Literature DB >> 20151802

Distance between external cortical bone and mandibular canal for harvesting ramus graft: a human cadaver study.

Daylene Jack-Min Leong1, Jingjing Li, Ildefonso Moreno, Hom-Lay Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to determine the distance of the external surface of the buccal cortical plate to the inferior alveolar canal in the mandibular molar region and to propose a safe thickness for harvesting a mandibular ramus block graft.
METHODS: Thirty-four cadavers consisting of 26 dentate jaws and eight jaws in the edentulous molar region were used in this study. All mandibular ramus grafts were harvested by one investigator with the grafts extending from the external oblique ridge (EOR) and 15 mm inferiorly in the apico-coronal direction and extending from the mid-buccal aspect of the first molar to the mid-buccal aspect of the third molar in the mesio-distal direction. Measurements were made of the cortical bone thickness of the harvested ramus graft and from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the EOR, the CEJ to the mandibular border, and the CEJ to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN).
RESULTS: The average buccal cortical plate thickness in dentate mandibles was 2.76 +/- 0.13 mm, whereas in edentulous posterior mandibles it was 2.52 +/- 0.32 mm. The IANs were exposed in all jaws but were intact.
CONCLUSION: The safe thickness to harvest ramus grafts was determined to be 2.5 to 3.0 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20151802     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  3 in total

Review 1.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 2. Clinical strategies.

Authors:  S S Virdee; S Bhakta; D Seymour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Modified veneer bone graft with the concomitant installation of a dental implant: technical note.

Authors:  Seong-Gon Kim; Ji-Young Song; Yong-Chan Lee
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-04-19

3.  Comparison of the Bone Harvesting Capacity of an Intraoral Bone Harvesting Device and Three Different Implant Drills.

Authors:  Hyun-Chang Lim; Kyung-In Ha; Ji-Youn Hong; Ji-Young Han; Seung-Il Shin; Seung-Yun Shin; Yeek Herr; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.