Literature DB >> 14575631

Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications.

Jaime Clavero1, Stefan Lundgren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The placement of endosseous implants in edentulous areas is frequently limited by inadequate bone volume of the residual ridge. Local bone grafts from the mandible are a convenient source of autogenous bone for alveolar reconstruction prior to implant placement.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to document and compare the morbidity and the frequency of complications occurring at two intraoral donor sites: the mandibular symphysis and the mandibular ramus.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study reviewed 53 consecutively treated patients: 29 with autogenous bone grafts from the mandibular symphysis and 24 with mandibular ramus bone grafts. Each patient received a questionnaire 18 months after surgery regarding problems that may have occurred during the postoperative period.
RESULTS: In the patients in whom bone was harvested from the mandibular ramus, there were fewer postoperative symptoms immediately after the operation than with mandibular symphysis harvesting. Twenty-two of the 29 patients with symphysis grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the skin innervated by the mental nerve 1 month after the operation. Five of the 24 patients with ramus grafts experienced decreased sensitivity in the vestibular mucosa corresponding to the innervation of the buccal nerve. Eighteen months after the surgery, 15 of the 29 patients in the symphysis group still had some decreased sensitivity and presented with permanent altered sensation. Only one of the patients grafted from the mandibular ramus presented with permanent altered sensation in the posterior vestibular area. No major complication occurred in the donor sites in any of the 53 patients.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study favored the use of the ascending mandibular ramus as an intraoral donor site for bone grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575631     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  56 in total

Review 1.  Bone regeneration by stem cell and tissue engineering in oral and maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Lee; Yoon-Jin Lee; Seong-Ho Jin; Yoonji Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Youngkyung Ko; Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report.

Authors:  D Spinelli; L Ottria; G DE Vico; R Bollero; A Barlattani; P Bollero
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-10-15

4.  Immediate loading of four implants (BTLock(®)) in the maxilla and provisional restoration with guide-surgery (SimPlant, Materialise(®)): case report.

Authors:  D Spinelli; G DE Vico; R Schiavetti; M Bonino; A Pozzi; P Bollero; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-29

5.  The effect of Emdogain and platelet-derived growth factor on the osteoinductive potential of hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate.

Authors:  R C Chan; V Marino; P M Bartold
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model.

Authors:  D Joshua Cohen; Kayla M Scott; Aniket N Kulkarni; Jennifer S Wayne; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 7.  Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Eduardo Saiz; Elizabeth A Zimmermann; Janice S Lee; Ulrike G K Wegst; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Tailored sequential drug release from bilayered calcium sulfate composites.

Authors:  Bryan R Orellana; David A Puleo
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.328

9.  Eggshell derived hydroxyapatite as bone graft substitute in the healing of maxillary cystic bone defects: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Vivekanand S Kattimani; P Srinivas Chakravarthi; Narasimha Reddy Kanumuru; Vummidisetti V Subbarao; A Sidharthan; T S Sampath Kumar; L Krishna Prasad
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

10.  Surface- and nonsurface-dependent in vitro effects of bone substitutes on cell viability.

Authors:  M Herten; D Rothamel; F Schwarz; K Friesen; G Koegler; J Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.