Literature DB >> 10859087

Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients.

A Köhler1, S Athanasiadis, A Ommer, E Psarakis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum.
METHODS: This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3 +/- 0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. COMPLICATIONS: Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). FOLLOW-UP: During the follow-up period of 6.8 +/- 3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n = 18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n = 4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n = 9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105 +/- 37 cm H2O and postoperative, 75 +/- 19 cm H2O; P < 0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change.
CONCLUSION: In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailment of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859087     DOI: 10.1007/bf02238025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  34 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  External coloanal anastomosis without covering stoma in low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ashraf Abdel-Azeem Mohamed; Abdel-Fatah Saleh Abdel-Fatah; Khaled Mohamed Mahran; Abo-Bakr Mohamed Mohie-Eldin
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

5.  Differences in tissue degeneration between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuji Nishizawa; Satoshi Fujii; Norio Saito; Masaaki Ito; Kentaro Nakajima; Atsushi Ochiai; Masanori Sugito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Frédéric Bretagnol; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Quor M Leong; Dong N Son; Jae S Cho; Se J Baek; Jung M Kwak; Azali H Amar; Seon H Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Dai Shida; Hiroki Ochiai; Junichi Mazaki
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Ueno; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Keiichi Ishikawa; Hajime Fujimoto; Eiji Shinto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Sphincter-sparing resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.