Literature DB >> 21461181

How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging.

Katy Carlson1, Lyn Frazier, Charles Clifton.   

Abstract

Prosody has a large impact on language processing. We contrast two views of how prosody and intonation might exert their effects. On a 'prosodic packaging' approach, prosodic boundaries structure the linguistic input into perceptual and memory units, with the consequence that material in earlier packages is less accessible for linguistic processing than material in the current package. This approach claims that such lessened accessibility holds true for the comprehension of all constructions, regardless of the particular kind of linguistic dependency that needs to be established using the earlier constituent. A 'specialized role' approach, by contrast, attributes to prosodic boundaries a role in making grouping decisions when building hierarchical structure, but attributes to pitch accents the major role in determining the accessibility of a constituent. The results of four listening studies with replacive sentences (Diane thought Patrick was entertaining, not Louise) support the predictions of the specialized role hypothesis over the prosodic packaging approach.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21461181      PMCID: PMC3066009          DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lingua        ISSN: 0024-3841


  13 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; K Alter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Effects of pitch accent position, type, and status on focus projection.

Authors:  Pauline Welby
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: a study of anticipatory eye movements.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Martine Grice; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-12

5.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

Authors:  S R Speer; M M Kjelgaard; K M Dobroth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

Review 7.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing.

Authors:  S Shattuck-Hufnagel; A E Turk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

8.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

10.  Informative prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.500

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Joseph C Tyler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of prosody and thematic fit during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Katherine J Midgley; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Using prosody during sentence processing in aphasia: Evidence from temporal neural dynamics.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Tracy Love; Katherine J Midgley; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.