BACKGROUND: During limb development, chondrocytes and osteoblasts emerge from condensations of limb bud mesenchyme. These cells then proliferate and differentiate in separate but adjacent compartments and function cooperatively to promote bone growth through the process of endochondral ossification. While many aspects of limb skeletal formation are understood, little is known about the mechanisms that link the development of undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme with formation of the precartilaginous condensation and subsequent proliferative expansion of chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages. The aim of this study was to gain insight into these processes by examining the roles of c-Myc and N-Myc in morphogenesis of the limb skeleton. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate c-Myc function in skeletal development, we characterized mice in which floxed c-Myc alleles were deleted in undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme with Prx1-Cre, in chondro-osteoprogenitors with Sox9-Cre and in osteoblasts with Osx1-Cre. We show that c-Myc promotes the proliferative expansion of both chondrocytes and osteoblasts and as a consequence controls the process of endochondral growth and ossification and determines bone size. The control of proliferation by c-Myc was related to its effects on global gene transcription, as phosphorylation of the C-Terminal Domain (pCTD) of RNA Polymerase II, a marker of general transcription initiation, was tightly coupled to cell proliferation of growth plate chondrocytes where c-Myc is expressed and severely downregulated in the absence of c-Myc. Finally, we show that combined deletion of N-Myc and c-Myc in early limb bud mesenchyme gives rise to a severely hypoplastic limb skeleton that exhibits features characteristic of individual c-Myc and N-Myc mutants. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that N-Myc and c-Myc act sequentially during limb development to coordinate the expansion of key progenitor populations responsible for forming the limb skeleton.
BACKGROUND: During limb development, chondrocytes and osteoblasts emerge from condensations of limb bud mesenchyme. These cells then proliferate and differentiate in separate but adjacent compartments and function cooperatively to promote bone growth through the process of endochondral ossification. While many aspects of limb skeletal formation are understood, little is known about the mechanisms that link the development of undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme with formation of the precartilaginous condensation and subsequent proliferative expansion of chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages. The aim of this study was to gain insight into these processes by examining the roles of c-Myc and N-Myc in morphogenesis of the limb skeleton. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate c-Myc function in skeletal development, we characterized mice in which floxed c-Myc alleles were deleted in undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme with Prx1-Cre, in chondro-osteoprogenitors with Sox9-Cre and in osteoblasts with Osx1-Cre. We show that c-Myc promotes the proliferative expansion of both chondrocytes and osteoblasts and as a consequence controls the process of endochondral growth and ossification and determines bone size. The control of proliferation by c-Myc was related to its effects on global gene transcription, as phosphorylation of the C-Terminal Domain (pCTD) of RNA Polymerase II, a marker of general transcription initiation, was tightly coupled to cell proliferation of growth plate chondrocytes where c-Myc is expressed and severely downregulated in the absence of c-Myc. Finally, we show that combined deletion of N-Myc and c-Myc in early limb bud mesenchyme gives rise to a severely hypoplastic limb skeleton that exhibits features characteristic of individual c-Myc and N-Myc mutants. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that N-Myc and c-Myc act sequentially during limb development to coordinate the expansion of key progenitor populations responsible for forming the limb skeleton.
The limb skeleton develops from limb buds that are initially composed of rapidly
proliferating multipotent mesenchymal stem cells encased in ectoderm. These cells
are maintained in a proliferative and undifferentiated state primarily by the
secretion of Fgf and Wnt ligands from ectoderm [1], [2]. As the limb bud expands,
centrally located cells begin to condense and their increasing distance from surface
ectoderm-derived proliferative signals corresponds to their exit from the cell cycle
[3]. From
condensing mesenchyme emerge progenitors of chondrogenic, osteogenic, tendon,
ligament and other connective tissues lineages [4], [5], [6], [3]. Further outgrowth of the limb
skeleton is governed largely by the coordinated homeostatic expansion and
differentiation of chondrocytes within the longitudinally oriented structure known
as the growth plate, and osteoblasts in immediately adjacent perichondrial tissue
[7], [8]. During bone
growth a subset of slowly proliferating chondrocyte progenitors within the growth
plate continuously enter into a program of terminal differentiation, where they
first undergo proliferative expansion and then undergo hypertrophy and die. The
extracellular matrix laid down by terminally differentiated chondrocytes serves as a
template for invasion of blood vessels, which in turn serve as a conduit for the
emigration of osteoblasts from their perichondrial residence onto the cartilaginous
template. The dying chondrocytes and invading osteoblasts establish the ossification
front where differentiating osteoblasts then promote bone mineralization and
ossification in the process of endochondral ossification.Chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages arising from condensing mesenchyme in the limb
bud are defined by the expression and activity of the transcription factors Sox9 and
Runx2/Cbfa1 respectively [8]. Sox9 regulates a variety of genes encoding extracellular
matrix components that guide chondrocyte behavior and function, and its deletion
prior to condensation in the limb bud completely blocks cartilage formation [9], [10]. In contrast
to Sox9, deletion of Runx2 completely blocks
development of the osteoblast lineage and therefore bone ossification [11], [12], [13].
Sox9 deletion in the early limb bud also blocks
Runx2 expression and osteogenesis because the osteogenic
lineage is derived from condensing mesenchyme of the limb bud that fails to properly
form in the absence of Sox9
[10].
Furthermore, Sox9 controls this early step in osteochondro-progenitor cell fate
determination by directly interacting with Runx2 and inhibiting
Runx2 transcriptional activity and its ability to promote
osteogenesis [14].Runx2 is not only a cell autonomous regulator of the osteogenic lineage, but also has
cell non-autonomous effects on osteoblasts by promoting chondrocyte maturation and
expression of Vegfa in prehypertrophic chondrocytes [15], [16]. Vegfa produced in the
prehypertrophic chondrocytes in turn acts on endothelial cells outside the cartilage
to direct vascular recruitment and invasion into the matrix formed by terminally
differentiating chondrocytes at the ossification front [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Like Runx2,
Indian Hedgehog (Ihh) expression is also
initiated in prehypertrophic chondrocytes and Ihh appears to have a positive
influence on blood vessel development or function [21], [22]. Ihh secreted from
prehypertrophic chondrocytes also has a more well-characterized role in governing
proliferation of chondrocytes in the growth plate, as well as osteoblasts in the
perichondrium, by binding to its receptor Patched-1 (Ptch-1) at these locations and
by stimulating production of Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) [8]. Thus,
chondrocyte maturation directed by Runx2 and IHH indirectly influences osteoblast
proliferation to promote endochondral ossification.Despite major advances in the understanding of chondrocyte and osteoblast lineage
determination and endochondral growth, little is known about the mechanisms that
link the development of undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme with formation of the
precartilaginous condensation and subsequent development and expansion of
chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages. Potential candidates for coordinating these
activities are Myc family transcription factors, particularly c-Myc and N-Myc, which
are known to strongly influence the development and maintenance of pluripotent and
multipotent in a number of homeostatic tissues (reviewed in [23], [24]). N-Myc and
c-Myc are sequentially expressed in developing limbs, with
N-Myc expressed primarily in undifferentiated limb bud
mesenchyme and c-Myc expressed in proliferating chondrocytes of the
growth plate and osteoblasts in the perichondrium (see below). N-Myc is known to
promote the proliferative expansion of undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme, which
in turn influences the formation of condensing mesenchyme and production of
osteochondro-progenitors [25], [3]. In contrast, c-Myc has been implicated in the control of
chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation in the growth plate [26], [27], [28], [29], but its
effects on cartilage formation and endochondral ossification are poorly defined.
