Literature DB >> 12453129

Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study.

Emeka Nkenke1, Martin Radespiel-Tröger, Jörg Wiltfang, Stefan Schultze-Mosgau, Gerhard Winkler, Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam.   

Abstract

20 retromolar bone grafts were harvested in outpatients for augmentation of the implant site from January to June 2000 (10 female, 10 male, 40.9 +/- 12.8 years, minimum 17 years, maximum 66 years). The aim of the study was to assess typical complications of this procedure in a prospective manner. For the determination of the superficial sensory function of the inferior alveolar and the lingual nerve, an objective method was used. The bone grafts were harvested for single tooth reconstruction. In 14 cases a ridge augmentation and in 6 cases an endoscopically controlled crestal sinus floor elevation was performed. Preoperatively, the height of bone above the cranial aspect of the inferior alveolar nerve in the retromolar region was assessed radiologically with known markers. The maximum mouth opening was determined. The superficial sensory function of the inferior alveolar and the lingual nerve was assessed with the Pointed-Blunt Test, the Two-Point-Discrimination Test and the objective method of the 'Pain and Thermal Sensitivity' Test (PATH Test). Moreover, the pulp sensitivity of the teeth of the donor site was determined by cold vitality testing. All tests were repeated 1 week postoperatively. Intraoperatively, the width of the retromolar region was measured with a caliper. The patients rated the operative strain on a visual analogue scale. The height of bone above the inferior alveolar nerve in the retromolar region was 11.0 +/- 2.2 mm. The width of the retromolar area was 14.2 +/- 1.9 mm. Postoperatively, the maximal mouth opening changed significantly (40.8 +/- 3.5 mm preoperatively, 38.9 +/- 3.7 mm postoperatively, P = 0.006). However, the reduction was not relevant clinically. A direct injury of the inferior alveolar or lingual nerve did not occur. A sensitivity impairment could not be detected for either of the nerves by the different test methods 1 week postoperatively. The operative strain related to the donor site was significantly less than the strain generated by the implant placement (rating on a visual analogue scale 2.8 +/- 1.0 and 4.1 +/- 2.0, respectively, P = 0.027). Retromolar bone grafts are a viable method for augmentation of the implant site in conjunction with single tooth reconstruction with low strain on the patient and minimal risk of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12453129     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  30 in total

1.  Closure of oroantral fistula using titanium plate with transalveolar wiring.

Authors:  Wael Mohamed Said Ahmed
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-09-26

Review 2.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

3.  Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in following simulated autogenous graft resorption in maxillary sinus augmentation procedure: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Sanja Umanjec-Korac; Azin Parsa; Aria Darvishan Nikoozad; Daniel Wismeijer; Bassam Hassan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  [Osseous defect regeneration using autogenous bone alone or combined with Biogran or Algipore with and without added thrombocytes. A microradiologic evaluation].

Authors:  K A Schlegel; F R Kloss; S Schultze-Mosgau; F W Neukam; J Wiltfang
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-02-14

5.  Comparison of three block bone substitutes for bone regeneration: long-term observation in the beagle dog.

Authors:  Kosaku Sawada; Ken Nakahara; Maiko Haga-Tsujimura; Tateyuki Iizuka; Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi; Kensuke Igarashi; Nikola Saulacic
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Comparison of morbidity and complications of harvesting bone from the iliac crest and calvarium: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Fawzi Riachi; Nada Naaman; Carine Tabarani; Antoine Berberi; Ziad Salameh
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

7.  Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study.

Authors:  Tim Fienitz; Ofer Moses; Christoph Klemm; Arndt Happe; Daniel Ferrari; Matthias Kreppel; Zeev Ormianer; Moti Gal; Daniel Rothamel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Surface- and nonsurface-dependent in vitro effects of bone substitutes on cell viability.

Authors:  M Herten; D Rothamel; F Schwarz; K Friesen; G Koegler; J Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute: an immunohistochemical study in the sheep.

Authors:  Steffen Koerdt; Oliver Ristow; Andreas Wannhoff; Alexander C Kübler; Tobias Reuther
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Polymeric vs hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds on dental pulp stem cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Arash Khojasteh; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Maryam Rezai Rad; Mehrnoosh Hasan Shahriari; Nasser Nadjmi
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 5.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.