Literature DB >> 24668119

Safe-R: a novel score, accounting for oncological safe nerve-sparing at radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Andreas Becker1, Carolina Coelius, Meike Adam, Pierre Tennstedt, Luis Kluth, Thomas Steuber, Hans Heinzer, Markus Graefen, Thorsten Schlomm, Uwe Michl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to describe a novel score (safe-R), combining information on surgical margin status (SM) and extend of nerve-sparing (NS) applicable for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), and to test the impact of our frozen-section navigated nerve-sparing approach (NeuroSAFE) on safe-R score.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 9,635 RPs performed at our center between 2002 and 2011. Of these, 47 % were conducted with NeuroSAFE. Proportions of NS and SM status were assessed. Subsequently, a score for oncological safe NS (safe-R) was developed; Safe-R was categorized as 3 (for negative SM and bilateral NS), 2 (for negative SM and unilateral NS), 1 (for negative SM without NS), and 0 (for patients with positive SM), respectively. The impact of NeuroSAFE on safe-R was analyzed by chi-square test and confirmed by multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for preoperative risk factors.
RESULTS: Applying NeuroSAFE resulted in enhanced safe-R score, indicating lower rates of positive SM and higher rates of NS, across all risk categories (all p < 0.001). For example in high-risk patients, NeuroSAFE resulted in lower proportions of safe-R 0 (27.6 vs. 33.6 %) and higher proportions of safe-R 3 (32.4 vs. 17.1 %, p < 0.001). Linkage between the NeuroSAFE approach and safe-R was confirmed after multinomial logistic adjustment for preoperative risk factors. All results were confirmed in a propensity-matched cohort (matched for preoperative risk factors and year of surgery, data not shown).
CONCLUSION: Safe-R represents a novel tool to assess and report on oncological safe nerve-sparing in RP. NeuroSAFE is associated with enhanced safe-R scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668119     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1273-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  30 in total

Review 1.  A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand Guillonneau; R Jeffrey Karnes; Judd W Moul; Edward M Schaeffer; Christian Stief; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Christian Eichelberg; Giovanni Lughezzani; Maxine Sun; Paul Perrotte; Felix K H Chun; Georg Salomon; Thomas Steuber; Jens Köllermann; Guido Sauter; Sascha A Ahyai; Mario Zacharias; Margit Fisch; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Andreas Erbersdobler; Felix K-H Chun; Thorsten Schlom; Paul Perrotte; Hartwig Huland; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; M Weinstein; J E Tomaszewski; D Schultz; M Rhude; S Rocha; A Wein; J P Richie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Rafael F Coelho; Sanket Chauhan; Kenneth J Palmer; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio Camacho; Geoff Coughlin; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Preoperative risk stratification predicts likelihood of concurrent PSA-free survival, continence, and potency (the trifecta analysis) after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Benjamin A Spencer; Tara R McCann; James M McKiernan; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.