Literature DB >> 21479738

Nonselective motor-level changes associated with selective response inhibition: evidence from response force measurements.

Yao-Ting Ko1, Jeff Miller.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the effects of selective response inhibition on motor production using response force measures within a task that was based on that of Aron and Verbruggen (Psychological Science, 19, 1146-1153, 2008). In each trial, participants were signaled to respond bimanually with the two index fingers or the two middle fingers. After a short delay, a stop signal was sometimes presented, indicating that one of the two finger responses should be withheld. A given response was slowed when the response on the other hand was stopped, replicating a previously observed stopping interference effect. In addition, the given response was also made more forcefully when the response on the other hand was stopped, indicating that the requirement to stop one activated response has global motor-level consequences for other responses that are to be carried out normally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21479738     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0090-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Selective inhibition of movement.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stop the presses: dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stopping.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

3.  Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations.

Authors:  Michael P Claffey; Sarah Sheldon; Cathy M Stinear; Frederick Verbruggen; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Michael G H Coles; Gordon D Logan; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Force and the motor cortex.

Authors:  J Ashe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.

Authors:  R De Jong; M G Coles; G D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cortical control and performance monitoring of interrupting and redirecting movements.

Authors:  Pierre Pouget; Aditya Murthy; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Signal-related contributions to stopping-interference effects in selective response inhibition.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Voluntarily-generated unimanual preparation is associated with stopping success: evidence from LRP and lateralized mu ERD before the stop signal.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Shih-Kuen Cheng; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-10

4.  Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task.

Authors:  Alison Hall; Ned Jenkinson; Hayley J MacDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 5.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  Current advances and pressing problems in studies of stopping.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; David C Godlove
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Effect of foreknowledge on neural activity of primary "go" responses relates to response stopping and switching.

Authors:  Benjamin Xu; Sarah Levy; John Butman; Dzung Pham; Leonardo G Cohen; Marco Sandrini
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Hayley J MacDonald; Angus J C McMorland; Cathy M Stinear; James P Coxon; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Classification of Movement and Inhibition Using a Hybrid BCI.

Authors:  Jennifer Chmura; Joshua Rosing; Steven Collazos; Shikha J Goodwin
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.650

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.