Literature DB >> 7790830

Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.

R De Jong1, M G Coles, G D Logan.   

Abstract

Motor inhibition was studied in 3 versions of the stop-signal paradigm, with the stop signal requiring inhibition of any response (stop-all), a fixed alternative response (stop-change), or selective inhibition of only 1 of the responses (selective-stop). The lateralized readiness potential was used in Experiment 1 to distinguish between a selective, central, and a global peripheral inhibition mechanism. Inhibition was found to be effected by the central mechanism in the stop-change condition and by the peripheral mechanism in the other conditions. Manipulation of stimulus discriminability in Experiment 2 strongly affected the speed of selective motor inhibition, confirming that such inhibition was achieved by conditionally engaging the peripheral mechanism. These results support the idea that functionally distinct mechanisms and strategies are involved in inhibitory motor control in different situations.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790830     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  74 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-13

3.  Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Functional parcellation of the inferior frontal and midcingulate cortices in a flanker-stop-change paradigm.

Authors:  Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Harald Kugel; Christo Pantev; René J Huster
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Manipulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors differentially affects behavioral inhibition in human subjects with and without disordered baseline impulsivity.

Authors:  Alexandra S Potter; David J Bucci; Paul A Newhouse
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Somatosensory effects of action inhibition: a study with the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Eamonn Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Variation in restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests relates to inhibitory control and shifting in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Susan Faja; Laura Nelson Darling
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2018-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.