Using conditional deletion mutants, we show here that c-Myc plays an important role
in endochondral ossification and bone growth by promoting efficient proliferative
expansion of both chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages. Consistent with N-Myc and
c-Myc playing unique and complementary roles in limb skeletal development, combined
deletion of N-Myc and c-Myc in the early limb bud
gives rise to a severe limb miniaturization phenotype that exhibits features
characteristic of individual c-Myc and N-Myc
mutants. Together, our results indicate that N-Myc and c-Myc function to maintain
and expand distinct and sequentially formed progenitor populations responsible for
forming the limb skeleton.
Results
c-Myc does not influence limb bud outgrowth, but controls the initial growth
of the limb skeleton
To investigate the role of c-Myc in limb development,
c-Myc conditional alleles [30] were deleted with
Prx1-Cre, which is active in undifferentiated limb bud
mesenchyme prior to formation of Sox9-dependent cartilage [31], [10]. At E10.5,
c-Myc is expressed at the base of the forelimb bud (Fig. 1A) in a region near to
where Sox9 is expressed (see Fig.
2A–B'), but not in undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme.
At E11.5 c-Myc is expressed most intensely in a ring of tissue
in the central/proximal limb bud (Fig. 1B) that appears to surround and perhaps partly overlap with
the expression domains of both Sox9 and Runx2 (Fig. 2C and Fig. 2G respectively). At E12.5, in addition
to a ring pattern of expression in the more proximal limb region (Fig. 1C) that overlaps Runx2
expression (Fig. 2H),
c-Myc is visible in the initial cartilage templates of the
autopod (Fig. 1C). At E13.5
c-Myc is expressed in both chondrocytes of cartilage anlage
and perichondrium where osteoblasts reside (Fig. 1C). Consistent with early and robust
Prx1-Cre activity in limb bud mesenchyme that precedes Sox9
expression [5], [31], c-Myc expression is extinguished in
E10.5 and E12.5 limb buds of Prx1-Cre c-Myc
fl/fl
(c-Myc cko) mice and in chondrocyctes and perichondrial
cells at E13.5 (Fig. 1A',
B', C'). The residual proximal limb bud
c-Myc expression observed in c-Myc cko
limb buds at E12.5 is likely in non-targeted muscle cells streaming into the
limb buds since c-Myc expression is apparent in muscle cells at
later stages (not shown).
Figure 1
c-Myc plays an early role in appendicular skeletal
development.
(A–C') Whole mount in situ hybridization of
c-Myc in forelimb buds at E10.5, E11.5 and E12.5 of
wildtype and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant embryos. (D, D') In situ
hybridization for c-Myc in sections of proximal tibia
at E13.5 of wildtype and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant embryos. (E, E')
Higher magnification views of proximal tibia sections shown in D and
D'. Cartilage and (C) and perichondrium (P) are indicated. (H, I)
BrdU staining in limb buds at E11.5 and proximal tibia at E13.5
respectively. (J) Summary of BrdU-positive cells in the proliferative
zone (PZ) and perichondrium (Pc).
Figure 2
Limb bud deletion of c-Myc affects
Sox9 and Runx2 expression and
formation of cartilage anlage.
Analysis of Sox9 expression (A-D') and Runx2
expression (E-G') by in situ hybridization in forelimbs of
Prx1-Cre control and c-Myc cko
embryos at the indicated stages. Dashed lines delineate the limb bud.
(H, H') Alcian blue staining of forelimb and hindlinb cartilage
anlage of control and c-Myc cko embryos at E13.5.
c-Myc plays an early role in appendicular skeletal
development.
(A–C') Whole mount in situ hybridization of
c-Myc in forelimb buds at E10.5, E11.5 and E12.5 of
wildtype and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant embryos. (D, D') In situ
hybridization for c-Myc in sections of proximal tibia
at E13.5 of wildtype and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant embryos. (E, E')
Higher magnification views of proximal tibia sections shown in D and
D'. Cartilage and (C) and perichondrium (P) are indicated. (H, I)
BrdU staining in limb buds at E11.5 and proximal tibia at E13.5
respectively. (J) Summary of BrdU-positive cells in the proliferative
zone (PZ) and perichondrium (Pc).
Limb bud deletion of c-Myc affects
Sox9 and Runx2 expression and
formation of cartilage anlage.
Analysis of Sox9 expression (A-D') and Runx2
expression (E-G') by in situ hybridization in forelimbs of
Prx1-Cre control and c-Myc cko
embryos at the indicated stages. Dashed lines delineate the limb bud.
(H, H') Alcian blue staining of forelimb and hindlinb cartilage
anlage of control and c-Myc cko embryos at E13.5.Consistent with c-Myc playing a role in development of the
initial cartilage template of the limb skeleton, Alcian blue staining at E13.5
revealed a reduction in the size of all limb skeletal elements (Fig. 1F,G), including the
elements of the shoulder (scapula) and hindlimb girdle (ilium and ishium), which
do not develop from mesenchyme within the limb bud proper [31]. The scapula, which develops
from the somatopleure of the forelimb field (cranial part of the scapula that
articulates with the humerus) and somitic dermomytome (scapula blade) [31], was more
affected than the illium/ishium, a result consistent with
Prx1-Cre being more active in the emerging forelimb bud and
surrounding limb field than comparable regions of the developing hindlimb bud
[10],
[32].To examine the relationship between the decreased size of the cartilaginous
elements and cell proliferation, BrdU incorporation assays performed at E11.5
and E13.5 (Fig. 1H, I).
Whereas no consistent change in the pattern of BrdU incorporation was evident at
E11.5, there was a strong reduction in BrdU incorporation in both chondrocytes
of the emerging growth plate and in perichondrial cells at E13.5 (Fig. 1H, I, J).
Sox9 and Runx2 expression in the developing
limb skeleton are disrupted by c-Myc-deficiency
To further evaluate how c-Myc deletion influenced chondrocyte
and osteoblast development in the developing limb, Sox9 and
Runx2 expression was examined. At E10.5,
c-Myc mutants consistently showed upregulation and/or
expanded expression of Sox9 (Fig. 2A–B' also see Fig. 7IV–J), which marks
the precartilaginous condensation. Sox9 expression was
similarly upregulated/expanded in hindlimb buds at E11.5 (not shown), a
developmental stage roughly equivalent to E10.5 in forelimb buds. In contrast,
mutant forelimb buds at E11.5 consistently exhibited reduced intensity and area
of Sox9 expression compared to Prx1-Cre
controls (Fig. 2C, C').
Sox9 expression at E12.5, now marking the cartilage
template of the developing limb skeleton, remained weak in
c-Myc mutants (Fig. 2D, D').
Figure 7
Combined c-Myc and N-Myc deletion
mimics deletion of N-Myc alone in the early limb bud
and prevents Sox9 upregulation caused by c-Myc
deletion.
(IA–D) BrdU labeling of limb buds at E10.5 for the indicated
genotypes. Higher magnification views of boxed areas (red) are shown in
A'–D'. Similar results were observed in sections from
three different limb buds. (IIA–D') pRpCTD
immunohistochemistry of E10.5 limb buds of the indicated genotypes with
high (IIIA–D) Comparison of limb size and morphology for the
indicated strains at E12.5. (IV) Whole mount in situ hybridization for
Fgf8, Shh and
Sox9 at E10.5 and Runx2 at E11.5
in Prx1-Cre, c-Myc cko, N-Myc cko and
dcko embryos.
Runx2, encoding the master regulator of the osteoblast lineage,
was expressed in lateral plate mesoderm adjacent to the emerging forelimb bud at
E10.5 as previously described [5], and Runx2 expression in this region appeared to not
be appreciably altered by Prx1-Cre deletion of
c-Myc (Fig.
