Literature DB >> 11819046

Interaction between different sensory cues in the control of human gait.

Elodie Varraine1, Mireille Bonnard, Jean Pailhous.   

Abstract

This experiment investigates the interaction of different sensory cues in the control of propulsive forces in human gait which in turn allow the body's forward progression to be regulated. The aim of this work was to determine how optic flow and leg-somatosensory feedback interact in this control. We therefore determined whether the responses to sinusoidal perturbations of optic flow were accentuated when leg-somatosensory feedback was modified by varying the support resistance. Subjects walked on a treadmill which was driven by their own locomotor activity (1) with a sinusoidal variation of optic flow velocity, (2) with a sinusoidal variation of support resistance which modified leg-somatosensory information and (3) with both visual and leg-somatosensory modification at different frequencies. The response of the subject was measured as changes in speed and propulsive power. The response to sinusoidal perturbations of optic flow was found to be increased and time delayed when visual perturbations are coupled with support perturbations in comparison with the response observed with visual perturbations only. This result shows the influence of leg-somatosensory feedback on the weighting of optic flow. Inversely, it was also found that the motor response to support perturbation was different when the flow was congruent (i.e., corresponding to the subject's virtual speed) and when it was not. This latter result shows the influence of optic flow on the weighting of leg-somatosensory feedback. The interaction between optic flow and leg-somatosensory feedback argues in favor of a multimodal sensory control of propulsive forces. This multimodal sensory control would be based on all the sensory feedback and all their mutual sensorial interaction. Therefore, the modification of one sensory input modifies not only this input but also the integration of the other inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11819046     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0934-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Effects of optic flow speed and lateral flow asymmetry on locomotion in younger and older adults: a virtual reality study.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Chou; Robert C Wagenaar; Elliot Saltzman; J Erik Giphart; Daniel Young; Rosa Davidsdottir; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Coordination between upper- and lower-limb movements is different during overground and treadmill walking.

Authors:  Ilaria Carpinella; Paolo Crenna; Marco Rabuffetti; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Role of visual input in the control of dynamic balance: variability and instability of gait in treadmill walking while blindfolded.

Authors:  Fabienne Reynard; Philippe Terrier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cognitive load reduces the effects of optic flow on gait and electrocortical dynamics during treadmill walking.

Authors:  Brenda R Malcolm; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effects of implicit visual feedback distortion on human gait.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Kim; Hermano Igo Krebs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt.

Authors:  Jill C Slaboda; Richard T Lauer; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Jennifer L Campos; George S W Chan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual control of trunk translation and orientation during locomotion.

Authors:  E Anson; P Agada; T Kiemel; Y Ivanenko; F Lacquaniti; J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Subliminal stimuli in the near absence of attention influence top-down cognitive control.

Authors:  Dobromir A Rahnev; Elliott Huang; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke.

Authors:  Anouk Lamontagne; Joyce Fung; Bradford J McFadyen; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.