BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it is uncertain if histopathological techniques accurately detect pCR. We tested a novel molecular approach for detecting pCR and compared it with current histopathological approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Pretreatment tumor biopsies and surgical specimens were collected from 96 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Tumor response was categorized by tumor regression grade. Tumor DNA from pre-CRT tumor biopsies was screened for K-ras and p53 mutations. DNA from paired surgical specimens was then screened for the same mutations using highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 96 (71%) pretreatment biopsies harbored K-ras and/or p53 mutation; 36 (38%) had K-ras mutations, 52 (54%) had p53 mutations, and 20 (21%) carried both mutations. Of 70 patients with tumor regression grades 1 to 3, sixty-six (94%) had a concordant K-ras and p53 mutation profile in pre- and post-treatment tissues. Of 26 patients with tumor regression grade 0 (pCR), 12 had K-ras or p53 mutations in pretreatment biopsies. Of these, 2 (17%) patients had the same K-ras (n = 1) or p53 (n = 1) mutation detected in post-treatment tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive molecular techniques detect K-ras and p53 mutations in post-CRT surgical specimens in some patients with a pCR. This suggests histopathological techniques might not be completely accurate, and some patients diagnosed with a pCR to CRT might have occult cancers cells in their surgical specimens.
BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is an important prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal cancer. However, it is uncertain if histopathological techniques accurately detect pCR. We tested a novel molecular approach for detecting pCR and compared it with current histopathological approaches. STUDY DESIGN: Pretreatment tumor biopsies and surgical specimens were collected from 96 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. Tumor response was categorized by tumor regression grade. Tumor DNA from pre-CRT tumor biopsies was screened for K-ras and p53 mutations. DNA from paired surgical specimens was then screened for the same mutations using highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction-based techniques. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 96 (71%) pretreatment biopsies harbored K-ras and/or p53 mutation; 36 (38%) had K-ras mutations, 52 (54%) had p53 mutations, and 20 (21%) carried both mutations. Of 70 patients with tumor regression grades 1 to 3, sixty-six (94%) had a concordant K-ras and p53 mutation profile in pre- and post-treatment tissues. Of 26 patients with tumor regression grade 0 (pCR), 12 had K-ras or p53 mutations in pretreatment biopsies. Of these, 2 (17%) patients had the same K-ras (n = 1) or p53 (n = 1) mutation detected in post-treatment tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive molecular techniques detect K-ras and p53 mutations in post-CRT surgical specimens in some patients with a pCR. This suggests histopathological techniques might not be completely accurate, and some patients diagnosed with a pCR to CRT might have occult cancers cells in their surgical specimens.
Authors: N A Janjan; V S Khoo; J Abbruzzese; R Pazdur; R Dubrow; K R Cleary; P K Allen; P M Lynch; G Glober; R Wolff; T A Rich; J Skibber Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Maarten P Tabor; J Alain Kummer; C René Leemans; Ruud H Brakenhoff Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Viola M M van Houten; C René Leemans; J Alain Kummer; Janny Dijkstra; Dirk J Kuik; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Gordon B Snow; Ruud H Brakenhoff Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Steven J Cohen; Cornelis J A Punt; Nicholas Iannotti; Bruce H Saidman; Kert D Sabbath; Nashat Y Gabrail; Joel Picus; Michael Morse; Edith Mitchell; M Craig Miller; Gerald V Doyle; Henk Tissing; Leon W M M Terstappen; Neal J Meropol Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Claudio V Sole; Felipe A Calvo; Emilio Alvarez; Isabel Peligros; Pilar Garcia-Alfonso; Carlos Ferrer; Enrique Ochoa; Rafael Herranz; Jose L Carreras Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Zhenbin Chen; David D Smith; Wenyan Li; Robert D Madoff; Peter Cataldo; Jorge Marcet; Carlos Pastor Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 12.969