2G, G'). At E11.5 and E12.5, the initial Runx2
expression domains in forelimb bud mesenchyme (Fig. 2H–I'), which partially
overlap Sox9 expression (Fig. 2C, D, also see [5], were reduced in
c-Myc mutants. These results suggest that reduced skeletal
size caused by loss of c-Myc is related to inefficient expansion of the
chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages.
Control of endochondral bone growth and ossification by
c-Myc
At E15.5 the coordinated actions of chondrocytes within the growth plate and
osteoblasts in the perichondrium initiate the process of endochondral
ossification. Alcian blue staining of skeletons at E15.5 and E18.5 showed
c-Myc mutant elements continued to be reduced in size and
exhibited small primary ossification centers (Fig. 3A–D), consistent with delayed
and/or defective endochondral ossification. von Kossa staining (mineralized
bone) at E15.5 confirmed a delay in forming the primary ossification center (not
shown) At postnatal day 7, tibias were small but fully ossified (Fig. 3E). Measurements of bone
length at E18.5 showed a similar reduction in the size of all appendicular
elements, with the scapula most affected (Fig. 3F).
Figure 3
Delayed endochondral ossification and suppressed bone growth caused
by c-Myc deficiency.
Alcian blue and Alizarin red stained forelimb and hindlimb skeletal
preparations at E15.5 (A) and E18.5 (C). Arrows point to primary
ossification centers of the humerus and femur to indicate delayed
(E15.5) and smaller (E18.5) ossification centers in
c-Myc deficient limbs. (B, D) Alcian blue and
hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections at E15.5 and E16.5.
Bars indicate length of primary ossification center. (E) Alizarin red
stained tibia at P7 showing small, but fully ossified bone in c-Myc
mutants. (F) Measurement of bone length at E18.5. Autopod length was
from the tip of digit 3 to the base of the lunate carpal bone.
Delayed endochondral ossification and suppressed bone growth caused
by c-Myc deficiency.
Alcian blue and Alizarin red stained forelimb and hindlimb skeletal
preparations at E15.5 (A) and E18.5 (C). Arrows point to primary
ossification centers of the humerus and femur to indicate delayed
(E15.5) and smaller (E18.5) ossification centers in
c-Myc deficient limbs. (B, D) Alcian blue and
hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections at E15.5 and E16.5.
Bars indicate length of primary ossification center. (E) Alizarin red
stained tibia at P7 showing small, but fully ossified bone in c-Myc
mutants. (F) Measurement of bone length at E18.5. Autopod length was
from the tip of digit 3 to the base of the lunate carpal bone.
The activities of c-Myc in limb development are limited to after formation of
chondro-osteoprogenitors
Although c-Myc appears to not be expressed in undifferentiated limb bud
mesenchyme (Fig. 1A, B), to
rule out that the effects on Sox9 and Runx2 expression and the small skeleton
produced by Prx1-Cre deletion of c-Myc might
be due to cryptic c-Myc activity in early undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme,
we deleted c-Myc with Sox9-Cre, which is not active prior to
development of chondro-osteoprogenitors and the precartilaginous condensation
[5].
Sox9-Cre deletion of c-Myc resulted in small limb skeletal
elements with delayed and small primary ossification centers (Fig. S1), a
phenotype essentially identical to that caused by Prx1-Cre
deletion. These results indicate that the function of c-Myc in appendicular
skeletal development is largely, if not wholly, restricted to after formation of
chondro-osteoprogenitors.In addition, deletion of c-Myc with Osx1-Cre,
which is active in osteoblasts after Runx2-dependent commitment to the
osteoblast lineage [33], had no apparent effect on endochondral ossification
or bone growth (Fig. S2). The latter results suggest that either c-Myc functions at
a relatively early step(s) in osteoblast development that is prior to the role
Osterix plays in osteoblast differentiation [34] or that it does not
directly regulate osteoblasts (see Discussion).
c-Myc controls the number of differentiated chondrocytes
produced in the growth plate
Differentiated chondrocytes play critical roles in endochondral ossification by
producing factors such as Vegfa and IHH that signal to osteoblasts in adjacent
perichondrium. Analysis of BrdU incorporation at E16.5, when endochondral
ossification has commenced, revealed a continued diminution of proliferation
(Fig. 4A, B). Very
similar results were observed with c-Mycdeficient tibias at
E18.5 (not shown). In addition to decreased proliferation in the proliferative
zone of the growth plate, there appeared to be lower levels of proliferation in
the epiphyseal articulating surface (Fig. 4A, see arrows), suggesting that c-Myc
may play a role in the development of articular cartilage.
Figure 4
Control of cell proliferation and cell density in the growth plate by
c-Myc.
(A) BrdU labeling of control and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant
proximal tibia at E16.5. Approximate locations of specific regions of
the growth plate (GP) and perichondrium (Pc) are indicated and higher
magnification images for the RZ (yellow dashed box) and PZ (red dashed
box) are shown at right. The division between cartilage and
perichondrium in (A) is marked by the black dashed line. Arrow point to
articular regions that show reduced proliferation in
c-Myc mutants. (B) Percentage of BrdU labeled cells
in comparable regions of the RZ, PZ and perichondrium (Pc) of
Prx1-Cre control (c) tibias and Prx1-Cre
c-Myc mutant tibias (see Materials and Methods for details). C) Proximal tibias of
the indicated stains at E16.5 stained for Col2a1 and DAPI. Higher
magnification views are at right. (D) Proximal tibias stained for ColX
and DAPI with higher magnification views at right. (E) The percentage
change in cell density (cells per unit area) of c-Myc
mutants compared to controls in comparable regions of PZ and HZ as
determined from sections stained with DAPI alone (see Materials and Methods).
*p<0.01.
Control of cell proliferation and cell density in the growth plate by
c-Myc.
(A) BrdU labeling of control and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant
proximal tibia at E16.5. Approximate locations of specific regions of
the growth plate (GP) and perichondrium (Pc) are indicated and higher
magnification images for the RZ (yellow dashed box) and PZ (red dashed
box) are shown at right. The division between cartilage and
perichondrium in (A) is marked by the black dashed line. Arrow point to
articular regions that show reduced proliferation in
c-Myc mutants. (B) Percentage of BrdU labeled cells
in comparable regions of the RZ, PZ and perichondrium (Pc) of
Prx1-Cre control (c) tibias and Prx1-Cre
c-Myc mutant tibias (see Materials and Methods for details). C) Proximal tibias of
the indicated stains at E16.5 stained for Col2a1 and DAPI. Higher
magnification views are at right. (D) Proximal tibias stained for ColX
and DAPI with higher magnification views at right. (E) The percentage
change in cell density (cells per unit area) of c-Myc
mutants compared to controls in comparable regions of PZ and HZ as
determined from sections stained with DAPI alone (see Materials and Methods).
*p<0.01.The decreased chondrocyte proliferation in the growth plate corresponded to a
significant decrease in the density of cells in the proliferative and
hypertrophic zones of c-Myc deficient growth plates as
determined by counting DAPI-positive cells (Fig. 4C, E). The reduced cell density caused
by loss of c-Myc is associated with an increased abundance of
Collagen Type 2a1 (Col2) in the extracellular matrix. An even greater decrease
in cell density was observed in the hypertrophic region marked by Collagen Type
X (ColX) (Fig. 4D, E). In
contrast to the prehypertrophic and hypertrophic regions of the growth plate,
the cell density and already low level of proliferation in the resting zone of
proximal tibias was much less affected by loss of c-Myc (Fig. 4A and not shown). These results support
a role for c-Myc in initiating and promoting the proliferative
expansion of chondrocytes in the growth plate. The decrease in proliferation and
in Runx2 expression in the perichondrium also suggests that
c-Myc regulates expansion of osteoblasts, but the less-well defined architecture
of the perichondrium compared to the growth plate is not amenable to an accurate
determination of how loss of c-Myc might affect cell density at this
location.
