Literature DB >> 31056731

Mutation in BRAF and SMAD4 associated with resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Dan Jiang1, Xin Wang2, Yajian Wang3, Dana Philips4, Wenjian Meng5, Moli Xiong3, Junyi Zhao3, Linyong Sun3, Du He3, Kun Li4.   

Abstract

Our study was done in order to identify novel molecular markers to predict which locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs) might be resistant to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Seventy-four patients with LARCs treated with nCRT were collected. Pathological evaluation after nCRT was performed according to the tumor regression grading (TRG) system. Next-generation sequencing kit including 279 exons of 59 genes was performed on Illumina Miseq Platform. Sanger sequencing was performed to confirm some mutations. Four of the tumors (4/74, 5.4%) had BRAF mutation, which presented in one TRG 2 tumor and three TRG 3 tumors but was not observed in TRG 0-1 tumors. Higher mutational frequency of BRAF gene in TRG 3 tumors (3/12, 25%) was found in comparison with the TRG 0-2 tumors (1/62, 1.6%; p = 0.012). Eight tumors (8/74, 10.8%) harbored SMAD4 mutations, which was mutated across all TRG groups. However, SMAD4 mutated more in TRG 3 tumors (4/12, 33.3%) compared with that in TRG 0-2 tumors (4/62, 6.5%; p = 0.020). The patients with BRAF-mutated LARCs had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.045) and shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.000) than the BRAF wild-type (WT) ones. The patients with SMAD4-mutated tumors had shorter PFS than the WT cases (p = 0.008). BRAF and SMAD4 genetic mutations might be important molecular markers to predict resistance to nCRT and poor prognosis in LARCs. More cases are needed to confirm these findings in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Predictor; Rectal cancer; SMAD4

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31056731     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02576-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  24 in total

1.  Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate.

Authors:  Joakim Folkesson; Helgi Birgisson; Lars Pahlman; Bjorn Cedermark; Bengt Glimelius; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pathological response following long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  R Ryan; D Gibbons; J M P Hyland; D Treanor; A White; H E Mulcahy; D P O'Donoghue; M Moriarty; D Fennelly; K Sheahan
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Molecular diagnosis of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenbin Chen; Marjun P Duldulao; Wenyan Li; Wendy Lee; Joseph Kim; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  TP53 genotype but not p53 immunohistochemical result predicts response to preoperative short-term radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Kandioler; Ronald Zwrtek; Carmen Ludwig; Elisabeth Janschek; Meinhard Ploner; Friedrich Hofbauer; Irene Kührer; Sonja Kappel; Friedrich Wrba; Manfred Horvath; Josef Karner; Karl Renner; Michael Bergmann; Judith Karner-Hanusch; Richard Pötter; Raimund Jakesz; Bela Teleky; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  KRAS and BRAF mutations and PTEN expression do not predict efficacy of cetuximab-based chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Philipp Erben; Philipp Ströbel; Karoline Horisberger; Juliana Popa; Beatrice Bohn; Benjamin Hanfstein; Georg Kähler; Peter Kienle; Stefan Post; Frederik Wenz; Andreas Hochhaus; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Mutation analysis of the BRAF, ARAF and RAF-1 genes in human colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Karin Fransén; Maria Klintenäs; Anna Osterström; Jan Dimberg; Hans-Jürg Monstein; Peter Söderkvist
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Prognostic role of EGFR gene copy number and KRAS mutation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  C Bengala; S Bettelli; F Bertolini; G Sartori; A Fontana; N Malavasi; R Depenni; S Zironi; C Del Giovane; G Luppi; P F Conte
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jochen Gaedcke; Marian Grade; Klaus Jung; Markus Schirmer; Peter Jo; Christoph Obermeyer; Hendrik A Wolff; Markus K Herrmann; Tim Beissbarth; Heinz Becker; Thomas Ried; Michael Ghadimi
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Federica Di Nicolantonio; Miriam Martini; Francesca Molinari; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Sabrina Arena; Piercarlo Saletti; Sara De Dosso; Luca Mazzucchelli; Milo Frattini; Salvatore Siena; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  10 in total

1.  Association of mismatch repair status with survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Biao Ye; Yi-Kan Cheng; Lin Zhang; Yi-Feng Zou; Ping Chen; Yan-Hong Deng; Yan Huang; Jian-Hong Peng; Xiao-Jian Wu; Ping Lan
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-09-07

2.  53BP1 expression and immunoscore are associated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ai Huang; Yong Xiao; Chunfen Peng; Tao Liu; Zhenyu Lin; Qin Yang; Tao Zhang; Jun Liu; Hong Ma
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Effect of BRCA1 on the Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Resistance of Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Transcriptome Sequencing Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Wen; Shui Liu; Manhua Cui
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Multiple roles of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 in tumorigenesis, stem cells, drug resistance, and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Chuan-Jing Dai; Yu-Ting Cao; Fang Huang; Yi-Gang Wang
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  ceRNA Networks: The Backbone Role in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Resistance/Sensitivity of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Lin He; Hao Chang; Yuhong Qi; Bing Zhang; Qiuju Shao
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 6.  Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: from biomarkers to tumor models.

Authors:  Moying Li; Qiyun Xiao; Nachiyappan Venkatachalam; Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz; Marlon R Veldwijk; Carsten Herskind; Matthias P Ebert; Tianzuo Zhan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 8.168

7.  Association between microsatellite instability and tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Jaram Lee; Hyeong-Min Park; Chang Hyun Kim; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Heung-Kwon Oh; Sung-Bum Kang; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 1.766

8.  Prognostic value of functional SMAD4 localization in extrahepatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Takayama; Shogo Kobayashi; Kunihito Gotoh; Kazuki Sasaki; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Daisaku Yamada; Yoshito Tomimaru; Hirofumi Akita; Tadafumi Asaoka; Takehiro Noda; Hiroshi Wada; Hidenori Takahashi; Masahiro Tanemura; Yuichiro Doki; Hidetoshi Eguchi
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 3.253

9.  Combination of Changes in CEA and CA199 Concentration After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Could Predict the Prognosis of Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Jieyi Zhao; Huamin Zhao; Tingting Jia; Shiru Yang; Xiaoyu Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.602

10.  The Krüppel-like factor (KLF5) as a predictive biomarker in preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Sung Gil Park; Kyung-Sub Kim; Yong Hee Choi; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 1.859

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.