Literature DB >> 19411497

Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond.

Sheila Sprague1, Laura Quigley, Mohit Bhandari.   

Abstract

We provide an overview of survey design and implementation strategies in orthopaedic surgery. Health-care surveys are vital for obtaining information on the beliefs, patterns of practice, attitudes, and behaviors of orthopaedic surgeons. It is important to obtain a high response rate from administered surveys to reduce bias due to nonresponse. Researchers should follow the guidelines provided by this review to increase the response rate of orthopaedic surgeons to surveys. When designing these surveys, the researcher must consider length, format, and aesthetics. In addition, the types of questions that are included, the wording of these questions, and the order in which the questions are presented within the survey need to be carefully considered. Surveys can be administered by telephone, mail, facsimile (fax), and electronically by e-mail or Internet. The use of a mixed-mode method is recommended to improve the response rate. To increase the response rate to surveys that are directed at health professionals, a number of strategies have been suggested, including using cover letters, personalizing the cover letter and survey package, pretesting the cover letter and survey, contacting the surgeons prior to administration of the survey, contacting the surgeons multiple times, using stamped return envelopes in mail surveys, using appropriate survey packaging styles, providing incentives, and ensuring that the orthopaedic surgeon recognizes the sender of the survey. The costs associated with each administration method are briefly discussed, and ethical considerations are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411497     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Orrin I Franko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Enhancing response rates in physician surveys: the limited utility of electronic options.

Authors:  Keith Nicholls; Kathryn Chapman; Thomas Shaw; Allen Perkins; Margaret Murray Sullivan; Susan Crutchfield; Eddie Reed
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  How to assess a survey in surgery.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari; Charlie H Goldsmith
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Results of the PeRception of femOroaCetabular impingEment by Surgeons Survey (PROCESS).

Authors:  O R Ayeni; E L Belzile; V Musahl; D Naudie; S Crouch; S Sprague; M Bhandari
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy A Plerhoples; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-12-13

6.  Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Robert V O'Toole; Andrew N Pollak; Julius A Bishop; Christopher M McAndrew; Samir Mehta; William W Cross; Grant E Garrigues; Mitchel B Harris; Christopher T Lebrun
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  A dutch survey on circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Alexander F W Barnaart; Cees C P M Verheyen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-06-22

8.  Evidence of Selection Bias and Non-Response Bias in Patient Satisfaction Surveys.

Authors:  Jocelyn Compton; Natalie Glass; Timothy Fowler
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

9.  Development of an orthopedic surgery trauma patient handover checklist.

Authors:  Justin LeBlanc; Tyrone Donnon; Carol Hutchison; Paul Duffy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Success after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a Delphi-based international multidisciplinary consensus.

Authors:  Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Carlos A Higuera; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.