Literature DB >> 12816126

Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.

Loretta M Kopelman1.   

Abstract

The Maryland Court of Appeals in Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute was sharply critical of the lead abatement study conducted by this Institute, an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University. Grimes ruled that investigators might, given the facts of the case, have a special relationship with subjects, thereby creating a duty of care that could, if breached, give rise to an action in negligence. This ruling has implications for pediatric research practices and long-standing disputes among informed people of good will about what pediatric studies should be permitted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12816126     DOI: 10.1080/08989620214682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  2 in total

1.  Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions.

Authors:  David R Buchanan; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics.

Authors:  Mats Johansson; Linus Broström
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.