Literature DB >> 33717895

Obesity does not influence acetabular component accuracy when using a 3D optical computer navigation system.

Mohamad Sharan1, Alex Tang1, Lauren Schoof1, Alexander Gaukhman1, Morteza Meftah1, Peter Sculco2, Ran Schwarzkopf1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Improper cup positioning and leg length discrepancy (LLD) are two of the most common errors following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are associated with potentially significant consequences. Obesity is associated with increased risk of mechanical complications, including dislocations, which may be secondary to cup malposition and failure to restore leg length and offset. 3D Optical Camera computerassisted navigation (CAN) system may reduce the risk of component malposition and LLD with real time intraoperative feedback. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of CAN influences acetabular component placement (CP) accuracy and leg length restoration in obese (body mass index(BMI)≥35kg/m 2 ) patients undergoing primary THA.
METHODS: A multi-center retrospective review was conducted identifying consecutive THA cases with BMI > 35kg/m 2 using CAN (Intellijoint Hip, Waterloo, CA) from 2015-2019. These patients were then matched with patients undergoing conventional THA (control) at a 1:1 ratio according to BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and gender. TraumaCad™ software (Brainlab, Chicago, IL) was used to measure cup anteversion, inclination, and change (Δ) in LLD between pre- and postoperative radiographic images. The safety target zones used as reference for precision analysis of CP were 15°-30° for anteversion and 30°-50° for inclination.
RESULTS: 176 patients were included: 88 CAN and 88 control cases. CAN cases were found to have a lower ΔLLD than controls (3.53±2.12mm vs. 5.00±4.05mm; p=0.003). Additionally, more CAN cases fell within the target safe zone than controls (83% vs.60%, p=0.00083).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the use of a CAN system may be more precise in component placement, and useful in facilitating the successful restoration of preoperative leg length following THA than conventional methodology.
© 2020 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33717895      PMCID: PMC7919980          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  26 in total

1.  Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano; Hidenobu Miki; Tsuyoshi Koyama; Masaki Takao; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Ernst Sendtner; Tibor Schuster; Michael Wörner; Thomas Kalteis; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rainer Biedermann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A Cadaver Study to Evaluate the Accuracy of a New 3D Mini-Optical Navigation Tool for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Michael B Cross; Eric A Bogner; Theodore T Miller; Jeffrey M Muir; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2017-07-25

6.  Acetabular cup placement in navigated and non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA): results of two consecutive series using a cementless short stem.

Authors:  Yingyong Suksathien; Rachawan Suksathien; Porameth Chaiwirattana
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2014-06

7.  Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Intellijoint HIP®: a 3D mini-optical navigation tool for improving intraoperative accuracy during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-18

9.  A Smart Tool for Intraoperative Leg Length Targeting in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Paul Grosso; Matthew Snider; Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-09-30

10.  Minimal Increase in Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Procedural Time with the Use of a Novel Surgical Navigation Tool.

Authors:  Alexander Christ; Danielle Ponzio; Michael Pitta; Kaitlin Carroll; Jeffrey M Muir; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-09-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  The accuracy of component positioning during revision total hip arthroplasty using 3D optical computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Alex Tang; Vivek Singh; Mohamad Sharan; Mackenzie A Roof; John J Mercuri; Morteza Meftah; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-09-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.