Literature DB >> 26542400

Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning.

Bharath Chandrasekaran1,2, Han-Gyol Yi3, Kirsten E Smayda4, W Todd Maddox4.   

Abstract

Learning nonnative speech categories is often considered a challenging task in adulthood. This difficulty is driven by cross-language differences in weighting critical auditory dimensions that differentiate speech categories. For example, previous studies have shown that differentiating Mandarin tonal categories requires attending to dimensions related to pitch height and direction. Relative to native speakers of Mandarin, the pitch direction dimension is underweighted by native English speakers. In the current study, we examined the effect of explicit instructions (dimension instruction) on native English speakers' Mandarin tone category learning within the framework of a dual-learning systems (DLS) model. This model predicts that successful speech category learning is initially mediated by an explicit, reflective learning system that frequently utilizes unidimensional rules, with an eventual switch to a more implicit, reflexive learning system that utilizes multidimensional rules. Participants were explicitly instructed to focus and/or ignore the pitch height dimension, the pitch direction dimension, or were given no explicit prime. Our results show that instruction instructing participants to focus on pitch direction, and instruction diverting attention away from pitch height, resulted in enhanced tone categorization. Computational modeling of participant responses suggested that instruction related to pitch direction led to faster and more frequent use of multidimensional reflexive strategies and enhanced perceptual selectivity along the previously underweighted pitch direction dimension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Category learning; Computational modeling; Dual-learning systems; Instruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26542400      PMCID: PMC4744489          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0999-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  72 in total

1.  Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; Tyler K Perrachione; Todd B Parrish
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Jiyeon Lee; Louisa Y Y Ha; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual separability, decisional separability, and the identification-speeded classification relationship.

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 5.  Estimating the parameters of multidimensional signal detection theory from simultaneous ratings on separate stimulus components.

Authors:  F G Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-09

6.  Array models for category learning.

Authors:  W K Estes
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.

Authors:  S E Lively; J S Logan; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Patricia K Kuhl; Toshiaki Imada; Paul Iverson; John Pruitt; Erica B Stevens; Masaki Kawakatsu; Yoh'ichi Tohkura; Iku Nemoto
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06

2.  Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Sarah K Schellinger; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Stability and plasticity in neural encoding of linguistically relevant pitch patterns.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Task-General and Acoustic-Invariant Neural Representation of Speech Categories in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Gangyi Feng; Zhenzhong Gan; Suiping Wang; Patrick C M Wong; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Task and distribution sampling affect auditory category learning.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Auditory and visual category learning in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Casey L Roark; Kirsten E Smayda; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-08-02

Review 7.  What Can Lexical Tone Training Studies in Adults Tell Us about Tone Processing in Children?

Authors:  Mark Antoniou; Jessica L L Chin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-23

8.  Benefits of fading in perceptual learning are driven by more than dimensional attention.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Milen L Radell; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intentional Training With Speech Production Supports Children's Learning the Meanings of Foreign Words: A Comparison of Four Learning Tasks.

Authors:  Katja Junttila; Sari Ylinen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-29

10.  Non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation selectively enhances speech category learning in adults.

Authors:  Matthew K Leonard; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Fernando Llanos; Jacie R McHaney; William L Schuerman; Han G Yi
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2020-08-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.