Literature DB >> 28501539

Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics of visual selective attention during a flanker task.

Timothy J McDermott1, Alex I Wiesman2, Amy L Proskovec3, Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham2, Tony W Wilson4.   

Abstract

The flanker task is a test of visual selective attention that has been widely used to probe error monitoring, response conflict, and related constructs. However, to date, few studies have focused on the selective attention component of this task and imaged the underlying oscillatory dynamics serving task performance. In this study, 21 healthy adults successfully completed an arrow-based version of the Eriksen flanker task during magnetoencephalography (MEG). All MEG data were pre-processed and transformed into the time-frequency domain. Significant oscillatory brain responses were imaged using a beamforming approach, and voxel time series were extracted from the peak responses to identify the temporal dynamics. Across both congruent and incongruent flanker conditions, our results indicated robust decreases in alpha (9-12Hz) activity in medial and lateral occipital regions, bilateral parietal cortices, and cerebellar areas during task performance. In parallel, increases in theta (3-7Hz) oscillatory activity were detected in dorsal and ventral frontal regions, and the anterior cingulate. As per conditional effects, stronger alpha responses (i.e., greater desynchronization) were observed in parietal, occipital, and cerebellar cortices during incongruent relative to congruent trials, whereas the opposite pattern emerged for theta responses (i.e., synchronization) in the anterior cingulate, left dorsolateral prefrontal, and ventral prefrontal cortices. Interestingly, the peak latency of theta responses in these latter brain regions was significantly correlated with reaction time, and may partially explain the amplitude difference observed between congruent and incongruent trials. Lastly, whole-brain exploratory analyses implicated the frontal eye fields, right temporoparietal junction, and premotor cortices. These findings suggest that regions of both the dorsal and ventral attention networks contribute to visual selective attention processes during incongruent trials, and that such differential processes are transient and fully completed shortly after the behavioral response in most trials.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha; Cortical; MEG; Magnetoencephalography; Oscillation; Theta

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28501539      PMCID: PMC5548621          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  53 in total

1.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Multiple aspects of the stress response under social evaluative threat: an electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; John J B Allen
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 4.905

4.  Neuronal synchronization along the dorsal visual pathway reflects the focus of spatial attention.

Authors:  Markus Siegel; Tobias H Donner; Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Subthreshold muscle twitches dissociate oscillatory neural signatures of conflicts from errors.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  J Gross; J Kujala; M Hamalainen; L Timmermann; A Schnitzler; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Is an absolute level of cortical beta suppression required for proper movement? Magnetoencephalographic evidence from healthy aging.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements.

Authors:  S Taulu; J Simola
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Evidence for a role for the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in disengaging from an incorrect action.

Authors:  Eldad Yitzhak Hochman; Avinash Rao Vaidya; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  38 in total

1.  Load modulates the alpha and beta oscillatory dynamics serving verbal working memory.

Authors:  Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Frontoparietal Networks Mediate the Behavioral Impact of Alpha Inhibition in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Boman R Groff; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Polarity-dependent modulation of multi-spectral neuronal activity by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Timothy J McDermott; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 4.  Aberrant brain dynamics in neuroHIV: Evidence from magnetoencephalographic (MEG) imaging.

Authors:  Tony W Wilson; Brandon J Lew; Rachel K Spooner; Michael T Rezich; Alex I Wiesman
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.622

5.  Posterior Alpha and Gamma Oscillations Index Divergent and Superadditive Effects of Cognitive Interference.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Motor Interference, But Not Sensory Interference, Increases Midfrontal Theta Activity and Brain Synchronization during Reactive Control.

Authors:  Jakob Kaiser; Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Altered Brain Dynamics in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes During Working Memory Processing.

Authors:  Christine M Embury; Alex I Wiesman; Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Grace H Lord; Kaitlin L Brau; Andjela T Drincic; Cyrus V Desouza; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Beta and gamma oscillations index cognitive interference effects across a distributed motor network.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Sam M Koshy; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Oscillatory dynamics in the dorsal and ventral attention networks during the reorienting of attention.

Authors:  Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Alex I Wiesman; Timothy J McDermott; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Neural dynamics of verbal working memory processing in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Christine M Embury; Alex I Wiesman; Amy L Proskovec; Mackenzie S Mills; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Yu-Ping Wang; Vince D Calhoun; Julia M Stephen; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.