Literature DB >> 22986474

Pressure cycling technology (PCT) reduces effects of inhibitors of the PCR.

Pamela L Marshall1, Jonathan L King, Nathan P Lawrence, Alexander Lazarev, Vera S Gross, Bruce Budowle.   

Abstract

A common problem in the analysis of forensic human DNA evidence, or for that matter any nucleic acid analysis, is the presence of contaminants or inhibitors. Contaminants may copurify with the DNA, inhibiting downstream PCR or they may present samples effectively as containing fewer templates than exist in the PCR, even when the actual amount of DNA is adequate. Typically, these challenged samples exhibit allele imbalance, allele dropout, and sequence-specific inhibition, leading to interpretational difficulties. Lessening the effects of inhibitors may increase the effective yield of challenged low template copy samples. High pressure may alter some inhibitors and render them less effective at reducing the yield of PCR products. In an attempt to enhance the amplicon yield of inhibited DNA samples, pressure cycling technology was applied to DNA exposed to various concentrations of hematin (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7 μM) and humic acid (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7 ng/μL). The effect of high pressure on the inhibitors, and subsequently the PCR process, was assessed by measuring DNA quantity by quantitative PCR and evaluating short tandem repeat typing results. The results support that pressure cycling technology reduces inhibitory effects and thus, in effect, enhances yield of contaminated amplified products of both hematin and humic acid contaminate samples. Based on the results obtained in this study, this method can improve the ability to type challenged or inhibited DNA samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986474     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0770-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  35 in total

1.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data.

Authors:  Christian Ramakers; Jan M Ruijter; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; Antoon F M Moorman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Basic aspects of phase changes under high pressure.

Authors:  Antonio Delgado; Leszek Kulisiewicz; Cornelia Rauh; Rainer Benning
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Temperature-pressure configurational landscape of lipid bilayers and proteins.

Authors:  R Winter; W Dzwolak
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.770

4.  Increased protein yields from Escherichia coli using pressure-cycling technology.

Authors:  Gary B Smejkal; Myra H Robinson; Nathan P Lawrence; Feng Tao; Calvin A Saravis; Richard T Schumacher
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2006-04

5.  Sample preparation for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using pressure cycling technology.

Authors:  Gary B Smejkal; Frank A Witzmann; Heather Ringham; Deena Small; Susan F Chase; James Behnke; Edmund Ting
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Application of low copy number STR typing to the identification of aged, degraded skeletal remains.

Authors:  Jodi A Irwin; Mark D Leney; Odile Loreille; Suzanne M Barritt; Alexander F Christensen; Thomas D Holland; Brion C Smith; Thomas J Parsons
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 7.  High-pressure processing--effects on microbial food safety and food quality.

Authors:  Kiera M Considine; Alan L Kelly; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Colin Hill; Roy D Sleator
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  A comparison of the effects of PCR inhibition in quantitative PCR and forensic STR analysis.

Authors:  Maribel E Funes-Huacca; Kerry Opel; Robyn Thompson; Bruce R McCord
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 9.  Aspects of food processing and its effect on allergen structure.

Authors:  Angelika Paschke
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.914

10.  Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon.

Authors:  Jim F Huggett; Tanya Novak; Jeremy A Garson; Clare Green; Stephen D Morris-Jones; Robert F Miller; Alimuddin Zumla
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2008-08-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pressure-assisted sample preparation for proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Pawel P Olszowy; Ariel Burns; Pawel S Ciborowski
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 2.  PCR inhibition in qPCR, dPCR and MPS-mechanisms and solutions.

Authors:  Maja Sidstedt; Peter Rådström; Johannes Hedman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.142

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.