Literature DB >> 21479836

Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics.

Mats Johansson1, Linus Broström.   

Abstract

Research on incompetent humans raises ethical challenges, especially when there is no direct benefit to these research subjects. Contemporary codes of research ethics typically require that such research must specifically serve to benefit the population to which the research subjects belong. The article critically examines this "same-population condition", raising issues of both interpretation and moral justification. Of particular concern is the risk that the way in which the condition is articulated and rationalized in effect disguises or downplays the instrumentalization of incompetent individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21479836     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-011-9324-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  10 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one.

Authors:  D Wendler
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research.

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler; Jack Killen; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  [Ethics Review Boards discriminate the most severely ill--Swedish researchers are prevented to participate in an international study].

Authors:  Martin Björck; Bengt Berg; Ulf Hedin; Urban Wingren
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2010 May 26-Jun 1

6.  Scientific research is a moral duty.

Authors:  John Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Surrogates have not been shown to make inaccurate substituted judgments.

Authors:  Linus Broström; Mats Johansson
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2009

8.  "What the patient would have decided": a fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard.

Authors:  Linus Broström; Mats Johansson; Morten Klemme Nielsen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006-11-21

9.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Coll Dent       Date:  2014
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Non-beneficial pediatric research: individual and social interests.

Authors:  Jan Piasecki; Marcin Waligora; Vilius Dranseika
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.