Literature DB >> 21465234

His and para-His pacing in AV block: feasibility and electrocardiographic findings.

Mads Brix Kronborg1, Peter Thomas Mortensen, Jens Christian Gerdes, Henrik Kjaerulf Jensen, Jens Cosedis Nielsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Right ventricular apical pacing induces a dyssynchronous activation of the left ventricle and is associated with adverse clinical outcome. We aimed to establish permanent His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing in patients with high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block.
METHOD: We included patients with pacemaker indication due to second- or third-degree AV block, left ventricular ejection fraction >0.40, QRS duration <120 ms, and sinus rhythm. All patients received a pacemaker with one atrial lead, one right ventricular mid-septal lead, and one lead in the His bundle or in the para-His position. Pacing from apex was performed temporarily. Patients were followed for 12 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included (mean age, 67 ± 10 years; 30 (79%) male). Mean implantation time was 85 ± 31 min, mean fluoroscopy time was 23 ± 13 min, and mean position attempts of the His bundle lead was 8 ± 5. In four patients, we established direct His-bundle pacing with a mean QRS of 100 ± 19 ms, and in 28 patients, para-His pacing was achieved with a mean QRS of 112 ± 18 ms, and in six patients, neither direct His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing could be achieved. The mean QRS duration was 153 ± 12 ms with mid-septal pacing and 161 ± 15 ms with apical pacing.
CONCLUSION: Stable direct His-bundle pacing or para-His pacing is feasible in 85% of patients with narrow QRS and high-grade AV block and leads to a normal or near-normal ventricular activation pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21465234     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9565-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  22 in total

1.  Single-chamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block.

Authors:  William D Toff; A John Camm; J Douglas Skehan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block.

Authors:  Arnold C T Ng; Christine Allman; Jane Vidaic; Hui Tie; Andrew P Hopkins; Dominic Y Leung
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Electrical resynchronization induced by direct His-bundle pacing.

Authors:  Daniel L Lustgarten; Susan Calame; Eric M Crespo; James Calame; Robert Lobel; Peter S Spector
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the 'Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)' study.

Authors:  Reinhard C Funck; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Hans-Helge Mueller; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Christophe Bailleul; Bernhard Maisch
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  Biventricular pacing preserves left ventricular performance in patients with high-grade atrio-ventricular block: a randomized comparison with DDD(R) pacing in 50 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andi E Albertsen; Jens C Nielsen; Steen H Poulsen; Peter T Mortensen; Anders K Pedersen; Peter S Hansen; Henrik K Jensen; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael O Sweeney; Anne S Hellkamp; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Arnold J Greenspon; Roger A Freedman; Kerry L Lee; Gervasio A Lamas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Direct His bundle pacing preserves coronary perfusion compared with right ventricular apical pacing: a prospective, cross-over mid-term study.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; Enrico Bacchiega; Lucia Rampin; Sivio Aggio; Enrico Baracca; Gianni Pastore; Tiziana Marotta; Giorgio Corbucci; Loris Roncon; Domenico Rubello; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future.

Authors:  Pramod M Deshmukh; Mary Romanyshyn
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.

Authors:  H R Andersen; J C Nielsen; P E Thomsen; L Thuesen; P T Mortensen; T Vesterlund; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Direct His bundle and paraHisian cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; S S Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing.

Authors:  Mark Young Lee; Srinath Chilakamarri Yeshwant; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 4.  His Bundle Pacing: Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Physiological mechanisms of QRS narrowing in bundle branch block patients undergoing permanent His bundle pacing.

Authors:  Alexandra E Teng; Louis Massoud; Olujimi A Ajijola
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Right ventricular septal pacing: Safety and efficacy in a long term follow up.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Gianluca Quirino; Lara Baduena; Rosaria Nappo; Chiara Cavallino; Emanuela Facchini; Paolo Pistelli; Andrea Magnani; Miriam Bortnik; Gabriella Francalacci; Gabriele Dell'Era; Laura Plebani; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 7.  Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Khurrum Khan; Jitae A Kim; Andra Gurgu; Muzamil Khawaja; Dragos Cozma; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.947

8.  Benefits of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Combined With Atrioventricular Node Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Heart Failure With Both Preserved and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Weijian Huang; Lan Su; Shengjie Wu; Lei Xu; Fangyi Xiao; Xiaohong Zhou; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing in the Heart Failure Population.

Authors:  Justin Gould; Benjamin Sieniewicz; Bradley Porter; Baldeep Sidhu; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

10.  Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  JunMeng Zhang; Zefeng Wang; Liting Cheng; Linna Zu; Zhuo Liang; Fei Hang; Xinlu Wang; Xiaoyan Li; Ruijuan Su; Jie Du; Yongquan Wu
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.