Literature DB >> 21466145

Vection aftereffects from expanding/contracting stimuli.

Takeharu Seno1, Hiroyuki Ito, Shoji Sunaga.   

Abstract

We presented three types of visual stimuli (blank, static and dynamic random dots) following optic flow stimuli and measured the durations of the motion aftereffects (MAEs) and aftereffects of vection (vection aftereffects, VAEs). The VAEs were induced in the direction opposite to the MAEs. However, the VAEs were not the same as the vection induced by the MAEs because the VAEs were sustained even after the MAEs vanished. In addition, when vection was facilitated or inhibited by the static dot plane in front or in the back of the optic flow, only the VAE strength was modulated, while the MAE was constant between the two conditions. From these results, we conclude that the vection-inducing mechanism shares some neural units with the motion processing mechanisms but has an additional aspect that adapts independently of the motion processing mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21466145     DOI: 10.1163/187847510x532667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seeing Perceiving


  18 in total

1.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Inhibition of vection by grasping an object.

Authors:  Masaki Mori; Takeharu Seno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Benjamin Arcioni; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Smoothness of stimulus motion can affect vection strength.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Fujii; Takeharu Seno; Robert S Allison
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Limited interaction between translation and visual motion aftereffects in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fore-aft translation aftereffects.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effects of local rotation on roll vection induced by globally rotating visual inducer.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

8.  Directionless vection: A new illusory self-motion perception.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Yuki Yamada; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-10-15

9.  Human Vection Perception Using Inertial Nulling and Certainty Estimation: The Effect of Migraine History.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Catherine J O'Leary; Paul D Allen; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of perceived speed in vection: does perceived speed modulate the jitter and oscillation advantages?

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.