Defective endochondral ossification is linked to decreased
Vegfa expression and disrupted vasculogenesis
To further characterize endochondral growth and ossification in
c-Myc mutants, we examined the relationship between ColX
protein expression in hypertrophic chondrocytes of the growth plate and
Collagen type I (Col1) mRNA expression in
osteoblasts. In E18.5 tibias, the area of hypertrophic ColX expression was
reduced, but what was more striking was a marked decrease in
Col1 expression in perichondrium and bone collar regions as
well as in the primary ossification center (Fig. 5A, B). The osteoblast marker
Osteocalcin was strongly reduced in the same regions
(not shown). In addition, Runx2 expression
in perichondrium was reduced at E18.5 (Fig. 5C), suggesting that osteoblastogenesis
is compromised in c-Myc mutants.
Figure 5
Disrupted endochondral ossification in c-Myc mutants
is linked to decreased numbers of osteoblasts and poor
vascularization.
(A) Combined ColXa1 immunohistochemistry and Col1 in
situ hybridization at E18.5 showing a smaller hypertrophy zone (marked
by ColXa1 – green) and reduced Col1 (dark
staining) in the perichondrium of c-Myc mutant tibia.
(B) Higher magnification view of the primary ossification center and
adjacent perichondrium showing fewer Col1-positive
osteoblasts (orange arrow) and a thinner Col1-positive
layer in the perichondrium of c-Myc mutant tibia. Red
staining is pan-cytokeratin.(C) Runx2 in situ hybridization. (D)
Vegfa in situ hybridization showing reduced
expression in hypertrophic chondrocytes of c-Myc mutant
tibia at E18.5. Approximate locations of proliferative and
prehypertrophic zones are indicated and higher magnification images of
boxed regions are shown at right. (E) PECAM immunohistochemistry
indicating reduced vascularization of the primary ossification center
and perichondrium of c-Myc deficient tibia. Red boxed
area is shown at higher magnification on right. (F) TUNEL staining for
apoptotic cells at the ossification fronts of control and
c-Myc mutant tibia.
Disrupted endochondral ossification in c-Myc mutants
is linked to decreased numbers of osteoblasts and poor
vascularization.
(A) Combined ColXa1 immunohistochemistry and Col1 in
situ hybridization at E18.5 showing a smaller hypertrophy zone (marked
by ColXa1 – green) and reduced Col1 (dark
staining) in the perichondrium of c-Myc mutant tibia.
(B) Higher magnification view of the primary ossification center and
adjacent perichondrium showing fewer Col1-positive
osteoblasts (orange arrow) and a thinner Col1-positive
layer in the perichondrium of c-Myc mutant tibia. Red
staining is pan-cytokeratin.(C) Runx2 in situ hybridization. (D)
Vegfa in situ hybridization showing reduced
expression in hypertrophic chondrocytes of c-Myc mutant
tibia at E18.5. Approximate locations of proliferative and
prehypertrophic zones are indicated and higher magnification images of
boxed regions are shown at right. (E) PECAM immunohistochemistry
indicating reduced vascularization of the primary ossification center
and perichondrium of c-Mycdeficient tibia. Red boxed
area is shown at higher magnification on right. (F) TUNEL staining for
apoptotic cells at the ossification fronts of control and
c-Myc mutant tibia.Runx2 expression was also reduced in the growth plate (Fig. 5C and also see Fig. 9IIG). Because
Vegfa expression in the growth plate is dependent on
Runx2
[16], we
examined Vegfa in control and mutant tibias. Both the number of
cells expressing Vegfa in hypertrophic chondrocytes and the
intensity of it's expression was reduced in the absence of
c-Myc (Fig.
5D). Consistent with reduced expression of Vegfa,
blood vessel formation, as marked by expression of PECAM (CD31) was markedly
decreased in the perichondrium and ossification front of c-Myc
mutant tibias (Fig. 5E), but
not in adjacent non-skeletal tissues (data not shown). These results suggest
that the decreased number of osteocytes within the primary ossification center
and the delayed and defective endochondral ossification observed in
c-Myc mutants may be partly due to defects in
vascularization.
Figure 9
Unique and additive contributions of N-Myc and
c-Myc to endochondral growth and
ossification.
(IA–D') Histological comparison of E18.8 proximal tibia of
N-Myc, c-Myc and
dcko mutant embryos. Green dashed lines outline the
epiphyseal head regions and higher magnification views of the
black-boxed regions are shown (A'–D'). Arrow in
dcko image (D) indicates fusion between
tibia/fibula and femur. (E–H) Combined ColXa1 immunohistochemistry
(green) and Col1 in situ hybridization (dark blue) at
E18.5. (II) In situ hybridization of Ihh (A–D),
Runx2 (E–H) and Vegfa
(I–L) and PECAM immunohistochemistry (M–P) in tibia sections
at E18.5 from the indicated mouse strains. Yellow boxed regions in M-P
are shown in M'–P'.
Another potential mechanism by which c-Myc might influence the
number of differentiated chondrocytes in the growth plate and endochondral
ossification is defective apoptosis. However, c-Myc deficiency
caused no increase in apoptosis as measured by TUNEL staining and Lysotracker
staining in the growth plate or perichondrium of tibias at E15.5 or E18.5 (Fig. 5F and not shown).
Expression of key regulators of chondrocyte proliferation and endochondral
ossification in the absence of c-Myc
The reduced number of chondrocytes in proliferative and hypertrophic zones of
c-Myc deficient growth plates, along with reduced numbers
of Col1-, osteocalcin- and
Runx2-positive osteoblasts in the perichondrium, suggested
that loss of c-Myc might broadly influence signaling systems
that promote proliferation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts. Consistent with this
idea, both the expression domains and expression intensity of
IHH, Ptch-1 and PTHrPR
were markedly reduced in the absence of c-Myc (Fig. 6A-D'). In addition, expression of
Fgfr3, which is expressed primarily in the proliferative
zone but is a negative regulator of chondrocyte proliferation [35], was also
reduced (Fig. 6E,E').
Thus, like Runx2, Sox9 and
Vegfa, each of these genes was expressed in the appropriate
location within the growth plate and perichondrium (where applicable), but their
expression levels appeared reduced.
Figure 6
Decreased expression of key regulators of the transition from
proliferation to prehypertrophy in chondrocytes in the absence of
c-Myc deletion.
(A–E') In situ hybridization (purple signal) of
c-Myc, Fgfr3,
IHH, Ptch-1 and PTHrPR in control and
c-Myc proximal tibia at E16.5. Arrows point to
perichondrial expression of c-Myc, Ptch-1 and
PTHrPR expression. Approximate subregions of the
growth plate are indicated. (F, G) pRpCTD (pCTD) immunohistochemistry of
control and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant tibias at E16.5. Higher magnification
views are shown at right. Approximate subregions (RZ, PZ and PHZ) of the
growth plate are indicated and perichonium (Pc) and growth plate (GP)
regions of the higher magnification are indicated.
Decreased expression of key regulators of the transition from
proliferation to prehypertrophy in chondrocytes in the absence of
c-Myc deletion.
