OBJECTIVE: To build a predictive model of urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP) that incorporates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and clinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of data from 2,849 patients who underwent pelvic staging MRI before RP from November 2001 to June 2010. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between each MRI variable and continence at 6 or 12 months, adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and then used multivariable logistic regression to create our model. A nomogram was constructed using the multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In all, 68% (1,742/2,559) and 82% (2,205/2,689) regained function at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the base model, age, BMI and ASA score were significant predictors of continence at 6 or 12 months on univariate analysis (P < 0.005). Among the preoperative MRI measurements, membranous urethral length, which showed great significance, was incorporated into the base model to create the full model. For continence recovery at 6 months, the addition of membranous urethral length increased the area under the curve (AUC) to 0.664 for the validation set, an increase of 0.064 over the base model. For continence recovery at 12 months, the AUC was 0.674, an increase of 0.085 over the base model. CONCLUSION: Using our model, the likelihood of continence recovery increases with membranous urethral length and decreases with age, BMI and ASA score. This model could be used for patient counselling and for the identification of patients at high risk for urinary incontinence in whom to study changes in operative technique that improve urinary function after RP.
OBJECTIVE: To build a predictive model of urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy (RP) that incorporates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters and clinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of data from 2,849 patients who underwent pelvic staging MRI before RP from November 2001 to June 2010. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between each MRI variable and continence at 6 or 12 months, adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and then used multivariable logistic regression to create our model. A nomogram was constructed using the multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In all, 68% (1,742/2,559) and 82% (2,205/2,689) regained function at 6 and 12 months, respectively. In the base model, age, BMI and ASA score were significant predictors of continence at 6 or 12 months on univariate analysis (P < 0.005). Among the preoperative MRI measurements, membranous urethral length, which showed great significance, was incorporated into the base model to create the full model. For continence recovery at 6 months, the addition of membranous urethral length increased the area under the curve (AUC) to 0.664 for the validation set, an increase of 0.064 over the base model. For continence recovery at 12 months, the AUC was 0.674, an increase of 0.085 over the base model. CONCLUSION: Using our model, the likelihood of continence recovery increases with membranous urethral length and decreases with age, BMI and ASA score. This model could be used for patient counselling and for the identification of patients at high risk for urinary incontinence in whom to study changes in operative technique that improve urinary function after RP.
Authors: Stephen A Boorjian; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand Guillonneau; R Jeffrey Karnes; Judd W Moul; Edward M Schaeffer; Christian Stief; Kevin C Zorn Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ricarda M Bauer; Christian Gozzi; Wilhelm Hübner; Victor W Nitti; Giacomo Novara; Andrew Peterson; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Christian G Stief Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Christian von Bodman; Kazuhito Matsushita; Caroline Savage; Mika P Matikainen; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Farhang Rabbani; Oguz Akin; Jaspreet S Sandhu Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: J Stephen Jones; Sandip P Vasavada; Joseph B Abdelmalak; Louis Liou; Elazab S Ahmed; Craig D Zippe; Raymond R Rackley Journal: Urology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sean F Mungovan; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Neil A Smart; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: M E O'Callaghan; E Raymond; J Campbell; A D Vincent; K Beckmann; D Roder; S Evans; J McNeil; J Millar; J Zalcberg; M Borg; K Moretti Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Matthew B Clements; Caroline C Gmelich; Emily A Vertosick; Jim C Hu; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Vincent P Laudone; Karim A Touijer; Jonathan A Coleman; Andrew J Vickers; Behfar Ehdaie Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Fabiana S B Perez; Nathalia C Rosa; Adson F da Rocha; Luciana R T Peixoto; Cristiano J Miosso Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Yvonka van Wijk; Bram Ramaekers; Ben G L Vanneste; Iva Halilaj; Cary Oberije; Avishek Chatterjee; Tom Marcelissen; Arthur Jochems; Henry C Woodruff; Philippe Lambin Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Eelco R P Collette; Sjoerd O Klaver; Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte; Dies van den Ouden; Reindert J A van Moorselaar; André N Vis Journal: J Robot Surg Date: 2020-09-15