Literature DB >> 9105577

Force and the motor cortex.

J Ashe1.   

Abstract

The relation between the activity of cells in the motor cortex and static force has been studied extensively. Most studies have concentrated on the relation to the magnitude of force; this relation is more or less monotonic. The slope of the relation, however, shows considerable variation among different studies and seems to be inversely associated with the range of forces over which the cell activity has been studied. Cells in the motor cortex also show variation in activity with the direction of static force. When both the direction and the magnitude of static force are allowed to vary, a majority of cells show significant changes in activity with direction of force alone, an intermediate number relate to both direction and magnitude, while a small number relate purely to the magnitude. This suggests that the direction of static force can be controlled independently of its magnitude and that this directional signal is especially prominent in the motor cortex. In general, it has been more difficult to study the relations to dynamic force. There is a correlation between motor cortex cell activity and the rate of change of force. The direction of dynamic force is also an important determinant of cell activity. When both static and dynamic force output are required (for example, with arm movement in the presence of gravity) it is the dynamic signal that is most clearly reflected in motor cortex activity. The relations between motor cortex activity and static or dynamic force are not invariant, but may be modified by the behavioral context of the motor output.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105577     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(96)00145-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Gerald V Smith; Larry Forrester; Jill Whitall; Richard F Macko; Till-Karsten Hauser; Andrew P Goldberg; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Common encoding of novel dynamic loads applied to the hand and arm.

Authors:  Paul R Davidson; Daniel M Wolpert; Stephen H Scott; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Age-related differences in stepping performance during step cycle-related removal of vision.

Authors:  G J Chapman; M A Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Nonselective motor-level changes associated with selective response inhibition: evidence from response force measurements.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

5.  Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women.

Authors:  Regis Radaelli; Cíntia E Botton; Eurico N Wilhelm; Martim Bottaro; Lee E Brown; Fabiano Lacerda; Anelise Gaya; Kelly Moraes; Amanda Peruzzolo; Ronei S Pinto
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-01-11

6.  Rapid acquisition of novel interface control by small ensembles of arbitrarily selected primary motor cortex neurons.

Authors:  Andrew J Law; Gil Rivlis; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Segregated and overlapping neural circuits exist for the production of static and dynamic precision grip force.

Authors:  Kristina A Neely; Stephen A Coombes; Peggy J Planetta; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  Basal ganglia contributions to motor control: a vigorous tutor.

Authors:  Robert S Turner; Michel Desmurget
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Partial inactivation of the primary motor cortex hand area: effects on individuated finger movements.

Authors:  M H Schieber; A V Poliakov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Past, present, and emerging principles in the neural encoding of movement.

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Claudia M Hendrix; Siavash Pasalar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.