Michelle Jeong1,2, Seth M Noar3,4, Dongyu Zhang5, Jennifer R Mendel3, Robert P Agans6,7, Marcella H Boynton1,3, M Justin Byron8, Sabeeh A Baig1,3, Leah M Ranney8, Kurt M Ribisl1,3, Noel T Brewer1,3. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ. 3. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 5. Department of Oncology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 7. Carolina Survey Research Laboratory, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. 8. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration has increased communication efforts that aim to raise public awareness of the harmful constituents (ie, chemicals) in cigarette smoke. We sought to investigate whether the public's awareness of these chemicals has increased in light of such efforts. METHODS: Participants were national probability samples of 11 322 US adults and adolescents recruited in 2014-2015 (wave 1) and 2016-2017 (wave 2). Cross-sectional telephone surveys assessed awareness of 24 cigarette smoke chemicals at both timepoints. RESULTS: The proportion of US adults aware of cigarette smoke chemicals did not differ between waves 1 and 2 (25% and 26%, p = .19). In contrast, awareness of chemicals among adolescents fell from 28% to 22% (p < .001), mostly due to lower awareness of carbon monoxide, arsenic, benzene, and four other chemicals. Belief that most of the harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke come from burning the cigarette also fell from waves 1 to 2 (adults: 31% vs. 26%; adolescents: 47% vs. 41%, both ps < .05). Participants were more likely to be aware of cigarette smoke chemicals if they had been exposed to anti-smoking campaign advertisements (p < .05) or had previously sought chemical information (p < .05). Cigarette smoke chemical awareness did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: Awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals remains low and unchanged among adults and decreased somewhat among adolescents. The association of chemical awareness with information exposure via campaigns and information seeking behavior is promising. More concerted communication efforts may be needed to increase public awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals, which could potentially discourage smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Awareness of the toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke may contribute to quitting. The US Food and Drug Administration is making efforts to increase public awareness of these chemicals. Two national surveys (2014-2017) found that chemical awareness was low among adults and adolescents. Although awareness did not change among adults, awareness among adolescents dropped over time. In addition, exposure to anti-smoking campaigns and chemical information seeking behavior were associated with higher awareness of chemicals in cigarette smoke. Campaigns and other efforts may be needed to increase awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals.
INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration has increased communication efforts that aim to raise public awareness of the harmful constituents (ie, chemicals) in cigarette smoke. We sought to investigate whether the public's awareness of these chemicals has increased in light of such efforts. METHODS:Participants were national probability samples of 11 322 US adults and adolescents recruited in 2014-2015 (wave 1) and 2016-2017 (wave 2). Cross-sectional telephone surveys assessed awareness of 24 cigarette smoke chemicals at both timepoints. RESULTS: The proportion of US adults aware of cigarette smoke chemicals did not differ between waves 1 and 2 (25% and 26%, p = .19). In contrast, awareness of chemicals among adolescents fell from 28% to 22% (p < .001), mostly due to lower awareness of carbon monoxide, arsenic, benzene, and four other chemicals. Belief that most of the harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke come from burning the cigarette also fell from waves 1 to 2 (adults: 31% vs. 26%; adolescents: 47% vs. 41%, both ps < .05). Participants were more likely to be aware of cigarette smoke chemicals if they had been exposed to anti-smoking campaign advertisements (p < .05) or had previously sought chemical information (p < .05). Cigarette smoke chemical awareness did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers. CONCLUSION: Awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals remains low and unchanged among adults and decreased somewhat among adolescents. The association of chemical awareness with information exposure via campaigns and information seeking behavior is promising. More concerted communication efforts may be needed to increase public awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals, which could potentially discourage smoking. IMPLICATIONS: Awareness of the toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke may contribute to quitting. The US Food and Drug Administration is making efforts to increase public awareness of these chemicals. Two national surveys (2014-2017) found that chemical awareness was low among adults and adolescents. Although awareness did not change among adults, awareness among adolescents dropped over time. In addition, exposure to anti-smoking campaigns and chemical information seeking behavior were associated with higher awareness of chemicals in cigarette smoke. Campaigns and other efforts may be needed to increase awareness of cigarette smoke chemicals.
Authors: Kathryn E Moracco; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Mendel; Randall Teal; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Noel T Brewer; Jennifer C Morgan; Sabeeh A Baig; Jennifer R Mendel; Marcella H Boynton; Jessica K Pepper; M Justin Byron; Seth M Noar; Robert P Agans; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Bridget Kelly; Robert Hornik; Anca Romantan; J Sanford Schwartz; Katrina Armstrong; Angela DeMichele; Martin Fishbein; Stacy Gray; Shawnika Hull; Annice Kim; Rebekah Nagler; Jeff Niederdeppe; A Susana Ramírez; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Norman Wong Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2010-10
Authors: Kimberly D Wiseman; Jennifer Cornacchione; Kimberly G Wagoner; Seth M Noar; Kathryn E Moracco; Randall Teal; Mark Wolfson; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Li-Ling Huang; Allison J Lazard; Jessica K Pepper; Seth M Noar; Leah M Ranney; Adam O Goldstein Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jennifer C Duke; Tesfa N Alexander; Xiaoquan Zhao; Janine C Delahanty; Jane A Allen; Anna J MacMonegle; Matthew C Farrelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph G L Lee; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Jeffrey Gilbert; Leah M Ranney; Adam O Goldstein; Marcella H Boynton Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: Adam O Goldstein; Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kyung Su Kim; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Leah M Ranney Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Michelle T Bover Manderski; Michael B Steinberg; Olivia A Wackowski; Binu Singh; William J Young; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.390