Literature DB >> 21493685

The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Elpida Fragouli1, Samer Alfarawati, N-Neka Goodall, Jorge F Sánchez-García, Pere Colls, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

Female meiosis is comprised by two cell divisions, meiosis I (MI) and II (MII) and two different stages at which the development of the oocyte is temporarily halted. In the case of MI, this pause can potentially last for four to five decades. This added layer of complexity distinguishes female gametogenesis from its male counterpart. The single most important genetic factor impacting human reproductive success is aneuploidy. Aneuploid embryos may undergo permanent arrest during preimplantation development, fail to implant or spontaneously abort. Most aneuploidies originate during female meiosis and become increasingly common with advancing maternal age. To shed further light on the nature of aneuploidy in human oocytes, we utilized comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to provide a detailed cytogenetic analysis of 308 first and second polar bodies (PBs). These were biopsied from fertilized oocytes, generated by 70 reproductively older women (average maternal age of 40.8 years). The total oocyte abnormality rate was 70%, and MII anomalies predominated over MI (50% aneuploidy rate versus 40.3%). Both whole chromosome non-disjunction and unbalanced chromatid predivision were seen, but the latter was the dominant MI aneuploidy-causing mechanism. Chromosome losses occurred more frequently than chromosome gains, especially during MI. Chromosomes of all sizes were found to participate in aneuploidy events, although errors involving smaller chromosomes were more common. These data reveal the spectrum of aneuploidies arising after each meiotic division, indicating that oocyte-derived abnormalities present at conception differ from those observed in established pregnancies. It is also clear that advancing maternal age had a significant adverse effect on female meiosis, and that this effect is most pronounced in MII. Indeed, our data suggest that MII may be more susceptible to age-related errors than MI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21493685     DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gar024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod        ISSN: 1360-9947            Impact factor:   4.025


  42 in total

1.  Polar body morphology is not predictive of its cell division origin.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott; Jing Su; Jessyca Campos; John Stevens; William Schoolcraft; Mandy Katz-Jaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Mouse Polar Bodies, Oocytes, and Embryos.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Reduced ability to recover from spindle disruption and loss of kinetochore spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in oocytes from aged mice.

Authors:  Yan Yun; Janet E Holt; Simon I R Lane; Eileen A McLaughlin; Julie A Merriman; Keith T Jones
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Rehabilitating human oocytes by polar body transplantation.

Authors:  David F Albertini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The frequency of precocious segregation of sister chromatids in mouse female meiosis I is affected by genetic background.

Authors:  Anna Danylevska; Kristina Kovacovicova; Thuraya Awadova; Martin Anger
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem.

Authors:  So I Nagaoka; Terry J Hassold; Patricia A Hunt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Souraya Jaroudi; Jonas Sarasa; Maria Enciso; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Chromosomal disorders and male infertility.

Authors:  Gary L Harton; Helen G Tempest
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors.

Authors:  Ron Hochstenbach; Beata Nowakowska; Marianne Volleth; Amber Ummels; Anna Kutkowska-Kaźmierczak; Ewa Obersztyn; Kamila Ziemkiewicz; Claudia Gerloff; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Petra Muschke; Ina Schanze; Martin Poot; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.