(A–E') In situ hybridization (purple signal) of
c-Myc, Fgfr3,
IHH, Ptch-1 and PTHrPR in control and
c-Myc proximal tibia at E16.5. Arrows point to
perichondrial expression of c-Myc, Ptch-1 and
PTHrPR expression. Approximate subregions of the
growth plate are indicated. (F, G) pRpCTD (pCTD) immunohistochemistry of
control and Prx1-Cre c-Myc mutant tibias at E16.5. Higher magnification
views are shown at right. Approximate subregions (RZ, PZ and PHZ) of the
growth plate are indicated and perichonium (Pc) and growth plate (GP)
regions of the higher magnification are indicated.Although the above results raised the possibility that a general reduction in
gene transcription might be an important mechanism underlying the effect of
c-Myc deficiency on skeletogenesis, it was unclear how much the observed
reduction in mRNA signals was related to decreased number/density of
chondrocytes and osteoblasts. To address this issue we examined expression of
Serine 5 phosphorylation of the C-terminal tail (pCTD) of RNA Polymerase II, an
event required for transcription to be initiated [36]. Interestingly, pCTD
was found to be robust in the proliferative compartment of the growth plate and
appeared to closely match the c-Myc expression domain (Fig. 6F). Moreover, pCTD was
remarkably low in the equivalent compartment of growth plates lacking
c-Myc (Fig.
6G). Although less robust in perichondrium relative to the
proliferative zone of the growth plate of control Prx1-Cre
mice, pCTD was also clearly reduced in c-Myc deficient
perichondrium (Fig. 6F, G).
These results support previous data suggesting that loss of c-Myc affects global
transcription in vivo [36], [24], and suggest that suppression of global
transcription, and not altered transcriptional regulation of any specific set of
Myc target genes, may be ultimately responsible for the effects of c-Myc loss on
endochondral ossification and bone size.
Combined loss of N-Myc and c-Myc in limb
bud mesenchyme causes defects in limb bud outgrowth that can be attributed to
deletion of N-Myc
N-Myc supports proliferation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells in the limb
bud and therefore contributes to the generation of
Sox9-positive cells of the limb bud core that form the
precartilaginous condensation [25], [3]. In contrast to N-Myc deletion, which
consistent to previous results caused a strong decrease in BrdU incorporation in
limb bud mesenchyme (but not in ectoderm) at E10.5, Prx1-Cre
deletion of c-Myc had little or no effect on mesenchyme
proliferation at this stage (Fig.
7IA–C, also see Fig. 1H). These effects on proliferation are consistent with the
different expression patterns of N-Myc and
c-Myc in the early limb bud (Fig. 1A–D, [25], [3]. Similar to these
differential effects on BrdU incorporation, pCTD was strongly diminished in the
mesenchyme of N-Myc and dcko mutants, but not
in c-Myc mutants (Fig. 7IIA–D'). Note that pCTD levels in the ectoderm
serves as a control because Prx1-Cre is not active in the ectoderm.
Combined c-Myc and N-Myc deletion
mimics deletion of N-Myc alone in the early limb bud
and prevents Sox9 upregulation caused by c-Myc
deletion.
(IA–D) BrdU labeling of limb buds at E10.5 for the indicated
genotypes. Higher magnification views of boxed areas (red) are shown in
A'–D'. Similar results were observed in sections from
three different limb buds. (IIA–D') pRpCTD
immunohistochemistry of E10.5 limb buds of the indicated genotypes with
high (IIIA–D) Comparison of limb size and morphology for the
indicated strains at E12.5. (IV) Whole mount in situ hybridization for
Fgf8, Shh and
Sox9 at E10.5 and Runx2 at E11.5
in Prx1-Cre, c-Myc cko, N-Myc cko and
dcko embryos.Whereas deletion of N-Myc by Prx1-Cre caused
formation of small misshapen limb buds and subsequently small skeletal elements
and syndactyly [25], loss of c-Myc had little or no
consistent effect on limb bud size and shape (Fig. 7IB, IIIB), but affected the initial
expression of Sox9 and Runx2 at limb bud
stages (Fig. 2A', 7IVJ, N) and resulted in small
skeletal elements as described above. In contrast, N-Myc
deletion suppressed the initial Sox9 and Runx2
expression at E10.5 and E11.5 respectively (Fig. 7IVC, N) and more severely affected limb
bud development, causing smaller and narrower forelimb and hindlimb buds (Fig. 7IIIC and [25].
N-Myc deficient forelimb buds were more severely affected
than hindlimb buds (Fig.
7IIIC), a result in line with the more robust
Prx1-Cre activity in the emerging forelimb bud than in the
hindlimb bud [31]. Consistent with N-Myc regulating
early undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme and limb bud outgrowth and
c-Myc acting primarily at later stages, combined deletion
of N-Myc and c-Myc with
Prx1-Cre (dcko), like deletion of
N-Myc alone, resulted in strongly reduced cell
proliferation and produced small limb buds at E10.5 (Fig. 7IC, D). Similarly,
N-Myc deficient limb buds at E12.5 exhibited the
characteristic shape and reduced size of dcko limb buds, with
forelimb buds being more severely affected (Fig. 7IIIC, D and data not shown).The small size of dcko limb buds was not due to any substantial
defects in expression of Fgf8 in the apical ectodermal ridge or
Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in the zone of
polarizing activity (Fig.
7IVA–H). Thus, defects in limb bud growth of
dcko mice occurred downstream or parallel to the activities
of the major limb bud signaling centers regulating proximal-distal and
anterior-posterior limb development. The upregulation of Sox9
at E10.5 caused by c-Myc deletion alone did not occur when
N-Myc was also deleted or in dcko mutants
(Fig. 7IVK, L and also
see Fig. 2B'), and the
initial Runx2 expression domain in the limb bud was reduced in
N-Myc and dcko mutant limb buds at E11.5
Fig. 7IVO, P). These
results are consistent with a requirement for N-Myc in the
efficient production of cells that will become Sox9 and
Runx2 expressing osteo-chondro progenitors prior to
c-Myc expression in these cells or their derivatives.
Combined loss of N-Myc and c-Myc in limb
bud mesenchyme causes severe skeletal hypoplasia and loss of proximal
elements
While N-Myc and c-Myc have unique and mostly
complementary expression patterns in the developing limb, the initial forelimb
cartilage templates of Prx1-Cre c-Myc and
N-Myc mutants at E13.5 exhibited a similar reduction in
overall size (Fig. 8A). The
forelimb skeleton of dcko embryos at E13.5 revealed a minimally developed
cartilage template with no evidence of a humerus element or proximal scapula
tissue (Fig. 8A). The
hindlimb elements of N-Myc mutants were not as severely
affected as c-Myc mutants, a result consistent with delayed
Prx1-Cre activity in hindlimb buds relative to forelimb
buds (32, Z-QZ and PJH not shown) and the demonstrated role of N-Myc (but not
c-Myc) in proliferation of limb bud mesenchyme (Fig. 7I). Furthermore, while the E13.5
hindlimb skeleton of dcko embryos was grossly hypoplastic and
the femur, like the humerus in the forelimb was missing (Fig. 8B), they were less severely affected
than dcko forelimbs (Fig. 8A), a result that again can be
attributed to delayed deletion of N-Myc in hindlimb mesenchyme
relative to forelimb. Moreover, PCR genotyping of E10.5 limb bud mesenchyme
showed robust and essentially equivalent Prx1-Cre mediated
deletion of c-Myc and N-Myc (data not shown),
indicating that any differences observed were not due to differences in ablation
efficiency. Taken together with our analysis of Prx1-Cre and
Sox9-Cre c-Myc mutants, these results are consistent with
N-Myc and c-Myc playing distinct and complementary roles during development of
the limb skeleton.
