Literature DB >> 12049321

Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?

Deborah M Saucier1, Sheryl M Green, Jennifer Leason, Alastair MacFadden, Scott Bell, Lorin J Elias.   

Abstract

When navigating, women typically focus on landmarks within the environment, whereas men tend to focus on the Euclidean properties of the environment. However, it is unclear whether these observed differences in navigational skill result from disparate strategies or disparate ability. To remove this confound, the present study required participants to follow either landmark- or Euclidean-based instructions during a navigation task (either in the real-world or on paper). Men performed best when using Euclidean information, whereas women performed best when using landmark information, suggesting a dimorphic capacity to use these 2 types of spatial information. Further, a significant correlation was observed between the mental rotation task and the ability to use Euclidean information, but not the ability to use landmark information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049321     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.3.403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  60 in total

1.  Predictors of virtual radial arm maze performance in adolescent Italian children.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Roberto Lucchini; David C Bellinger; Elaine Hoffman; Marco Nazzaro; Donald R Smith; Robert O Wright
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  Sex differences after environmental enrichment and physical exercise in rats when solving a navigation task.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; C A Rodríguez; J Sánchez; F Mármol
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Sex differences in spatial cognition in an invertebrate: the cuttlefish.

Authors:  Christelle Jozet-Alves; Julien Modéran; Ludovic Dickel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Age and sex differences in a virtual version of the reorientation task.

Authors:  Luciana Picucci; Alessandro O Caffò; Andrea Bosco
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

5.  Deadlines in space: Selective effects of coordinate spatial processing in multitasking.

Authors:  Ivo Todorov; Fabio Del Missier; Linn Andersson Konke; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

6.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

7.  What makes a landmark effective in adolescent and adult rats? Sex and age differences in a navigation task.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; M N Torres; C A Rodríguez; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: women excel and calories count.

Authors:  Joshua New; Max M Krasnow; Danielle Truxaw; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Estrogen therapy and cognition: a review of the cholinergic hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert B Gibbs
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  The Walking Corsi Test (WalCT): standardization of the topographical memory test in an Italian population.

Authors:  L Piccardi; F Bianchini; O Argento; A De Nigris; A Maialetti; L Palermo; C Guariglia
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.