Literature DB >> 21472107

Anterior resection for rectal carcinoma - risk factors for anastomotic leaks and strictures.

Ashok Kumar1, Ram Daga, Paari Vijayaragavan, Anand Prakash, Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Anu Behari, Vinay K Kapoor, Rajan Saxena.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the incidence and factors responsible for anastomotic leaks and stricture following anterior resection (AR) and its subsequent management.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data from 108 patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent AR or low anterior resection (LAR) to identify the various preoperative, operative, and post operative factors that might have influence on anastomotic leaks and strictures.
RESULTS: There were 68 males and 40 females with an average of 47 years (range 21-75 years). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 8 cm (range 3-15 cm). Sixty (55.6%) patients underwent handsewn anastomosis and 48 (44.4%) were stapled. The median operating time was 3.5 h (range 2.0-7.5 h). Sixteen (14.6%) patients had an anastomotic leak. Among these, 11 patients required re-exploration and five were managed expectantly. The anastomotic leak rate was similar in patients with and without diverting stoma (8/60, 13.4% with stoma and 8/48; 16.7% without stoma). In 15 (13.9%) patients, resection margins were positive for malignancy. Nineteen (17.6%) patients developed anastomotic strictures at a median duration of 8 mo (range 3-20 mo). Among these, 15 patients were successfully managed with per-anal dilatation. On multivariate analysis, advance age (> 60 years) was the only risk factor for anastomotic leak (P = 0.004). On the other hand, anastomotic leak (P = 0.00), mucin positive tumor (P = 0.021), and lower rectal growth (P = 0.011) were found as risk factors for the development of an anastomotic stricture.
CONCLUSION: Advance age is a risk factor for an anastomotic leak. An anastomotic leak, a mucin-secreting tumor, and lower rectal growth predispose patients to develop anastomotic strictures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Anterior resection; Rectal carcinoma; Stricture

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21472107      PMCID: PMC3070022          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i11.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

1.  Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  I Gastinger; F Marusch; R Steinert; S Wolff; F Koeckerling; H Lippert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients.

Authors:  A Köhler; S Athanasiadis; A Ommer; E Psarakis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from anus on rectal cancer treatment outcomes.

Authors:  P Terry Phang; John K MacFarlane; Robert H Taylor; Rona E Cheifetz; Noelle Davis; John H Hay; Greg McGregor; Caroline Speers; Barry J Sullivan; Janet Pitts; Andrew J Coldman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Suzana Angélica da Silva Lustosa; Delcio Matos; Alvaro Nagib Atallah; Aldemar Araujo Castro
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2002-09-02       Impact factor: 1.044

6.  Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Nesbakken; K Nygaard; O C Lunde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Anastomotic stricture with the EEA-Stapler after colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Marchena Gómez; E Ruiz de la Cuesta; G Gómez Guerra; I Vallejo Gallego; F García-Anguíano; J M Hernández Romero
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; P Michel; J Saric; M Parneix
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Frank Marusch; Andreas Koch; Uwe Schmidt; Sven Geibetaler; Henning Dralle; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Stefanie Wolff; Gerd Nestler; Matthias Pross; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The incidence and causes of permanent stoma after anterior resection.

Authors:  C M H Bailey; J M D Wheeler; M Birks; R Farouk
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  9 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic video-assisted (TEVA) excision.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Dominique Vande Maele; Javier Nieto; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Patients who failed endoscopic stenting for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction suffered the worst outcomes.

Authors:  Tian-Zhi Lim; Dedrick Chan; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Hyperbaric oxygen for anastomotic complications following low anterior resection: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Kenneth Loon; Simon Wilkins; Karen Oliva; Peter Carne; Andrew Fock; Geoff Frawley; Adrian Polglase; Paul McMurrick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paschalis Gavriilidis; Daniel Azoulay; Panos Taflampas
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Woong Bae Ji; Jung Myun Kwak; Jin Kim; Jun Won Um; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery based on a new prognostic index PROCOLE (prognostic colorectal leakage) developed from the meta-analysis of observational studies of risk factors.

Authors:  S A Rojas-Machado; M Romero-Simó; A Arroyo; A Rojas-Machado; J López; R Calpena
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Male gender is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak in rectal cancer patients after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Chi Zhou; Xian-Rui Wu; Xuan-Hui Liu; Yu-Feng Chen; Jia Ke; Xiao-Wen He; Xiao-Sheng He; Tuo Hu; Yi-Feng Zou; Xiao-Bin Zheng; Hua-Shan Liu; Jian-Cong Hu; Xiao-Jian Wu; Jian-Ping Wang; Ping Lan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2018-02-14

9.  Feasibility of endoscopic hand suturing on rectal anastomoses in ex vivo porcine models.

Authors:  Eriko Koizumi; Osamu Goto; Seiichi Shinji; Koki Hayashi; Tsugumi Habu; Kumiko Kirita; Hiroto Noda; Kazutoshi Higuchi; Takeshi Onda; Jun Omori; Teppei Akimoto; Mitsuru Kaise; Hiroshi Yoshida; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.