Literature DB >> 21503623

Modified veneer bone graft with the concomitant installation of a dental implant: technical note.

Seong-Gon Kim1, Ji-Young Song, Yong-Chan Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alveolar bone is usually resorbed after the loss of a tooth. As the buccal bony plate of the alveolar bone is thin compared to the palatal or the lingual bony plate, the bone resorption rate is higher on the buccal side. If a patient is partially edentulous, vertical bone resorption is restricted by the adjacent teeth. In such a case, the residual alveolar ridge becomes thin and narrow. As a result, a veneer graft is required. CASE REPORT: Two patients received a total of two implants with a modified technique. The modified technique is described in which the implant hole is made in both the mandibular ramus and the recipient site. Autogenous bone was taken from the mandibular ramus as a partial-thickness graft. The grafted bone was adapted to an installed dental implant and used as a veneer graft. There were no cases that showed the fixture exposure during the follow-up periods. Numbness was not reported after the operation in any of the cases. Additionally, osseointegration failures did not occur during the follow-up periods.
CONCLUSION: Our technique has been shown high success rates and is reproducible for a veneer bone graft with concomitant implant installation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21503623     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-011-0271-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  17 in total

1.  Simultaneous or delayed placement of titanium implants in free autogenous iliac bone grafts. Histological analysis of the bone graft-titanium interface in 10 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S Lundgren; L Rasmusson; M Sjöström; L Sennerby
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membranes and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants: an experimental pilot study in dogs.

Authors:  H Schliephake; M Dard; H Planck; H Hierlemann; U Stern
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Clinical, histological and histomorphometric evaluation of the healing of mandibular ramus bone block grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation before implant placement.

Authors:  Alessandro Acocella; Roberto Bertolai; Maurizio Colafranceschi; Roberto Sacco
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Partial-thickness cortical bone graft from the mandibular ramus: a non-invasive harvesting technique.

Authors:  Kyung-Gyun Hwang; Kwang-Sup Shim; Seung-Min Yang; Chang-Joo Park
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Distance between external cortical bone and mandibular canal for harvesting ramus graft: a human cadaver study.

Authors:  Daylene Jack-Min Leong; Jingjing Li; Ildefonso Moreno; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 6.  Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the use of autogenous bone.

Authors:  M S Block; J N Kent
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  The anatomical location of the mandibular canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  J Rajchel; E Ellis; R J Fonseca
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1986

8.  Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Martin Radespiel-Tröger; Jörg Wiltfang; Stefan Schultze-Mosgau; Gerhard Winkler; Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  The potential of the horizontal ramus of the mandible as a donor site for block and particular grafts in pre-implant surgery.

Authors:  A Soehardi; G J Meijer; V F M H Strooband; M de Koning; P J W Stoelinga
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications.

Authors:  Jaime Clavero; Stefan Lundgren
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.