moon S Chen; Tung T Nguyen; Susan L Stewart; Vicky M Taylor
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.