Literature DB >> 26404530

Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.

Jessamyn Schertz1, Taehong Cho2, Andrew Lotto3, Natasha Warner4.   

Abstract

Listeners possess a remarkable ability to adapt to acoustic variability in the realization of speech sound categories (e.g., different accents). The current work tests whether non-native listeners adapt their use of acoustic cues in phonetic categorization when they are confronted with changes in the distribution of cues in the input, as native listeners do, and examines to what extent these adaptation patterns are influenced by individual cue-weighting strategies. In line with previous work, native English listeners, who use voice onset time (VOT) as a primary cue to the stop voicing contrast (e.g., 'pa' vs. 'ba'), adjusted their use of f0 (a secondary cue to the contrast) when confronted with a noncanonical "accent" in which the two cues gave conflicting information about category membership. Native Korean listeners' adaptation strategies, while variable, were predictable based on their initial cue weighting strategies. In particular, listeners who used f0 as the primary cue to category membership adjusted their use of VOT (their secondary cue) in response to the noncanonical accent, mirroring the native pattern of "downweighting" a secondary cue. Results suggest that non-native listeners show native-like sensitivity to distributional information in the input and use this information to adjust categorization, just as native listeners do, with the specific trajectory of category adaptation governed by initial cue-weighting strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; L2 speech perception; Perceptual learning; Psycholinguistics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26404530      PMCID: PMC4707058          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0987-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  43 in total

1.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Patricia K Kuhl; Reiko Akahane-Yamada; Eugen Diesch; Yoh'ich Tohkura; Andreas Kettermann; Claudia Siebert
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-02

2.  Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Andrea Weber; Holger Mitterer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English.

Authors:  Constance M Clarke; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults.

Authors:  Paul Iverson; Valerie Hazan; Kerry Bannister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The weckud wetch of the wast: lexical adaptation to a novel accent.

Authors:  Jessica Maye; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05

Review 8.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Auditory and phonetic processes in place perception for stops.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; H C Nusbaum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-12

10.  Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Olga Dmitrieva; Amanda Shultz; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Individual differences in categorical perception of speech: Cue weighting and executive function.

Authors:  Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-09-23

2.  Dynamic re-weighting of acoustic and contextual cues in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Wednesday Bushong; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-04-21

5.  Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.

Authors:  Jessamyn Schertz; Taehong Cho; Andrew Lotto; Natasha Warner
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.