Literature DB >> 21458913

Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy.

Thorsten Schlomm1, Hans Heinzer, Thomas Steuber, Georg Salomon, Oliver Engel, Uwe Michl, Alexander Haese, Markus Graefen, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A key prerequisite for urinary continence after radical prostatectomy (RP) is the functional length of the urethral sphincter and the stabilisation of its anatomic position within the pelvic floor.
OBJECTIVE: We describe our modified surgical technique for full functional-length urethra (FFLU) preservation during RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analysed 691 consecutive patients who underwent RP over a 12-mo period (285 without and 406 with the FFLU technique). SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The full functional urethra length was preserved by performing an individualised apical preparation strictly along anatomic landmarks, respecting the individual length of the intraprostatically located proportion of the urethral sphincter. Anatomic fixation of the sphincter was reached by a thorough preservation of the pelvic floor and anatomic restoration of the Mueller's ligaments. MEASUREMENTS: Continence rates were assessed at 7 d and 12 mo after removal of the catheter. Continence was defined as the use of no pads and no urinary leakage. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The continence rates were 50.1% and 30.9% 1 wk after catheter removal (p < 0.0001) and 96.9% and 94.7% (p=0.59) at 12 mo after surgery in patients operated on with the FFLU technique versus the non-FFLU technique. In multivariate regression analysis, only the surgical technique correlated significantly with the continence status 1 wk after catheter removal. Neither the overall positive surgical margin rates nor the number of positive margins at the urethral resection border differed significantly between the FFLU and non-FFLU groups (13.6% and 0.5% vs 14.9% and 1.3%, respectively). Although the patients' baseline characteristics were similar in the two surgical groups, the patients were not preoperatively randomised, and the number of patients in the groups was asymmetric.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an FFLU preparation and improved preservation of the anatomic fixation of the urethral sphincter complex resulted in significantly increased early urinary continence results.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458913     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  46 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Tyler R McClintock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

3.  Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Ricarda M Bauer; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Olga Solyanik; Kerstin A Brocker; Sonja M Kirchhoff
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Boehm; B Beyer; P Tennstedt; J Schiffmann; L Budaeus; A Haese; M Graefen; T Schlomm; H Heinzer; G Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Nina Natascha Harke; Christian Wagner; Nikolaos Liakos; Katarina Urbanova; Mustapha Addali; Boris A Hadaschik; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Carolina Coelius; Meike Adam; Pierre Tennstedt; Luis Kluth; Thomas Steuber; Hans Heinzer; Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm; Uwe Michl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Preoperative predictive model of recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhito Matsushita; Matthew T Kent; Andrew J Vickers; Christian von Bodman; Melanie Bernstein; Karim A Touijer; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent T Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Oguz Akin; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Validation of the current eligibility criteria for focal therapy in men with localized prostate cancer and the role of MRI.

Authors:  Raisa S Pompe; Bieke Kühn-Thomä; Yamini Nagaraj; Valia Veleva; Felix Preisser; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Gap between postulated and real outcome quality of radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  C Hampel; F Roos; J W Thüroff; A Neisius
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  [Systematic analysis of treatment results as a quality control instrument using the example of a large European center].

Authors:  B Beyer; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.