Figure 8
Combined c-Myc and N-Myc deletion results in severe limb skeletal
agenesis.
(A, B) Alcian blue stained forelimbs respectively of the indicated mouse
strains at E13.5. (C) Alcian blue stained c-Myc and
dcko mutants at E15.5. (D) Alcian blue and Alizarin
red stained preparation of E18.5 embryos showing forelimbs (yellow arrow
points to the absence of humerus and distal scapula). (E) E18.5 hindlimb
region with higher magnification image at right showing fusion of the
femur (f)-tibia (t) joint (*) of dcko embryos. (F)
Forelimbs of E20.5 embryos showing absence of humerus and scapula
elements in dcko embryos. (G) Hindlimbs of
c-Myc and dcko mutants at E20.5.
(H) Higher magnification images of the femur-tibia joint region of the
E20.5 dcko mutant shown in (G).
Combined c-Myc and N-Myc deletion results in severe limb skeletal
agenesis.
(A, B) Alcian blue stained forelimbs respectively of the indicated mouse
strains at E13.5. (C) Alcian blue stained c-Myc and
dcko mutants at E15.5. (D) Alcian blue and Alizarin
red stained preparation of E18.5 embryos showing forelimbs (yellow arrow
points to the absence of humerus and distal scapula). (E) E18.5 hindlimb
region with higher magnification image at right showing fusion of the
femur (f)-tibia (t) joint (*) of dcko embryos. (F)
Forelimbs of E20.5 embryos showing absence of humerus and scapula
elements in dcko embryos. (G) Hindlimbs of
c-Myc and dcko mutants at E20.5.
(H) Higher magnification images of the femur-tibia joint region of the
E20.5 dcko mutant shown in (G).The basic observations of dcko limb skeletons at E13.5 are
reinforced by examination of the skeleton at later stages. At E15.5, very little
can be deciphered from forlimbs of dcko embryos because they are so poorly
developed (Fig. 8C).
However, at E18.5 and E20.5, it was clear that forelimbs of
dcko embryos lacked a radius, humerous, and proximal
scapula tissue (Fig. 8D, F)
and the hindlimb exhibited a hypoplastic skeleton with poor ossification as
indicated by Alizarin red staining (Fig. 8E, G). In the dcko hindlimbs, the fibula was
absent and the femur was more affected than the tibia (Fig. 8E, G). The hindlimb girdle was less
affected than the scapula in dcko mice, with the latter being
comprised of only the most proximal component (Fig. 8D). In addition, fusion between the
femur and tibia in dcko hindlimbs was consistently observed
(Fig. 8E, H and not
shown). Finally, in the autopod of dcko forelimbs, only the
central digits (typically digits 3 and 4) were formed, and like
N-Myc mutants [25] they exhibited complete syndactyly with boney fusions
(Fig. 8F and data not
shown).
Defects in endochondral growth and ossification caused by combined loss of
N-Myc and c-Myc
Both forelimb and hindlimb elements of dcko mice remained
extremely small throughout development and exhibited very small or no primary
ossification centers, suggesting persistent disruption of endochondral growth
and ossification. Because forelimb skeletal elements that formed in
dcko mice were extremely small and misshapen, we examined
endochondral growth and ossification on less severely affected hindlimb.
Histological analysis of E18.5 proximal tibia sections from
dcko mice revealed a combination of architectural features
found in individual c-Myc and N-Myc cko mice
(Fig. 9IA,B). First, the
epiphyseal head, which encompasses the resting/progenitor zone of the growth
plate, was consistently reduced in size in both N-Myc mutants
and dcko mice, but not in c-Myc mutants (Fig. 9IA–D – green
dashed line). Second, the characteristic narrow and constricting growth plate
from the proliferating zone to the ossification center of c-Myc
mutants was present in dcko mice, but not in
N-Myc mutants (Fig. 9IA–D'). While chondrocytes in the growth plates of
individual Myc dcko mutants differentiated into
ColXa1-positive hypertrophic cells, the reduced numbers of
chondrocytes in the prehypertrophic/hypertrophic region, particularly in
c-Myc mutant and dcko growth plates,
corresponded to markedly reduced levels of Ihh, Runx2, Vegfa
(Fig. 9IIA–L).
Moreover, decreased vascularization of the perichondrium and ossification front
correlated with reduced Vegfa levels in c-Myc
and dcko mutants. (Fig. 9IIM–O). As in c-Myc mutants (Fig.6B), these effects
corresponded to severely reduced pRpCTD in dcko growth plate
and perichondrium (Fig. S3). Suppressed pRpCTD at these
locations in the hindlimb tissues analysed is primarily attributed to loss of
c-Myc since c-Myc and not N-Myc is expressed
at these sites and relative to Prx1-Cre deletion of
N-Myc in the forelimb (early limb bud deletion),
Prx1-Cre deletion of N-Myc in the hindlimb (late
limb bud deletion) results in a less hypoplastic skeleton.
Unique and additive contributions of N-Myc and
c-Myc to endochondral growth and
ossification.
(IA–D') Histological comparison of E18.8 proximal tibia of
N-Myc, c-Myc and
dcko mutant embryos. Green dashed lines outline the
epiphyseal head regions and higher magnification views of the
black-boxed regions are shown (A'–D'). Arrow in
dcko image (D) indicates fusion between
tibia/fibula and femur. (E–H) Combined ColXa1 immunohistochemistry
(green) and Col1 in situ hybridization (dark blue) at
E18.5. (II) In situ hybridization of Ihh (A–D),
Runx2 (E–H) and Vegfa
(I–L) and PECAM immunohistochemistry (M–P) in tibia sections
at E18.5 from the indicated mouse strains. Yellow boxed regions in M-P
are shown in M'–P'.Finally, whereas N-Myc deficiency alone decreased the size of
the epiphyseal head of the tibia (and other limb elements – not shown),
and resulted in small declines in expression of Ihh,
Runx2, Vegfa in the growth plate, it had a
relatively strong effect on Col1 and Runx2
expression in the perichondrium, and on the thickness of perichondrium (Fig. 9IB, B', F, 9IIF).
c-Myc deficiency also resulted in a thin perichondrium and
reduced perichondrial expression of Col1 and
Runx2 (Fig.
9IC, C', F, 9IIG). Consistent with both c-Myc and N-Myc
contributing to osteoblast development, Col1 and
Runx2 were further reduced in dcko
mutants, which had very little identifiable perichondrial tissue (Fig. 9ID, D',
9IIH,L).
Discussion
In this study we show that c-Myc and N-Myc function cooperatively to drive limb
development. Together with previous studies on the role of N-Myc in limb development
[25], [3], our data
support a model in which N-Myc plays an important role in limb bud outgrowth and
production of mesenchymal cells that give rise to chondrocyte and osteoblast
progenitors, while c-Myc participates in the proliferative expansion of these latter
cells (Fig. 10). Moreover, c-Myc
appears to be particularly important in the growth plate, where it controls bone
size by regulating the transition of resting chondrocytes to proliferating
chondrocytes and therefore the ultimate number of cells that become mature
chondrocytes.
Figure 10
Model for the combined actions of N-Myc and c-Myc during limb
development.
