Literature DB >> 11758586

Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one.

D Wendler1.   

Abstract

Clinical research with adults who are unable to provide informed consent has the potential to improve understanding and care of a number of devastating conditions. This research also has the potential to exploit some of society's most vulnerable members. Recently, a number of task forces and individual writers have proposed guidelines to ensure that such research is both possible and ethical. Yet, there is widespread disagreement over which safeguards should be adopted. In the present paper, I consider to what extent these disagreements can be resolved by appeal to a general account of the interests of subjects who are unable to consent and the conditions that must be satisfied for research enrollment to constitute exploitation of their inability to make their own decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Mental Health Therapies

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11758586     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  7 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the question of placebo controls: ethical issues in psychopharmacological drug studies.

Authors:  Ellen Frank; Danielle M Novick; David J Kupfer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Does peer benefit justify research on incompetent individuals? The same-population condition in codes of research ethics.

Authors:  Mats Johansson; Linus Broström
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2012-08

3.  Issues with Consent in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  J P Mamo
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 0.171

4.  The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  K K Anderson; S D Mukherjee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Stroke genetic research and adults with impaired decision-making capacity: a survey of IRB and investigator practices.

Authors:  Donna T Chen; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Brown; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Impact of restricting enrollment in stroke genetics research to adults able to provide informed consent.

Authors:  Donna T Chen; L Douglas Case; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Brown; Scott L Silliman; James F Meschia; Bradford B Worrall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Surrogate consent to non-beneficial research: erring on the right side when substituted judgments may be inaccurate.

Authors:  Mats Johansson; Linus Broström
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2016-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.