| Literature DB >> 21461390 |
Nedyalka V Georgieva1, Margarita Gabrashanska, Ventsislav Koinarski, Zvezdelina Yaneva.
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine the dietary supplements of Zn containing diet on the antioxidant status in chickens experimentally infected with Eimeria acervulina. The antioxidant status was monitored via determination of MDA concentrations and erythrocyte SOD and CAT activities, as well as vitamin E, vitamin C, Cu, and Zn in liver, muscle, and serum. The results showed increased MDA (P < .05), CAT (P < .001), and decreased SOD (P < .001) in the infected birds. Significant changes in Cu and Zn concentrations and dramatically reduction of vitamin C and E concentrations in the infected chickens were found. The observed deviations in the studied enzymes and nonenzymatic parameters evidence the occurrence of oxidative stress following the infection and impaired antioxidant status of chickens, infected with Eimeria acervulina. Our results proved the ameliorating role of CuZn(OH)(3)Cl (0.170 g per kg food) against Eimeria acervulina-induced oxidative damage in infected chickens.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21461390 PMCID: PMC3065002 DOI: 10.4061/2011/647124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Figure 1Blood MDA concentrations and erythrocyte SOD and CAT activities in chickens.
Figure 2Cu level in broiler chickens.
Figure 3Zn level in broiler chickens.
Figure 4Content of vitamin C in broiler chickens.
Figure 5Content of vitamin E in broiler chickens.
SD, %, values for the parameters MDA, SOD, CAT, Cu, Zn, and Vitamins E and C.
| Groups | Cu | Zn | Vitamin E | Vitamin C | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA | SOD | CAT | liver | muscle | serum | liver | muscle | serum | liver | muscle | serum | liver | muscle | serum | |
| Healthy controls | 0.07 | 63.60 | 117.60 | 7.100 | 0.800 | 0.350 | 55.600 | 7.600 | 0.990 | 0.330 | 0.250 | 0.300 | 3.330 | 0.055 | 0.099 |
| Infected with | 0.041 | 106.203 | 115.203 | 8.140 | 0.990 | 0.330 | 90.450 | 4.100 | 0.990 | 0.750 | 0.140 | 0.040 | 3.300 | 0.042 | 0.092 |
| 0.05* | 211.00*** | 152.00*** | 5.000 | 1.450 | 0.100 | 81.000 | 1.200 | 1.100 | 1.120 | 0.210 | 0.090 | 2.900 | 0.080 | 0.073 | |
1 P < .05; 2P < .01; 3P < .001 versus healthy (negative) controls
*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001 versus infected (positive) controls.