N-Myc expression in the early limb bud promotes expansion of
undifferentiated multipotent mesenchymal cells. As the limb bud expands,
secreted factors from the ectoderm (e.g. FGF and Wnt family members) that
promote N-Myc expression and proliferation in underlying
mesenchyme can no longer reach the most central cells and these cells exit
the cell cycle and are fated to become Sox9-positive
chondro-osteoprogenitors [3]. In addition to cell cycle exit, the hypoxic
environment and Hif1α upregulation [44]
appears to participate in fate determination steps that initiate the
Sox9-positive chondrocyte and
Runx2-positive osteoblast lineages. The commencement of
low-level c-Myc expression in these lineages is proposed to
promote their proliferative expansion, but maintain their multipotent
progenitor character. Subsequent elaboration of the growth plate in
cartilage anlagen leads to the regional partitioning of
c-Myc expression where it acts as part of a program to
mobilize resting chondrocytes to proliferate and commit to the chondrocyte
terminal differentiation program. Although c-Myc expression in perichondrial
osteoblasts likely contributes to their proliferation, by controlling the
number of hypertrophic chondrocytes produced, c-Myc
impinges on the production of critica l factors produced from these cells
that also promotes osteoblast development and endochondral ossification.
Model for the combined actions of N-Myc and c-Myc during limb
development.
N-Myc expression in the early limb bud promotes expansion of
undifferentiated multipotent mesenchymal cells. As the limb bud expands,
secreted factors from the ectoderm (e.g. FGF and Wnt family members) that
promote N-Myc expression and proliferation in underlying
mesenchyme can no longer reach the most central cells and these cells exit
the cell cycle and are fated to become Sox9-positive
chondro-osteoprogenitors [3]. In addition to cell cycle exit, the hypoxic
environment and Hif1α upregulation [44]
appears to participate in fate determination steps that initiate the
Sox9-positive chondrocyte and
Runx2-positive osteoblast lineages. The commencement of
low-level c-Myc expression in these lineages is proposed to
promote their proliferative expansion, but maintain their multipotent
progenitor character. Subsequent elaboration of the growth plate in
cartilage anlagen leads to the regional partitioning of
c-Myc expression where it acts as part of a program to
mobilize resting chondrocytes to proliferate and commit to the chondrocyte
terminal differentiation program. Although c-Myc expression in perichondrial
osteoblasts likely contributes to their proliferation, by controlling the
number of hypertrophic chondrocytes produced, c-Myc
impinges on the production of critica l factors produced from these cells
that also promotes osteoblast development and endochondral ossification.
c-Myc regulation of endochondral growth and ossification
In many respects, the dynamics of growth plate function and endochondral
ossification resembles that of other homeostatic tissues such as skin and gut
epithelium and the hematopoetic system [37]. In these latter settings,
c-Myc and/or N-Myc play prominent roles in regulating the maintenance and
expansion of resident stem cells as well as their commitment towards more
differentiated cell types. This is probably most apparent in the skin where
c-Myc upregulation is associated with the transition from slow-dividing
keratinocyte stem cells to highly proliferative transit-amplifier cells, whose
multiplication is needed to meet the requirements of an organ that is
continuously sloughing off terminally differentiated cells [38]. While endochondral bone
growth is finite, the role of c-Myc in producing differentiated chondrocytes
during this process appears to provide an analogous function. After the initial
formation of cartilage, c-Myc promotes endochondral bone growth by stimulating
largely quiescent chondrocytes within the reserve zone to proliferate in
conjunction with their commitment to the chondrocyte differentiation program. As
a result, c-Myc appears to alter the architecture of the growth plate and
control endochondral ossification and the ultimate size of bones by regulating
the number of terminally differentiated chondrocytes produced. While the
detailed mechanism by which c-Myc regulates chondrocyte proliferation remains
unclear, we show that transcription initiation by RNA PolII, as marked by
phosphorylation of its CTD, is strongly upregulated in proliferating
chondrocytes where c-Myc is expressed (Fig. 6B, Fig. S3).
Moreover, the failure of pCTD to be upregulated and an apparent reduction in
expression of various important regulators of growth plate function in the
absence of c-Myc is consistent with the notion that Myc broadly affects the
transcriptional state of cells and that a Myc-induced hypertranscriptional state
is associated with, and perhaps necessary for, stimulating and maintaining high
levels of cell proliferation [36]. Moreover, the
striking reduction in pCTD in limb bud mesenchyme of Prx1-Cre
N-Myc mutants suggests that N-Myc and c-Myc have the same general
effect on global gene transcription.While c-Myc promotes chondrocyte proliferation in the growth plate, our data
indicate that it also influences proliferation in the perichondrium and is
required for efficient production of osteoblasts. c-Myc is
expressed in a ring pattern around the core of the limb bud at E11.5 and in
perichondrium of cartilage anlagen at E13.5 (Fig. 1D), locations where osteoblast
progenitors are thought to first arise and expand in number respectively [5], [21]. Moreover,
perichondrial c-Myc expression at E16.5 appears to overlap with
expression of Ptch-1 and Pthr1 (Fig. 6A), which are
well-established regulators of osteoblast proliferation [, [8.
However the finding that Osx1-Cre deletion of
c-Myc resulted in no discernable skeletal phenotype (Fig. S2 and
data not shown), suggests that any cell autonomous role of
c-Myc in osteoblast proliferation and behavior must take
place prior to Osx1-related activities that are involved in
osteoblast differentiation [8]. Indeed, the finding that c-Myc is
upregulated and proliferation is induced in osteoblasts upon deletion of
Osx1
[39] supports
the idea that Osx1 functions at post-mitotic stages in the osteoblast
differentiation program at least in part by suppressing c-Myc expression.Although our results implicate c-Myc in the control of osteoblast development, a
potential cell non-autonomous role for c-Myc in regulating
osteoblast proliferation and behavior may be linked to its control of
chondrocyte proliferation and the number of differentiated chondrocytes produced
in the growth plate. This is because the transition from proliferating
chondrocytes to prehypertrophic chondrocytes coincides with expression of
factors such as Runx2, Vegfa, and
Ihh, whose activities help coordinate chondrocyte
proliferation and differentiation during endochondral ossification [8]. Whereas
Ihh influences chondrocyte proliferation and osteoblast proliferation and/or
survival through binding its receptor Ptch-1 in the growth plate and
perichondrium respectively, Vegfa stimulates vascularization of the cartilage
template and hence migration of osteoblasts to the ossification front [8]. Since Ihh
plays an important role in maintaining chondrocyte proliferation, the reduced
number of Ihh producing prehypertrophic chondrocytes in
c-Myc mutants and the apparent reduction in
Ihh expression in those cells (Fig. 6C, C' and Fig. 8B, C) is predicted to further diminish
both chondrocyte and osteoblast proliferation. Indeed, it is possible that Ihh
requires c-Myc to promote or maintain chondrocyte proliferation
and the production of an appropriate number of prehypertrophic chondrocytes
expressing Ihh, as well as Runx2,
Vegfa and other factors that play critical roles in
endochondral growth and ossification. The production of fewer prehypertrophic
chondrocytes in the absence of c-Myc may therefore be
responsible for a cascade of secondary events that both further reduce the
number of chondrocytes and osteoblasts in developing bones and diminish the
ability of those produced to participate in endochondral ossification.
Coordination of limb skeletal development through sequential N-Myc and c-Myc
expression
The role of N-Myc in limb skeletal development appears to primarily be involved
in promoting the expansion of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells in the limb bud
that will contribute to formation of the precartilaginous condensation from
which chondro-osteoprogenitors develop [25], [3]. Results shown here
suggest that the activities are related to global effects on initiation of gene
transcription (Fig. 7IIC,D).
