Literature DB >> 21502292

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects.

N Roche1, A Lackmy, V Achache, B Bussel, R Katz.   

Abstract

In recent years, two techniques have become available for the non-invasive stimulation of human motor cortex: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The effects of TMS and tDCS when applied over motor cortex should be considered with regard not only to cortical circuits but also to spinal motor circuits. The different modes of action and specificity of TMS and tDCS suggest that their effects on spinal network excitability may be different from that in the cortex. Until now, the effects of tDCS on lumbar spinal network excitability have never been studied. In this series of experiments, on healthy subjects, we studied the effects of anodal tDCS over the lower limb motor cortex on (i) reciprocal Ia inhibition projecting from the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) to the soleus (SOL), (ii) presynaptic inhibition of SOL Ia terminals, (iii) homonymous SOL recurrent inhibition, and (iv) SOL H-reflex recruitment curves. The results show that anodal tDCS decreases reciprocal Ia inhibition, increases recurrent inhibition and induces no modification of presynaptic inhibition of SOL Ia terminals and of SOL-H reflex recruitment curves. Our results indicate therefore that the effects of tDCS are the opposite of those previously described for TMS on spinal network excitability. They also indicate that anodal tDCS induces effects on spinal network excitability similar to those observed during co-contraction suggesting that anodal tDCS activates descending corticospinal projections mainly involved in co-contractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21502292      PMCID: PMC3112557          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  39 in total

1.  Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; M Hallett; A Berardelli; A Eisen; P Rossini; W Paulus
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate spinal cord revisited.

Authors:  P Rudomin; R F Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability.

Authors:  Alberto Priori
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Reciprocal group I inhibition on triceps surae motoneurons in man.

Authors:  Y Mizuno; R Tanaka; N Yanagisawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The rubrospinal tract. IV. Effects on interneurones.

Authors:  T Hongo; E Jankowska; A Lundberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Focal and bi-directional modulation of lower limb motor cortex using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Sangeetha Madhavan; James W Stinear
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Michael A Nitsche; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Evidence for recurrent inhibition of reciprocal inhibition from soleus to tibialis anterior in man.

Authors:  M Baret; R Katz; J C Lamy; A Pénicaud; I Wargon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  21 in total

1.  Beyond the target area: remote effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.

Authors:  Jared Cooney Horvath; Simon J Vogrin; Olivia Carter; Mark J Cook; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Does anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of the damaged primary motor cortex affects wrist flexor muscle spasticity and also activity of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles in patients with stroke?: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sara Halakoo; Fatemeh Ehsani; Nooshin Masoudian; Maryam Zoghi; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the "broken escalator" phenomenon using anodal tDCS.

Authors:  D Kaski; S Quadir; M Patel; N Yousif; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the psychomotor, cognitive, and motor performances of power athletes.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Yohan Grandperrin; Magali Nicolier; Philippe Gimenez; Chrystelle Vidal; Gregory Tio; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Can Alter Cortical Excitability of the Lower Extremity in Healthy Participants: A Review and Methodological Study.

Authors:  John Tyler Floyd; Chad Lairamore; Mark Kevin Garrision; Adam J Woods; Jacqueline L Rainey; Thomas Kiser; Prasad R Padala; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Front Neurol Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-10-08

8.  Breaking the ice to improve motor outcomes in patients with chronic stroke: a retrospective clinical study on neuromodulation plus robotics.

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Luana Billeri; Alfredo Manuli; Tina Balletta; Antonino Cannavò; Simona Portaro; Paola Lauria; Fabrizio Ciappina; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be).

Authors:  Jared C Horvath; Olivia Carter; Jason D Forte
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 10.  Transcranial brain stimulation to promote functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.