Literature DB >> 18938282

Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms.

Jeff Miller1, Rolf Ulrich.   

Abstract

In three experiments we measured response time (RT) and peak force (PF) to investigate the grouping of left- and right-hand key press responses in a dual-task paradigm involving two independent go/no-go tasks. Within each task, a go stimulus within one of two modalities (i.e., visual versus auditory) required a response by one hand. In Experiment 1 with simultaneous go stimuli in the two tasks, responses appeared to be grouped in approximately 75-80% of trials, compared with nearly 100% grouping in a single-task condition requiring bimanual responses to the onset of any stimulus in either modality. In Experiment 2 with stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of 0-400 ms between the two go stimuli, response grouping clearly declined as SOA increased, although some grouping was still evident even at the longest SOA. The same pattern was observed in Experiment 3 with the same range of SOAs but unpredictable stimulus order, suggesting that grouping is not strongly dependent on prior knowledge of the likely response order. These results emphasize the pervasiveness of response grouping in bimanual dual-task RT paradigms and provide useful clues as to its nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18938282     DOI: 10.1080/17470210701434540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  11 in total

1.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociations of spatial congruence effects across response measures: an examination of delta plots.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Nora M Roüast
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-12

3.  Late backward effects in the refractory period paradigm: effects of Task 2 execution on Task 1 performance.

Authors:  Susana Ruiz Fernández; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-24

4.  Nonselective motor-level changes associated with selective response inhibition: evidence from response force measurements.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Ko; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

5.  Modulation of dual-task control with right prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Daria Antonenko; Maral Abbarin; Malvin Escher; Agnes Flöel; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Performance degradation and altered cerebral activation during dual performance: evidence for a bottom-up attentional system.

Authors:  Yunglin Gazes; Brian C Rakitin; Jason Steffener; Christian Habeck; Brady Butterfield; Claude Ghez; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Response-code conflict in dual-task interference and its modulation by age.

Authors:  Lya K Paas Oliveros; Aleks Pieczykolan; Rachel N Pläschke; Simon B Eickhoff; Robert Langner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-05

8.  Control of task sequences: what is the role of language?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Killian Kleffner-Canucci; Atsushi Kikumoto; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Anja Schütz; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-07

10.  Common Cognitive Control Processes Underlying Performance in Task-Switching and Dual-Task Contexts.

Authors:  Patricia Hirsch; Sophie Nolden; Mathieu Declerck; Iring Koch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.