However, N-Myc may not have a uniform effect on condensation formation or
chondro-osteoprogenitors since its deletion has a preferential effect on
proximal elements, which was particularly evident in the dcko
mice (Fig. 7V, VI, Fig. 8). Interestingly,
N-Myc expression is fairly uniform in distal limb bud
mesenchyme as the limb bud emerges, but then develops a strong lateral bias
around E11.5 [25]. Thus, the relatively strong affect
N-Myc deficiency has on the development of proximal
elements may reflect a role for N-Myc in sustaining the
production of cells that preferentially contribute to the prospective proximal
region of the nascent condensation. Since retinoic acid signaling controls
formation of the proximal limb skeletal elements [2], N-Myc may be involved in
either regulating or mediating retinoic signaling in this setting. Further
characterization of proximal limb development and segmentation in
N-Myc and dcko mutants may help illuminate
a potential role for N-Myc in retinoic acid signaling and how undifferentiated
mesenchyme contributes to the regional specification and growth of the
developing limb skeleton.Genetic swap experiments indicate that N-Myc and
c-Myc are functionally redundant during development [40], raising
the question of why there is a transition from N-Myc expression
in undifferentiated limb bud mesenchyme to c-Myc expression in
chondrocyte and osteoblast lineages? In the developing limb, this transition
coincides with a shift from highly proliferative undifferentiated mesenchyme
that strongly express N-Myc, to the largely non-proliferative
precartilaginous condensation at the core of the limb bud where
N-Myc is no longer expressed [25], [3] and where
c-Myc expression appears to surround (Fig. 1B, H). Therefore, one possibility is
that the absence of both N-Myc and c-Myc proteins in the central core of the
limb bud and a concomitant exit from the cell cycle of its residents serves as
part of a mechanism that leads to the development of chondrocyte and osteoblast
lineages. Consistent with this idea, preliminary data from mice in which ectopic
c-Myc expression was targeted specifically to
Sox9-expressing cells of the precartilaginous condensation
show poor formation of the early cartilage template and defects in endochondral
ossification that leads to short skeletal elements (Z-Q.Z, C-Y.S and P.J.H.,
unpublished). Thus, given the well-established role of Myc in promoting and
maintaining the pluripotent or multipotent character of stem and progenitor
populations and the ability of forced Myc expression to suppress cell fate
transitions and cell differentiation [24], [23], [41], a transient period of
low/no Myc expression and associated cell cycle exit may facilitate epigenetic
reprogramming events and related changes in gene expression required for
promoting and/or fixing new cell fates, including expression of Sox9 and
development of chondro-osteoprogenitors in condensing mesenchyme of the limb
bud. Interestingly, even though either N-Myc or
c-Myc are expressed in most if not all proliferating cell
types [42],
[27], they
are rarely expressed in the same cells and switching from expression of one
Myc gene to another appears to be a common event associated
with various developmental transitions during organogenesis and in homeostatic
tissues [37].
Thus, while providing essentially the same activity, the unique (but potentially
partially overlapping) transcriptional codes of N-Myc and
c-Myc may have evolved to facilitate and coordinate
developmental transitions that incorporate, and presumably require, a transient
exit from the cell cycle. Understanding these codes may provide insight not only
into the underlying mechanisms that drive various critical developmental
transitions, but also into how to manipulate the expression of Myc proteins in
vivo to facilitate the therapeutic proliferative expansion of specific
progenitor populations in injury and disease settings.
Materials and Methods
Mice
c-Myc-floxed mice [30] were mated with
Prx1-Cre mice (Logan et al. 2002), Osx1
-Cre mice [33] and Sox9-Cre
[5] on a
mixed background of C57BL/6 and 129. c-Myc-floxed mice were
mated with N-Myc-floxed mice [43] and
Prx1-Cre mice to generate double conditional knockout mice.
All mice were maintained and used in accordance with animal protocols approved
by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee.
Histological analysis
Alcian blue, Alizarin red staining and von Kossa staining were performed using
standard procedures. To examine detailed bone architecture (Fig. 8A–D), limbs were fixed with
1.5% glutaraldehyde/1.5 paraformaldehyde in DMEM w/0.6% Ruthenium
hexamine trichloride overnight at 4 degrees followed by 3 changes of DMEM
containing 0.6% RHT over 15 minutes. Tibias were dissected out, osmicated
for 90 min in 1% OsO4 w/0.6% RHT in DMEM, rinsed in DMEM,
dehydrated from 30 to 100% EtOH, rinsed in propylene oxide and
infiltrated in Spurr's epoxy (microwave assisted). Samples were cut and
stained using the epoxy tissue stain from EMS (Charleston SC).
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
Embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight and
processed for whole mount in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-UTP-labeled
probes or embedded in OTC and sectioned before hybridization as previously
described (Brent et al. 2003). For immunohistochemistry, limb sections were
incubated with the following primary antibodies: anti-phospho-Rpb1 CTD - Cell
Signaling, Danvers, MA, anti-CD31(PECAM) - BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, Type X
collagen - Dr. William Horton), followed by incubations with Alexa
Flour-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) or DAB staining
using the Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, (Burlingame CA) as previously
described [25].
BrdU incorporation and TUNEL assays
BrdU (Sigma) labeling (1.5 hr) was performed using BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA)
BrdU In Situ Detection Kit as previously described [25]. Anti-BrdU stained sections
were counterstained with Hematoxylin. TUNEL was performed on fixed sections
using the Roche (Basal, Switzerland) In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit. The
percentage of BrdU positive cells was determined from counts of total cell
numbers within comparable regions of sectioned limb buds or proximal tibia.
Counts were determined from at least three serial sections from two or more
independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical
significance of differences was calculated using Student's
t-test.
Cell density measurements
Cell density measurements were made from within equivalent areas of proliferative
and hypertrophic zones. The specific regions selected were identified by their
characteristic cell morphology, as well as by BrdU labeling of serial sections
and ColX staining. DAPI stained sections from at least five different tibias
were used in these calculations. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and
statistical significance of differences were calculated using Student's
t-test.Limb skeletal phenotype of mice with
deletion of
. (A) Alcian
blue/Alizarin red staining of forelimb skeletal elements at E15.5 and (B)
Alcian blue and H&E staining of E15.5 proximal tibia sections.
Comparison of Alcian blue/Alizarin red staining of forelimb skeletal
elements at E18.5 of the indicated mouse strains is shown.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.deletion of
has little or no
effect on endochondral ossification and growth. (A) Alcian blue
and Alizarin red skeletal preparations of the indicated mice at E18.5 mice.
(B) Isolated hindlimbs E18.5 mice. (C) Alcian blue and H&E staining of
proximal tibia sections.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.Immunohistochemical analysis of RNA Polymerase CTD phosphorylation in
E18.5 tibias of the indicated mouse strains. Approximate
locations of the Resting (RZ), Proliferative (PZ), Prehypertrophic (PHZ) and
Hypertrophic Zones (HZ) are shown. Higher magnification images of the boxed
regions are shown on the right.(TIFF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Haruhiko Akiyama; Marie-Christine Chaboissier; James F Martin; Andreas Schedl; Benoit de Crombrugghe Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Kazuhisa Nakashima; Xin Zhou; Gary Kunkel; Zhaoping Zhang; Jian Min Deng; Richard R Behringer; Benoit de Crombrugghe Journal: Cell Date: 2002-01-11 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Elazar Zelzer; William McLean; Yin-Shan Ng; Naomi Fukai; Anthony M Reginato; Stephanie Lovejoy; Patricia A D'Amore; Bjorn R Olsen Journal: Development Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Gabriel R Cavalheiro; Gabriel E Matos-Rodrigues; Yilin Zhao; Anielle L Gomes; Deepti Anand; Danilo Predes; Silmara de Lima; Jose G Abreu; Deyou Zheng; Salil A Lachke; Ales Cvekl; Rodrigo A P Martins Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Benjamin H Mullin; Cyril Mamotte; Richard L Prince; Tim D Spector; Frank Dudbridge; Scott G Wilson Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 2.797