Literature DB >> 28449191

Perceived harms and benefits of tobacco, marijuana, and electronic vaporizers among young adults in Colorado: implications for health education and research.

Lucy Popova1, Emily Anne McDonald2, Sohrab Sidhu3, Rachel Barry4, Tracey A Richers Maruyama5, Nicolas M Sheon6, Pamela M Ling7.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate how young adults perceive and compare harms and benefits of marijuana and tobacco products in the context of a legal marijuana market in Colorado.
DESIGN: Semi-structured qualitative interviews.
SETTING: Denver, CO, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two young adults (aged 18-26 years) who used tobacco/marijuana/vaporizers. MEASUREMENTS: Semi-structured interviews addressed perceived harms and benefits of various tobacco and marijuana products and personal experiences with these products.
FINDINGS: Young adults evaluated harms and benefits using five dimensions: (1) combustion-smoking was considered more harmful than non-combustible products (e.g. e-cigarettes, vaporizers and edibles); (2) potency-edibles and marijuana concentrates were perceived as more harmful than smoking marijuana flower because of potential to receive too large a dose of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); (3) chemicals-products containing chemical additives were seen as more harmful than 'pure' or 'natural' plant products; (4) addiction-participants recognized physiological addiction to nicotine, but talked primarily about psychological or life-style dependence on marijuana; and (5) source of knowledge-personal experiences, warning labels, campaigns, the media and opinions of product retailers and medical practitioners affected perceptions of harms and benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults in Colorado, USA, perceived harms and benefits of tobacco and marijuana include multiple dimensions. Health educational campaigns could benefit from addressing these dimensions, such as the potency of nicotine and cannabis concentrates and harmful chemicals present in the organic material of tobacco and marijuana. Descriptors such as 'natural' and 'pure' in the promotion or packaging of tobacco and marijuana products might be misleading.
© 2017 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannabis; electronic cigarettes; perceived benefits; perceived harm; qualitative research; tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449191      PMCID: PMC5593776          DOI: 10.1111/add.13854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  36 in total

1.  Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis.

Authors:  David J Nutt; Leslie A King; Lawrence D Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Mass media campaigns designed to support new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship.

Authors:  Emily Brennan; Sarah J Durkin; Trish Cotter; Todd Harper; Melanie A Wakefield
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the USA.

Authors:  W Hall; M Weier
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife.

Authors:  Madeline H Meier; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richard S E Keefe; Kay McDonald; Aimee Ward; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The perceived health risks of cannabis use in an Australian household survey.

Authors:  Bianca Calabria; Wendy Swift; Tim Slade; Wayne Hall; Jan Copeland
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2012-03-04

6.  Adolescents' Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of Conventional Cigarettes, E-cigarettes, and Marijuana: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Maria L Roditis; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  A new method of cannabis ingestion: the dangers of dabs?

Authors:  Mallory Loflin; Mitch Earleywine
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Marijuana use and risk of lung cancer: a 40-year cohort study.

Authors:  Russell C Callaghan; Peter Allebeck; Anna Sidorchuk
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Awareness, trial, and current use of electronic cigarettes in 10 countries: Findings from the ITC project.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Mi Yan; Anne C K Quah; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; Sara C Hitchman; Ann McNeill; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Marc C Willemsen; Hong Gwan Seo; Yuan Jiang; Tania Cavalcante; Cristina Perez; Maizurah Omar; Karin Hummel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  One Minute of Marijuana Secondhand Smoke Exposure Substantially Impairs Vascular Endothelial Function.

Authors:  Xiaoyin Wang; Ronak Derakhshandeh; Jiangtao Liu; Shilpa Narayan; Pooneh Nabavizadeh; Stephenie Le; Olivia M Danforth; Kranthi Pinnamaneni; Hilda J Rodriguez; Emmy Luu; Richard E Sievers; Suzaynn F Schick; Stanton A Glantz; Matthew L Springer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  22 in total

1.  Vaporization of Marijuana Among Recreational Users: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Aston; Samantha G Farris; Jane Metrik; Rochelle K Rosen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.582

2.  Who are the smokers who never plan to quit and what do they think about the risks of using tobacco products?

Authors:  Lucy Popova; Ban Majeed; Daniel Owusu; Claire Adams Spears; David L Ashley
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Regulating Cannabis Manufacturing: Applying Public Health Best Practices from Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Daniel G Orenstein; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Psychiatric comorbidity in adolescent use and poly-use of combustible, vaporized, and edible cannabis products.

Authors:  Adam M Leventhal; Dayoung Bae; Afton Kechter; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.791

5.  International differences in patterns of cannabis use among adult cigarette smokers: Findings from the 2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Pete Driezen; Danielle M Smith; Ron Borland; Eric N Lindblom; David Hammond; Ann McNeill; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings; Gary Chan; Mary E Thompson; Christian Boudreau; Nadia Martin; Janine Ouimet; Ruth Loewen; Anne C K Quah; Maciej L Goniewicz; James F Thrasher; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-04-16

6.  Cannabis Vaping: Existing and Emerging Modalities, Chemistry, and Pulmonary Toxicology.

Authors:  Jiries Meehan-Atrash; Irfan Rahman
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  A Practice Theory Approach to Understanding Poly-Tobacco Use in the United States.

Authors:  Julia McQuoid; Emily Keamy-Minor; Pamela Ling
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Modes of delivery in concurrent nicotine and cannabis use ("co-use") among youth: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Survey.

Authors:  Danielle M Smith; Connor Miller; Richard J O'Connor; Lynn T Kozlowski; Elle Wadsworth; Brian V Fix; R Lorraine Collins; Binnian Wei; Maciej L Goniewicz; Andrew J Hyland; David Hammond
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  Mode of Marijuana Use among Young Adults: Perceptions, Use Profiles, and Future Use.

Authors:  Katelyn F Romm; Carly D West; Carla J Berg
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 10.  The importance of psychology for shaping legal cannabis regulation.

Authors:  Jacob T Borodovsky; Michael J Sofis; Richard A Grucza; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.