Literature DB >> 15189517

Direct His-bundle pacing: present and future.

Pramod M Deshmukh1, Mary Romanyshyn.   

Abstract

Direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) produces rapid sequential multisite synchronous ventricular activation and, therefore, would be an ideal alternative to right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing. In 54 patients with cardiomyopathy, ejection fraction (EF) 0.23 +/- 0.11, persistent atrial fibrillation, and normal QRS < 120 ms. DHBP was attempted. This was successful in 39 patients. In seven patients, the effect of increasing heart rate on contractility (Treppe effect) was investigated. Twelve patients who also received a RVA lead underwent cardiopulmonary testing. After a mean follow-up of 42 months, 29 patients are still alive with EF improving from 0.23 +/- 0.11 to 0.33 +/- 0.15. Functional class improved from 3.5 to 2.2. DP/dt increased at each pacing site (P < 0.05) as the heart rate increased to 60, 100, and 120 beats/min. Rise in dP/dt by DHBP pacing at 120 beats/min was at least 170 +/- mmHg/s, greater than any other site in the ventricle (P < 0.05). Cardiopulmonary testing revealed longer exercise time (RVA 255 +/- 110 s) (His 280 +/- 104 s) (P < 0.05), higher O2 uptake (RVA 15 +/- 4 mL/kg per minute) (His 16 +/- 4 mL/kg minute) (P < 0.05), and later anaerobic threshold (RVA 126 +/- 71 s) (His 145 +/- 74 s) (P < 0.05) with DHBP compared to RVA pacing. Long-term DHBP is safe and effective in humans. DHBP is associated with a superior Treppe effect and increased cardiopulmonary reserve when compared to RVA pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15189517     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00548.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  29 in total

1.  Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Claudio Cemin; Gianpaolo Broso; Tiziana Marotta; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: not ready for prime-time.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Future easy and physiological cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo Marino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-26

Review 4.  Direct His bundle and paraHisian cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; S S Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  New concepts in physiologic cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Dwight W Reynolds; Christina M Murray
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

Review 7.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

8.  Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing.

Authors:  Mark Young Lee; Srinath Chilakamarri Yeshwant; Daniel Lawrence Lustgarten
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  Permanent His bundle pacing: shaping the future of physiological ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 10.  Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?

Authors:  Zak Loring; Albert Y Sun
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.