Literature DB >> 10421535

Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

N A Janjan1, V S Khoo, J Abbruzzese, R Pazdur, R Dubrow, K R Cleary, P K Allen, P M Lynch, G Glober, R Wolff, T A Rich, J Skibber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed.
RESULTS: The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4NI in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. > or = 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of > 1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41 % of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage <T4 (p < 0.01), and uN negative (p < 0.008). SP was performed in 23 patients (72%) with a CR and in 48 (67%) of downstaged cases. Among the 69 tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge, 29 (42%) were resected with a SP. The level of response was important for tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge because a SP was performed in 9 of the 17 (53%) CRs in this group while only 20 of 52 patients (38%) had a SP when residual disease was present after CTX/XRT. For tumors located > 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10421535     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00099-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  120 in total

1.  Total mesorectal excision of initially unresectable locally advanced rectal cancer infiltrating the pelvic wall after treatment with FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab and preoperative chemoradiation: report of a case.

Authors:  Yoshiro Itatani; Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Keiko Yamakawa; Rota Noaki; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Masatoshi Oya; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  A multi-centre pathologist survey on pathological processing and regression grading of colorectal cancer resection specimens treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Runjan Chetty; Pelvender Gill; Dhirendra Govender; Adrian Bateman; Hee Jin Chang; David Driman; Fraser Duthie; Marisa Gomez; Eleanor Jaynes; Cheok Soon Lee; Michael Locketz; Claudia Mescoli; Corwyn Rowsell; Anne Rullier; Stefano Serra; Neil Shepherd; Eva Szentgyorgyi; Rajkumar Vajpeyi; Lai Mun Wang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2N0 rectal cancer: preliminary results of the ACOSOG Z6041 trial.

Authors:  Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Qian Shi; Charles R Thomas; Emily Chan; Peter Cataldo; Jorge Marcet; David Medich; Alessio Pigazzi; Samuel Oommen; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sphincter-preserving operations following preoperative chemoradiation: an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer?

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Eun Joo Jung; Yoon Ah Park; Kang Young Lee; Seung-Kook Sohn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Rectal cancer treatment: improving the picture.

Authors:  Juan A Diaz-Gonzalez; Leire Arbea; Javier Aristu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Di Betta; A D'Hoore; L Filez; F Penninckx
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results.

Authors:  Angelita Habr-Gama; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Wladimir Nadalin; Jorge Sabbaga; Ulysses Ribeiro; Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa; Fábio Guilherme Campos; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prognostic factors for postoperative morbidity and tumour response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annefleur E M Berkel; Dankert P Woutersen; Job van der Palen; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer and impact on outcome.

Authors:  Mahshid Jalilian; Sidney Davis; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Bhuvana Sugamaran; Ian W Porter; Stephen Bell; Satish K Warrier; Roger Wale
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.